FELG vs PRCS: Grades, Fees and Holdings Compared

Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

FELGANYSE Arca

Parnassus Core Select ETF

PRCSCNYSE

Overlap

34.8%by weight

Expense ratio

FELG −0.40pt a year

FELG0.18%PRCS0.58%

Avg volume · 30D

FELG 14.3×the volume

FELG379KPRCS26.5K

FELG vs PRCS Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

−0.5%FELG+7.6%PRCS

Expense ratio: FELG 0.18%, better; PRCS 0.58%
Fund size: FELG $5.78B; PRCS $189M
1Y total return: FELG −0.5%; PRCS +7.6%, better
Yield (12M): FELG 0.37%; PRCS No data
Holdings: FELG 133; PRCS 27
Avg volume (30D): FELG 379K sh, better; PRCS 26.5K sh
NAV per share: FELG $42.20; PRCS $28.67
52W range

ETF.net Grade

Pillar letters and Scores for FELG, PRCS, with each pillar’s weight
Pillar	FELG	PRCS
Cost30% weight	A99Higher	D38
Mission25% weight	A82	Not scored
Risk15% weight	C51	A81Higher
Tradability15% weight	A85Higher	D35
Holdings10% weight	C52	C53Higher
Durability5% weight	A95Higher	C43

Rank among US Active Growth funds

How we build Categories ›

Same Category. FELG and PRCS are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Active Growth⁠

Category · 90 funds

See all 90 ›

FELG ranks 4th and PRCS 44th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.

Rank 1AJUSAJPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETFScore 86
Rank 2AGUSEGoldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETFScore 84
Rank 3ALRGCAB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETFScore 81
Rank 4AFELGFidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETFScore 80
Rank 5AGQQQAstoria US Quality Growth Kings ETFScore 77
Rank 44CCAMLCongress Large Cap Growth ETFScore 48
Rank 44CPRCSParnassus Core Select ETFScore 48
Rank 44CRJCARJ ClariVest Capital Appreciation ETFScore 48

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

FELGAFidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

PRCSCParnassus Core Select ETF

In short

FELG Active stock-picking on an index-fund budget. FELG charges 0.18% to tilt around the Russell 1000 Growth Index rather than copy it, running a strategy whose track record dates to 2007.

PRCS No data

Stated mandate

FELG The fund seeks capital appreciation and normally invests at least 80% of its assets in common stocks included in the Russell 1000® Growth Index.

PRCS No data

Why people hold it

FELG 0.18% a year, roughly a third of the typical fee among active US growth-conviction funds.
Not a moonshot: at least 80% of assets sit in Russell 1000 Growth constituents across about 110 stocks, so the manager's bets are tilts around a familiar benchmark.fidelity.com
One of the strongest implementations in its peer group, and cheaper than most of the other top-graded names there (GUSE and MAGS at 0.30%, LRGC at 0.39%).
A multi-billion-dollar fund from Fidelity with steady on-screen liquidity, and it pays quarterly.

PRCS No data

Worth knowing

FELG Concentrated by design: roughly 110 large-cap growth names, so the megacap tech leaders at the top of the Russell 1000 Growth Index drive the ride both ways.
Active means the portfolio deviates from the index on purpose, so results can land on either side of it.
Not the cheapest seat in the cohort: JUSA runs 0.12%, though its mandate is broad large-cap rather than the growth slice.

PRCS No data

Full FELG profile⁠

Full PRCS profile⁠

FELG vs PRCS Holdings

How FELG and PRCS differ

Overlap by weight

34.8%

Shared holdings make up 57.8% of PRCS and 52.9% of FELG.

Level by level

Holdings13 in both34.8%
Sector11 Sectors69.7%
Asset classEquity100%
Countryby domicile100%

Sector

Sector weights in FELG and PRCS, widest gap first
Sector	More in FELGMore in PRCS	FELG	PRCS
Technology	FELG +26.3 points	58.7%	32.4%
Consumer Discretionary	PRCS +8.3 points	6.4%	14.7%
Industrials	PRCS +7.5 points	7.9%	15.4%
Financials	PRCS +5.9 points	5.5%	11.4%
Materials	PRCS +4.8 points	0.5%	5.3%
Health Care	PRCS +3.7 points	6.1%	9.8%
Communication	FELG +3.6 points	14.6%	11.0%
Energy	FELG +0.2 points	0.2%	0.0%
Consumer Staples	FELG +0.1 points	0.1%	0.0%
Real Estate	FELG +0.1 points	0.1%	0.0%
Utilities	Same weight	0.0%	0.0%

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in FELG and PRCS, widest gap first
Country	More in FELGMore in PRCS	FELG	PRCS
United States	Same weight	100.0%	100.0%

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

FELG57.6%
PRCS56.7%

Securities held

FELG131
PRCS26

Asset class

FELG: Equity
PRCS: Equity

Holdings

Only in FELG118
In both13
Only in PRCS13

Only in FELG

118 securities, 46.4% of FELG by weight

Micron Technology Inc3.69%
Tesla Inc3.02%
Alphabet Inc Class C2.61%
Advanced Micro Devices Inc2.28%
Visa Inc Class A1.54%
Ge Aerospace1.44%
Texas Instruments Inc1.42%
Ge Vernova Inc1.20%
Palantir Technologies Inc1.02%
Crowdstrike Holdings Inc0.98%
Caterpillar Inc0.94%
Western Digital Corp0.93%
Amphenol Corporation Class A0.90%
Netflix Inc0.88%
Sandisk Corporation0.84%
Trane Technologies PLC0.80%
Kla Corp0.78%
Adobe Inc0.76%
Airbnb Inc Class A0.75%
Fortinet Inc0.67%
Lam Research Corp0.63%
Expedia Inc0.63%
Gilead Sciences Inc0.56%
Snowflake Inc0.55%
Uber Technologies Inc0.55%
Howmet Aerospace Inc0.55%
Atlassian Corp PLC Cls A0.54%
Schwab Charles Corp0.53%
Bank of New York Mellon Corp0.53%
Rtx Corp0.52%
Ecolab Inc0.52%
Comfort Systems Usa Inc0.51%
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co0.51%
Maplebear Inc0.49%
Keysight Technologies Inc0.47%
Unity Software Inc0.47%
Cisco Systems Inc0.46%
Hubspot Inc0.45%
Palo Alto Networks Inc0.40%
Ciena Corp0.39%
Seagate Techn Holdings PLC0.38%
Chime Financial Inc0.37%
Incyte Corp0.35%
Eaton Corp PLC0.34%
Lyft Inc0.34%
Docusign Inc0.32%
Arista Networks Inc0.31%
Veralto Corp0.30%
Quanta Svcs Inc0.30%
Travere Therapeutics Inc0.30%

Only in PRCS

13 securities, 41.8% of PRCS by weight

Danaher Corp.4.96%
Deere & Co.4.46%
Waste Management Inc.4.35%
Intercontinental Exchange Inc.3.32%
DoorDash Inc., Class A3.10%
Linde plc3.08%
Stryker Corp.3.06%
Vulcan Materials Co.2.92%
W.W. Grainger Inc.2.91%
Autozone Inc.2.49%
Ferguson Enterprises Inc.2.41%
Hubbell Inc. Class B2.39%
Synopsys Inc.2.35%

Weight gaps

All 13 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in FELG and PRCS, widest gap first
Holding	More in FELGMore in PRCS	FELG	PRCS
NVIDIA CorpNVDA	FELG +8.23 points	15.60%	7.37%
Microsoft CorpMSFT	PRCS +6.03 points	5.40%	11.43%
Amazon.com IncAMZN	PRCS +5.65 points	0.58%	6.23%
Apple IncAAPL	FELG +4.67 points	8.80%	4.13%
S&P Global IncSPGI	PRCS +3.04 points	0.20%	3.24%
Broadcom IncAVGO	FELG +3.04 points	4.65%	1.61%
Home Depot IncHD	PRCS +2.48 points	0.23%	2.71%
Applied Materials IncAMAT	PRCS +2.30 points	1.22%	3.52%
Mastercard Inc Class AMA	PRCS +1.77 points	1.87%	3.64%
Bank of America CorporationBAC	PRCS +1.65 points	0.51%	2.16%
Eli Lilly & CoLLY	FELG +1.19 points	3.90%	2.72%
Meta Platforms Inc Class AMETA	FELG +0.97 points	3.43%	2.46%
Alphabet Inc Class AGOOGL	PRCS +0.13 points	6.48%	6.61%

All 109 FELG holdings⁠All 26 PRCS holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

FELG vs PRCS Cost

Overpaying PRCS vs FELG

$7,704

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

FELG 0.18%
$3,749
PRCS 0.58%
$11,453

Amount$10,000

Years30 years

Cost over time

FELG 0.18%
PRCS 0.58%
Overpaying

Year by year

Year	FELG	PRCS	Overpaying
10	$328	$1,041	$713
20	$1,281	$3,986	$2,705
30	$3,749	$11,453	$7,704

Expense ratio

0.18%FELG, cheaper
0.58%PRCS

FELG0.18%PRCS0.58%

0.18%2.83%

Middle half of US Active Growth funds
Median 0.55%

FELG cheapest of 90 funds

PRCS 55th cheapest of 90 funds

FELG vs PRCS Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026

Yield (12M): FELG 0.37%; PRCS No data
Payout (12M): FELG $0.16; PRCS No data
Last payment: FELG $0.04; PRCS $0.04
Ex-dividend: FELG Sep 18, 2026; PRCS Dec 19, 2025
Paid on: FELG Sep 22, 2026; PRCS Dec 26, 2025
Frequency: FELG Quarterly; PRCS Irregular

Distribution history

Per share, 2023 to 2026, same scale for both

FELGQuarterly · 14 paymentsAll FELG payments⁠

PRCSIrregular · 1 paymentAll PRCS payments⁠

FELG vs PRCS Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years: FELG 16.3%since Dec 2023PRCS 12.4%since Jan 2025
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years: FELG 0.93since Dec 2023PRCS 0.51since Jan 2025
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years: FELG −23.9%since Nov 2023PRCS −18.2%since Dec 2024
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years: FELG 1.23PRCS 0.88; Market = 1

FELG and PRCS in the news

All news⁠

ETF Filings
BlackRock files to convert Advantage Large Cap Growth into a 0.22% ETF
Sep 29, 2026FELG

Popular comparisons

FELGAvsJUSAA
Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF · JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF
Expense ratio
0.18% · 0.18%
Category
PRCSCvsJUSAA
Parnassus Core Select ETF · JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF
Expense ratio
0.58% · 0.18%
Category
FELGAvsGUSEA
Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF · Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF
Expense ratio
0.18% · 0.30%
Category
PRCSCvsGUSEA
Parnassus Core Select ETF · Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF
Expense ratio
0.58% · 0.30%
Category
FELGAvsLRGCA
Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF · AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF
Expense ratio
0.18% · 0.39%
Category
PRCSCvsLRGCA
Parnassus Core Select ETF · AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF
Expense ratio
0.58% · 0.39%
Category

FELG vs PRCS

In short

Stated mandate

Why people hold it

Worth knowing

How FELG and PRCS differ

Level by level

Sector

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Concentration

Asset class

Holdings

Only in FELG

Only in PRCS

Weight gaps

Cost over time

Year by year

Distribution history

Fall from peak · 5 years

Risk facts

BlackRock files to convert Advantage Large Cap Growth into a 0.22% ETF

How FELG and PRCS differ

Level by level

Sector

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Concentration

Asset class

Holdings

Only in FELG

Only in PRCS

Weight gaps