Skip to content

FELG vs QDVO

Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

FELGANYSE Arca

Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF

QDVOBNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

FELG −0.38pt a year

FELG0.18%QDVO0.56%

Avg volume · 30D

FELG 1.6×the volume

FELG379KQDVO234K

FELG vs QDVO Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

−0.5%FELG+6.7%QDVO

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. FELG −0.5%. QDVO +6.7%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−15%−10%−5%10%15%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
FELG 0.18%, better
QDVO 0.56%
Fund size
FELG $5.78B
QDVO $751M
1Y total return
FELG −0.5%
QDVO +6.7%, better
Yield (12M)
FELG 0.37%
QDVO 11.12%, better
Holdings
FELG 133
QDVO 39
Avg volume (30D)
FELG 379K sh, better
QDVO 234K sh
NAV per share
FELG $42.20
QDVO $28.50
52W range

ETF.net Grade

FELG: Cost 99, Risk 51, Mission 82, Tradability 85, Holdings 52, Durability 95. QDVO: Cost 47, Risk 84, Mission not scored, Tradability 61, Holdings 59, Durability 75.
Pillar letters and Scores for FELG, QDVO, with each pillar’s weight
PillarFELGQDVO
Cost30% weightA99HigherC47
Mission25% weightA82Not scored
Risk15% weightC51A84Higher
Tradability15% weightA85HigherB61
Holdings10% weightC52B59Higher
Durability5% weightA95HigherA75

Rank among US Active Growth funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. FELG and QDVO are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Active Growth⁠

Category · 90 funds
See all 90 ›

FELG ranks 4th and QDVO 24th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.

  1. Rank 1AJUSAJPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETFScore 86
  2. Rank 2AGUSEGoldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETFScore 84
  3. Rank 3ALRGCAB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETFScore 81
  4. Rank 4AFELGFidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETFScore 80
  5. Rank 5AGQQQAstoria US Quality Growth Kings ETFScore 77
  6. Rank 24BPGROPutnam Focused Large Cap Growth ETFScore 60
  7. Rank 24BQDVOAmplify CWP Growth & Income ETFScore 60
  8. Rank 27BIWLGNYLI Winslow Large Cap Growth ETFScore 59

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

FELGAFidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

QDVOBAmplify CWP Growth & Income ETF

In short

FELG Active stock-picking on an index-fund budget. FELG charges 0.18% to tilt around the Russell 1000 Growth Index rather than copy it, running a strategy whose track record dates to 2007.

QDVO Most option-income funds chase the payout and let growth ride in back. QDVO flips the order: a concentrated book of U.S. growth stocks first, with call writing used tactically on individual names to generate monthly income second.

Stated mandate

FELG The fund seeks capital appreciation and normally invests at least 80% of its assets in common stocks included in the Russell 1000® Growth Index.

QDVO The actively managed Fund seeks capital appreciation primarily and high current income secondarily. It invests mainly in growth-oriented U.S. equities and tactically writes call options to seek additional income.

Why people hold it

  • FELG 0.18% a year, roughly a third of the typical fee among active US growth-conviction funds.
  • Not a moonshot: at least 80% of assets sit in Russell 1000 Growth constituents across about 110 stocks, so the manager's bets are tilts around a familiar benchmark.fidelity.com
  • One of the strongest implementations in its peer group, and cheaper than most of the other top-graded names there (GUSE and MAGS at 0.30%, LRGC at 0.39%).
  • A multi-billion-dollar fund from Fidelity with steady on-screen liquidity, and it pays quarterly.
  • QDVO Growth leads by mandate. Capital appreciation is the primary objective and income the secondary one, with calls written tactically instead of blanketed across the whole portfolio.
  • A 0.56% expense ratio sits well under the going rate for actively managed option-income ETFs, and matches what Amplify charges on its dividend-side sibling, DIVO.
  • Same Capital Wealth Planning shop that runs DIVO, pointed at growth names instead of dividend payers. It stands among the stronger builds in a crowded option-income field.
  • Pays monthly and changes hands readily, so building or trimming a position doesn't mean fighting the order book.

Worth knowing

  • FELG Concentrated by design: roughly 110 large-cap growth names, so the megacap tech leaders at the top of the Russell 1000 Growth Index drive the ride both ways.
  • Active means the portfolio deviates from the index on purpose, so results can land on either side of it.
  • Not the cheapest seat in the cohort: JUSA runs 0.12%, though its mandate is broad large-cap rather than the growth slice.
  • QDVO Every call written trades away some upside on that holding. Writing selectively limits the drag, but in a sharp growth rally you own less of the run.
  • Launched in 2024, so there's no full market cycle on the tape yet and the risk record is still short.
  • Roughly 40 growth names means a single-stock stumble lands harder here than it would in a broad index fund.

Full FELG profile⁠

Full QDVO profile⁠

FELG vs QDVO Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

FELG vs QDVO Cost

Overpaying QDVO vs FELG

$7,339

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • FELG 0.18%

    $3,749

  • QDVO 0.56%

    $11,088

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • FELG 0.18%
  • QDVO 0.56%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.5K$5K$7.5K$10K$12.5K051015202530QDVO $11,088FELG $3,749

Year by year

YearFELGQDVOOverpaying
10$328$1,006$678
20$1,281$3,855$2,574
30$3,749$11,088$7,339

Expense ratio

  • 0.18%FELG, cheaper
  • 0.56%QDVO
  • Middle half of US Active Growth funds
  • Median 0.55%

FELG cheapest of 90 funds

QDVO 47th cheapest of 90 funds

FELG vs QDVO Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
FELG 0.37%
QDVO 11.12%, better
Payout (12M)
FELG $0.16
QDVO $3.17
Last payment
FELG $0.04
QDVO $0.27
Ex-dividend
FELG Sep 18, 2026
QDVO Oct 29, 2026
Paid on
FELG Sep 22, 2026
QDVO Oct 30, 2026
Frequency
FELG Quarterly
QDVO Monthly

Distribution history

Per share, 2023 to 2026, same scale for both

FELGQuarterly · 14 paymentsAll FELG payments⁠
One bar per payment. 14 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Oct 13, 2023 $0.14; Nov 14, 2023 $0.04; Dec 28, 2023 $0.03; Mar 15, 2024 $0.03; Jun 21, 2024 $0.05; Sep 20, 2024 $0.04; Dec 20, 2024 $0.05; Mar 21, 2025 $0.04; Jun 20, 2025 $0.04; Sep 19, 2025 $0.04; Dec 19, 2025 $0.04; Mar 20, 2026 $0.03; Jun 18, 2026 $0.05; Sep 18, 2026 $0.04. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.2520232026YTD
QDVOMonthly · 26 paymentsAll QDVO payments⁠
One bar per payment. 26 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Sep 27, 2024 $0.15; Oct 30, 2024 $0.15; Nov 27, 2024 $0.17; Dec 30, 2024 $0.28; Jan 30, 2025 $0.19; Feb 27, 2025 $0.20; Mar 28, 2025 $0.21; Apr 29, 2025 $0.23; May 29, 2025 $0.24; Jun 27, 2025 $0.23; Jul 30, 2025 $0.21; Aug 28, 2025 $0.29; Sep 29, 2025 $0.29; Oct 30, 2025 $0.25; Nov 26, 2025 $0.27; Dec 30, 2025 $0.27; Jan 29, 2026 $0.24; Feb 26, 2026 $0.24; Mar 30, 2026 $0.24; Apr 29, 2026 $0.27; May 28, 2026 $0.28; Jun 29, 2026 $0.27; Jul 30, 2026 $0.26; Aug 28, 2026 $0.27; Sep 29, 2026 $0.28; Oct 29, 2026 $0.27. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.2520232026YTD

FELG vs QDVO Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
FELG 16.3%since Dec 2023QDVO 13.7%since Sep 2024
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
FELG 0.93since Dec 2023QDVO 0.98since Sep 2024
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
FELG −23.9%since Nov 2023QDVO −17.7%since Aug 2024
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
FELG 1.23QDVO 1.02

FELG and QDVO in the news

Popular comparisons

  • FELGAvsJUSAA

    Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF · JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.18% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QDVOBvsJUSAA

    Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF · JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.56% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FELGAvsGUSEA

    Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF · Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.18% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QDVOBvsGUSEA

    Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF · Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.56% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FELGAvsLRGCA

    Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF · AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.18% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QDVOBvsLRGCA

    Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF · AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.56% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.