Skip to content

GUSE vs QDVO

Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

GUSEANasdaq

Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF

QDVOBNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

GUSE −0.26pt a year

GUSE0.30%QDVO0.56%

Avg volume · 30D

QDVO 9.4×the volume

GUSE24.9KQDVO234K

GUSE vs QDVO Performance

Dec 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+11.8%GUSE+7.5%QDVO

Dec 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. GUSE +11.8%. QDVO +7.5%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−5%0%5%15%Dec 2025Jun 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
GUSE 0.30%, better
QDVO 0.56%
Fund size
GUSE $421M
QDVO $751M
1Y total return
GUSE No data
QDVO +6.7%
Yield (12M)
GUSE No data
QDVO 11.12%
Holdings
GUSE 122
QDVO 39
Avg volume (30D)
GUSE 24.9K sh
QDVO 234K sh, better
NAV per share
GUSE $46.05
QDVO $28.50
52W range

ETF.net Grade

GUSE: Cost 97, Risk 94, Mission not scored, Tradability 46, Holdings 89, Durability 85. QDVO: Cost 47, Risk 84, Mission not scored, Tradability 61, Holdings 59, Durability 75.
Pillar letters and Scores for GUSE, QDVO, with each pillar’s weight
PillarGUSEQDVO
Cost30% weightA97HigherC47
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightA94HigherA84
Tradability15% weightC46B61Higher
Holdings10% weightA89HigherB59
Durability5% weightA85HigherA75

Rank among US Active Growth funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. GUSE and QDVO are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Active Growth⁠

Category · 90 funds
See all 90 ›

GUSE ranks 2nd and QDVO 24th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.

  1. Rank 1AJUSAJPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETFScore 86
  2. Rank 2AGUSEGoldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETFScore 84
  3. Rank 3ALRGCAB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETFScore 81
  4. Rank 24BPGROPutnam Focused Large Cap Growth ETFScore 60
  5. Rank 24BQDVOAmplify CWP Growth & Income ETFScore 60
  6. Rank 27BIWLGNYLI Winslow Large Cap Growth ETFScore 59

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

GUSEAGoldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

QDVOBAmplify CWP Growth & Income ETF

In short

GUSE Goldman's fundamental stock pickers hunting long-term growth in US companies, for 0.30% a year. The strategy dates to 2008 and charges well under the typical active US growth fund.

QDVO Most option-income funds chase the payout and let growth ride in back. QDVO flips the order: a concentrated book of U.S. growth stocks first, with call writing used tactically on individual names to generate monthly income second.

Stated mandate

GUSE The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital by investing in companies that the Investment Adviser believes are positioned for long-term growth.

QDVO The actively managed Fund seeks capital appreciation primarily and high current income secondarily. It invests mainly in growth-oriented U.S. equities and tactically writes call options to seek additional income.

Why people hold it

  • GUSE Charges 0.30% a year, against a 0.54% median for its active US growth cohort. Cheap, for stock picking.
  • Actively run with no index to shadow. Managers hold companies they judge positioned for long-term growth, so the portfolio can look different from a large-cap benchmark.
  • Inception dates to 2008, so the strategy has run through multiple market cycles, not one long rally.
  • One of the stronger implementations in a crowded field of active US growth funds.
  • QDVO Growth leads by mandate. Capital appreciation is the primary objective and income the secondary one, with calls written tactically instead of blanketed across the whole portfolio.
  • A 0.56% expense ratio sits well under the going rate for actively managed option-income ETFs, and matches what Amplify charges on its dividend-side sibling, DIVO.
  • Same Capital Wealth Planning shop that runs DIVO, pointed at growth names instead of dividend payers. It stands among the stronger builds in a crowded option-income field.
  • Pays monthly and changes hands readily, so building or trimming a position doesn't mean fighting the order book.

Worth knowing

  • GUSE Trades thinly next to the category's heavyweights. Spreads can be wider, which bites most on large or hurried orders.
  • Two peers in the same top tier undercut it on fee: JUSA at 0.12% and FELG at 0.18%. Price is not where this one stands out.
  • Distributions land once or twice a year, not monthly. Growth of capital is the stated goal, not an income stream.
  • QDVO Every call written trades away some upside on that holding. Writing selectively limits the drag, but in a sharp growth rally you own less of the run.
  • Launched in 2024, so there's no full market cycle on the tape yet and the risk record is still short.
  • Roughly 40 growth names means a single-stock stumble lands harder here than it would in a broad index fund.

Full GUSE profile⁠

Full QDVO profile⁠

GUSE vs QDVO Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

GUSE vs QDVO Cost

Overpaying QDVO vs GUSE

$4,939

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • GUSE 0.30%

    $6,149

  • QDVO 0.56%

    $11,088

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • GUSE 0.30%
  • QDVO 0.56%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.5K$5K$7.5K$10K$12.5K051015202530QDVO $11,088GUSE $6,149

Year by year

YearGUSEQDVOOverpaying
10$545$1,006$461
20$2,113$3,855$1,742
30$6,149$11,088$4,939

Expense ratio

  • 0.30%GUSE, cheaper
  • 0.56%QDVO
  • Middle half of US Active Growth funds
  • Median 0.55%

GUSE 3rd cheapest of 90 funds

QDVO 47th cheapest of 90 funds

GUSE vs QDVO Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
GUSE No data
QDVO 11.12%
Payout (12M)
GUSE No data
QDVO $3.17
Last payment
GUSE $0.30
QDVO $0.27
Ex-dividend
GUSE Dec 23, 2025
QDVO Oct 29, 2026
Paid on
GUSE Dec 30, 2025
QDVO Oct 30, 2026
Frequency
GUSE Irregular
QDVO Monthly

Distribution history

Per share, 2024 to 2026, same scale for both

GUSEIrregular · 1 paymentAll GUSE payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment from 2024 to 2026 YTD. Dec 23, 2025 $0.30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252026YTD
QDVOMonthly · 26 paymentsAll QDVO payments⁠
One bar per payment. 26 payments from 2024 to 2026 YTD. Sep 27, 2024 $0.15; Oct 30, 2024 $0.15; Nov 27, 2024 $0.17; Dec 30, 2024 $0.28; Jan 30, 2025 $0.19; Feb 27, 2025 $0.20; Mar 28, 2025 $0.21; Apr 29, 2025 $0.23; May 29, 2025 $0.24; Jun 27, 2025 $0.23; Jul 30, 2025 $0.21; Aug 28, 2025 $0.29; Sep 29, 2025 $0.29; Oct 30, 2025 $0.25; Nov 26, 2025 $0.27; Dec 30, 2025 $0.27; Jan 29, 2026 $0.24; Feb 26, 2026 $0.24; Mar 30, 2026 $0.24; Apr 29, 2026 $0.27; May 28, 2026 $0.28; Jun 29, 2026 $0.27; Jul 30, 2026 $0.26; Aug 28, 2026 $0.27; Sep 29, 2026 $0.28; Oct 29, 2026 $0.27. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252026YTD

GUSE vs QDVO Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
GUSE No dataQDVO 13.7%since Sep 2024
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
GUSE No dataQDVO 0.98since Sep 2024
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
GUSE No dataQDVO −17.7%since Aug 2024
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
GUSE 0.93QDVO 1.02

Popular comparisons

  • GUSEAvsJUSAA

    Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF · JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QDVOBvsJUSAA

    Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF · JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.56% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GUSEAvsLRGCA

    Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF · AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QDVOBvsLRGCA

    Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF · AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.56% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GUSEAvsFELGA

    Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF · Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QDVOBvsFELGA

    Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF · Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.56% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.