GUSE ranks 2nd and QDVO 24th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.
GUSE vs QDVO
GUSE −0.26pt a year
0.30%0.56%
QDVO 9.4×the volume
24.9K234K
GUSE vs QDVO Performance
+11.8%+7.5%
- GUSE 0.30%, better
- QDVO 0.56%
- GUSE $421M
- QDVO $751M
- GUSE
- QDVO +6.7%
- GUSE
- QDVO 11.12%
- GUSE 122
- QDVO 39
- GUSE 24.9K sh
- QDVO 234K sh, better
- GUSE $46.05
- QDVO $28.50
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GUSE | QDVO |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A97Higher | C47 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | A94Higher | A84 |
| Tradability | C46 | B61Higher |
| Holdings | A89Higher | B59 |
| Durability | A85Higher | A75 |
Rank among US Active Growth funds
Same Category. GUSE and QDVO are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GUSEA
QDVOB
In short
GUSE Goldman's fundamental stock pickers hunting long-term growth in US companies, for 0.30% a year. The strategy dates to 2008 and charges well under the typical active US growth fund.
QDVO Most option-income funds chase the payout and let growth ride in back. QDVO flips the order: a concentrated book of U.S. growth stocks first, with call writing used tactically on individual names to generate monthly income second.
Stated mandate
GUSE The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital by investing in companies that the Investment Adviser believes are positioned for long-term growth.
QDVO The actively managed Fund seeks capital appreciation primarily and high current income secondarily. It invests mainly in growth-oriented U.S. equities and tactically writes call options to seek additional income.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GUSE vs QDVO Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GUSE vs QDVO Cost
Overpaying QDVO vs GUSE
$4,939
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GUSE 0.30%
$6,149
QDVO 0.56%
$11,088
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GUSE | QDVO | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $545 | $1,006 | $461 |
| 20 | $2,113 | $3,855 | $1,742 |
| 30 | $6,149 | $11,088 | $4,939 |
- 0.30%GUSE, cheaper
- 0.56%QDVO
- Middle half of US Active Growth funds
- Median 0.55%
GUSE 3rd cheapest of 90 funds
QDVO 47th cheapest of 90 funds
GUSE vs QDVO Dividends
- GUSE
- QDVO 11.12%
- GUSE
- QDVO $3.17
- GUSE $0.30
- QDVO $0.27
- GUSE Dec 23, 2025
- QDVO Oct 29, 2026
- GUSE Dec 30, 2025
- QDVO Oct 30, 2026
- GUSE Irregular
- QDVO Monthly
Distribution history
GUSE vs QDVO Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GUSE QDVO 13.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- GUSE QDVO 0.98
- Worst fall
- GUSE QDVO −17.7%
- Market sensitivity
- GUSE 0.93QDVO 1.02
Popular comparisons
- 0.30% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.56% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.56% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.56% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.