FELG ranks 4th and QDVO 24th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.
FELG vs QDVO
FELG −0.38pt a year
0.18%0.56%
FELG 1.6×the volume
379K234K
FELG vs QDVO Performance
−0.5%+6.7%
- FELG 0.18%, better
- QDVO 0.56%
- FELG $5.78B
- QDVO $751M
- FELG −0.5%
- QDVO +6.7%, better
- FELG 0.37%
- QDVO 11.12%, better
- FELG 133
- QDVO 39
- FELG 379K sh, better
- QDVO 234K sh
- FELG $42.20
- QDVO $28.50
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FELG | QDVO |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A99Higher | C47 |
| Mission | A82 | |
| Risk | C51 | A84Higher |
| Tradability | A85Higher | B61 |
| Holdings | C52 | B59Higher |
| Durability | A95Higher | A75 |
Rank among US Active Growth funds
Same Category. FELG and QDVO are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FELGA
QDVOB
In short
FELG Active stock-picking on an index-fund budget. FELG charges 0.18% to tilt around the Russell 1000 Growth Index rather than copy it, running a strategy whose track record dates to 2007.
QDVO Most option-income funds chase the payout and let growth ride in back. QDVO flips the order: a concentrated book of U.S. growth stocks first, with call writing used tactically on individual names to generate monthly income second.
Stated mandate
FELG The fund seeks capital appreciation and normally invests at least 80% of its assets in common stocks included in the Russell 1000® Growth Index.
QDVO The actively managed Fund seeks capital appreciation primarily and high current income secondarily. It invests mainly in growth-oriented U.S. equities and tactically writes call options to seek additional income.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FELG vs QDVO Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FELG vs QDVO Cost
Overpaying QDVO vs FELG
$7,339
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FELG 0.18%
$3,749
QDVO 0.56%
$11,088
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FELG | QDVO | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $328 | $1,006 | $678 |
| 20 | $1,281 | $3,855 | $2,574 |
| 30 | $3,749 | $11,088 | $7,339 |
- 0.18%FELG, cheaper
- 0.56%QDVO
- Middle half of US Active Growth funds
- Median 0.55%
FELG cheapest of 90 funds
QDVO 47th cheapest of 90 funds
FELG vs QDVO Dividends
- FELG 0.37%
- QDVO 11.12%, better
- FELG $0.16
- QDVO $3.17
- FELG $0.04
- QDVO $0.27
- FELG Sep 18, 2026
- QDVO Oct 29, 2026
- FELG Sep 22, 2026
- QDVO Oct 30, 2026
- FELG Quarterly
- QDVO Monthly
Distribution history
FELG vs QDVO Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FELG 16.3%QDVO 13.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- FELG 0.93QDVO 0.98
- Worst fall
- FELG −23.9%QDVO −17.7%
- Market sensitivity
- FELG 1.23QDVO 1.02
FELG and QDVO in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.18% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.56% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.56% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.56% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
