GUSE vs PRCS: Grades, Fees and Holdings Compared

Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

GUSEANasdaq

Parnassus Core Select ETF

PRCSCNYSE

Overlap

35.0%by weight

Expense ratio

GUSE −0.28pt a year

GUSE0.30%PRCS0.58%

Avg volume · 30D

PRCS 1.1×the volume

GUSE24.9KPRCS26.5K

GUSE vs PRCS Performance

Dec 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+11.8%GUSE+6.7%PRCS

Expense ratio: GUSE 0.30%, better; PRCS 0.58%
Fund size: GUSE $421M; PRCS $189M
1Y total return: GUSE No data; PRCS +7.6%
Holdings: GUSE 122; PRCS 27
Avg volume (30D): GUSE 24.9K sh; PRCS 26.5K sh, better
NAV per share: GUSE $46.05; PRCS $28.67
52W range

ETF.net Grade

Pillar letters and Scores for GUSE, PRCS, with each pillar’s weight
Pillar	GUSE	PRCS
Cost30% weight	A97Higher	D38
Mission25% weight	Not scored	Not scored
Risk15% weight	A94Higher	A81
Tradability15% weight	C46Higher	D35
Holdings10% weight	A89Higher	C53
Durability5% weight	A85Higher	C43

Rank among US Active Growth funds

How we build Categories ›

Same Category. GUSE and PRCS are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Active Growth⁠

Category · 90 funds

See all 90 ›

GUSE ranks 2nd and PRCS 44th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.

Rank 1AJUSAJPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETFScore 86
Rank 2AGUSEGoldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETFScore 84
Rank 3ALRGCAB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETFScore 81
Rank 44CCAMLCongress Large Cap Growth ETFScore 48
Rank 44CPRCSParnassus Core Select ETFScore 48
Rank 44CRJCARJ ClariVest Capital Appreciation ETFScore 48

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

GUSEAGoldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

PRCSCParnassus Core Select ETF

In short

GUSE Goldman's fundamental stock pickers hunting long-term growth in US companies, for 0.30% a year. The strategy dates to 2008 and charges well under the typical active US growth fund.

PRCS No data

Stated mandate

GUSE The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital by investing in companies that the Investment Adviser believes are positioned for long-term growth.

PRCS No data

Why people hold it

GUSE Charges 0.30% a year, against a 0.54% median for its active US growth cohort. Cheap, for stock picking.
Actively run with no index to shadow. Managers hold companies they judge positioned for long-term growth, so the portfolio can look different from a large-cap benchmark.
Inception dates to 2008, so the strategy has run through multiple market cycles, not one long rally.
One of the stronger implementations in a crowded field of active US growth funds.

PRCS No data

Worth knowing

GUSE Trades thinly next to the category's heavyweights. Spreads can be wider, which bites most on large or hurried orders.
Two peers in the same top tier undercut it on fee: JUSA at 0.12% and FELG at 0.18%. Price is not where this one stands out.
Distributions land once or twice a year, not monthly. Growth of capital is the stated goal, not an income stream.

PRCS No data

Full GUSE profile⁠

Full PRCS profile⁠

GUSE vs PRCS Holdings

How GUSE and PRCS differ

Overlap by weight

35.0%

Shared holdings make up 64.2% of PRCS and 37.0% of GUSE.

Level by level

Holdings15 in both35.0%
Countryby domicile98.9%
Asset classEquity100%

Sector

No Sector split for GUSE.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in GUSE and PRCS, widest gap first
Country	More in GUSEMore in PRCS	GUSE	PRCS
United States	PRCS +1.1 points	98.9%	100.0%
Taiwan	GUSE +0.6 points	0.6%	0.0%
United Kingdom	GUSE +0.5 points	0.5%	0.0%

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

GUSE34.6%
PRCS56.7%

Securities held

GUSE121
PRCS26

Asset class

GUSE: Equity
PRCS: Equity

Holdings

Only in GUSE106
In both15
Only in PRCS11

Only in GUSE

106 securities, 61.2% of GUSE by weight

Coca-Cola Company (The)1.81%
Alphabet Inc.1.77%
Tesla Inc.1.77%
Micron Technology, Inc.1.77%
JPMorgan Chase & Co1.66%
Berkshire Hathaway Inc.1.61%
Advanced Micro Devices Inc.1.57%
Conocophillips1.41%
Exxonmobil Holdings Corporation1.20%
Visa Inc.1.14%
Walmart Inc1.07%
Tjx Companies Inc (New)1.02%
Agilent Technologies, Inc.1.02%
Johnson & Johnson0.93%
UnitedHealth Group Incorporated0.89%
Palantir Technologies Inc.0.88%
Netapp, Inc.0.85%
Merck & Co., Inc.0.81%
Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated0.79%
Intel Corporation0.78%
Phillips 660.78%
The Procter & Gamble Company0.76%
Cintas Corporation0.75%
General Electric Company0.73%
Ameren Corporation0.73%
Palo Alto Networks Inc.0.72%
Caterpillar Inc (Delaware)0.69%
Starbucks Corp.0.65%
Cencora Inc0.62%
Csx Corporation0.62%
Atmos Energy Corporation0.60%
T-Mobile Us, Inc.0.60%
Taiwan Semiconductor Mfg Ads-Adr0.59%
Kla Corp0.59%
Intl Business Machines Corp0.58%
Cadence Design Systems Inc0.57%
Costco Wholesale Corporation0.57%
Allstate Corporation0.56%
American Intl Group, Inc.0.55%
Western Digital Corporation0.54%
Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc.0.53%
Motorola Solutions Inc0.53%
Rtx Corp0.53%
Ge Vernova Llc0.52%
Repligen Corp0.51%
Amphenol Corp Cl-A (New)0.50%
Morgan Stanley0.50%
Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc.0.50%
Coca-Cola European Partners PLC0.48%
Arista Networks, Inc.0.48%

Only in PRCS

11 securities, 35.4% of PRCS by weight

Danaher Corp.4.96%
Deere & Co.4.46%
Waste Management Inc.4.35%
DoorDash Inc., Class A3.10%
Stryker Corp.3.06%
Vulcan Materials Co.2.92%
W.W. Grainger Inc.2.91%
Autozone Inc.2.49%
Ferguson Enterprises Inc.2.41%
Hubbell Inc. Class B2.39%
Synopsys Inc.2.35%

Weight gaps

All 15 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in GUSE and PRCS, widest gap first
Holding	More in GUSEMore in PRCS	GUSE	PRCS
Microsoft CorporationMSFT	PRCS +6.46 points	4.97%	11.43%
Alphabet Inc.GOOGL	PRCS +3.85 points	2.76%	6.61%
Applied Materials IncAMAT	PRCS +2.79 points	0.73%	3.52%
S&P Global Inc.SPGI	PRCS +2.71 points	0.53%	3.24%
Intercontinental Exchange IncICE	PRCS +2.57 points	0.75%	3.32%
Mastercard IncorporatedMA	PRCS +2.21 points	1.43%	3.64%
Amazon.com IncAMZN	PRCS +2.16 points	4.07%	6.23%
The Home Depot, Inc.HD	PRCS +2.14 points	0.57%	2.71%
Linde PLC	PRCS +1.91 points	1.17%	3.08%
Bank of America CorpBAC	PRCS +1.36 points	0.80%	2.16%
Apple Inc.AAPL	GUSE +1.00 points	5.13%	4.13%
Broadcom Inc.AVGO	GUSE +0.78 points	2.39%	1.61%
Eli Lilly & CoLLY	PRCS +0.72 points	2.00%	2.72%
Meta Platforms Inc-Class AMETA	PRCS +0.32 points	2.14%	2.46%
NVIDIA CorporationNVDA	GUSE +0.16 points	7.53%	7.37%

All 121 GUSE holdings⁠All 26 PRCS holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

GUSE vs PRCS Cost

Overpaying PRCS vs GUSE

$5,304

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

GUSE 0.30%
$6,149
PRCS 0.58%
$11,453

Amount$10,000

Years30 years

Cost over time

GUSE 0.30%
PRCS 0.58%
Overpaying

Year by year

Year	GUSE	PRCS	Overpaying
10	$545	$1,041	$496
20	$2,113	$3,986	$1,873
30	$6,149	$11,453	$5,304

Expense ratio

0.30%GUSE, cheaper
0.58%PRCS

GUSE0.30%PRCS0.58%

0.18%2.83%

Middle half of US Active Growth funds
Median 0.55%

GUSE 3rd cheapest of 90 funds

PRCS 55th cheapest of 90 funds

GUSE vs PRCS Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026

Last payment: GUSE $0.30; PRCS $0.04
Ex-dividend: GUSE Dec 23, 2025; PRCS Dec 19, 2025
Paid on: GUSE Dec 30, 2025; PRCS Dec 26, 2025
Frequency: GUSE Irregular; PRCS Irregular

Distribution history

Per share, 2025 to 2026, same scale for both

GUSEIrregular · 1 paymentAll GUSE payments⁠

PRCSIrregular · 1 paymentAll PRCS payments⁠

GUSE vs PRCS Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years: GUSE No dataPRCS 12.4%since Jan 2025
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years: GUSE No dataPRCS 0.51since Jan 2025
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years: GUSE No dataPRCS −18.2%since Dec 2024
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years: GUSE 0.93PRCS 0.88; Market = 1

Popular comparisons

GUSEAvsJUSAA
Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF · JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF
Expense ratio
0.30% · 0.18%
Category
PRCSCvsJUSAA
Parnassus Core Select ETF · JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF
Expense ratio
0.58% · 0.18%
Category
GUSEAvsLRGCA
Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF · AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF
Expense ratio
0.30% · 0.39%
Category
PRCSCvsLRGCA
Parnassus Core Select ETF · AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF
Expense ratio
0.58% · 0.39%
Category
GUSEAvsFELGA
Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF · Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF
Expense ratio
0.30% · 0.18%
Category
PRCSCvsFELGA
Parnassus Core Select ETF · Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF
Expense ratio
0.58% · 0.18%
Category