GUSE ranks 2nd and LGRO 18th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.
GUSE vs LGRO
GUSE −0.20pt a year
0.30%0.50%
GUSE 3.8×the volume
29K7.61K
GUSE vs LGRO Performance
+8.1%+9.4%
- GUSE 0.30%, better
- LGRO 0.50%
- GUSE $427M
- LGRO $136M
- GUSE
- LGRO +8.8%
- GUSE
- LGRO 0.34%
- GUSE 122
- LGRO 49
- GUSE 29K sh, better
- LGRO 7.61K sh
- GUSE $45.72
- LGRO $44.73
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GUSE | LGRO |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A97Higher | B62 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | A95Higher | B68 |
| Tradability | C45 | B64Higher |
| Holdings | A86Higher | B68 |
| Durability | A85Higher | B64 |
Rank among US Active Growth funds
Same Category. GUSE and LGRO are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GUSEA
LGROB
In short
GUSE Goldman's fundamental stock pickers hunting long-term growth in US companies, for 0.30% a year. The strategy dates to 2008 and charges well under the typical active US growth fund.
LGRO A boutique manager's concentrated take on large-cap growth: roughly 50 quality-and-growth names, actively chosen against the Bloomberg US 1000 Growth Index, at a fee that sits just under the typical active peer.
Stated mandate
GUSE The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital by investing in companies that the Investment Adviser believes are positioned for long-term growth.
LGRO LGRO seeks maximum total return and above-peer-average risk-adjusted returns.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GUSE vs LGRO Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GUSE vs LGRO Cost
Overpaying LGRO vs GUSE
$3,830
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GUSE 0.30%
$6,149
LGRO 0.50%
$9,979
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GUSE | LGRO | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $545 | $900 | $355 |
| 20 | $2,113 | $3,460 | $1,347 |
| 30 | $6,149 | $9,979 | $3,830 |
- 0.30%GUSE, cheaper
- 0.50%LGRO
- Middle half of US Active Growth funds
- Median 0.55%
GUSE 3rd cheapest of 90 funds
LGRO 33rd cheapest of 90 funds
GUSE vs LGRO Dividends
- GUSE
- LGRO 0.34%
- GUSE
- LGRO $0.15
- GUSE $0.30
- LGRO $0.03
- GUSE Dec 23, 2025
- LGRO Sep 17, 2026
- GUSE Dec 30, 2025
- LGRO Sep 22, 2026
- GUSE Irregular
- LGRO Quarterly
Distribution history
GUSE vs LGRO Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GUSE LGRO 16.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- GUSE LGRO 1.21
- Worst fall
- GUSE LGRO −23.2%
- Market sensitivity
- GUSE 0.94LGRO 1.24
GUSE and LGRO in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.30% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

