FELG ranks 4th and RILA 42nd of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.
FELG vs RILA
FELG −0.32pt a year
0.18%0.50%
FELG 99.2×the volume
379K3.82K
FELG vs RILA Performance
−1.7%+1.6%
- FELG 0.18%, better
- RILA 0.50%
- FELG $5.78B
- RILA $44M
- FELG −1.7%
- RILA +1.6%, better
- FELG 0.37%, better
- RILA 0.12%
- FELG 132
- RILA 170
- FELG 379K sh, better
- RILA 3.82K sh
- FELG $42.20
- RILA $12.11
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FELG | RILA |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A99Higher | B62 |
| Mission | A82Higher | A74 |
| Risk | C51 | C51 |
| Tradability | A85Higher | F13 |
| Holdings | C52 | A87Higher |
| Durability | A95Higher | D39 |
Rank among US Active Growth funds
Same Category. FELG and RILA are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FELGA
RILAC
In short
FELG Active stock-picking on an index-fund budget. FELG charges 0.18% to tilt around the Russell 1000 Growth Index rather than copy it, running a strategy whose track record dates to 2007.
RILA A 2025-vintage stock picker's fund: actively managed, with at least 80% of assets in US common stocks the adviser thinks can grow. It undercuts the typical fee in its active-growth peer group, and it is still small and thinly traded.
Stated mandate
FELG The fund seeks capital appreciation and normally invests at least 80% of its assets in common stocks included in the Russell 1000® Growth Index.
RILA The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation and is actively managed. It normally invests at least 80% of its assets in common stocks that the adviser believes have growth potential.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FELG vs RILA Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FELG vs RILA Cost
Overpaying RILA vs FELG
$6,230
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FELG 0.18%
$3,749
RILA 0.50%
$9,979
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FELG | RILA | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $328 | $900 | $572 |
| 20 | $1,281 | $3,460 | $2,179 |
| 30 | $3,749 | $9,979 | $6,230 |
- 0.18%FELG, cheaper
- 0.50%RILA
- Middle half of US Active Growth funds
- Median 0.55%
FELG cheapest of 90 funds
RILA 33rd cheapest of 90 funds
FELG vs RILA Dividends
- FELG 0.37%, better
- RILA 0.12%
- FELG $0.16
- RILA $0.01
- FELG $0.04
- RILA $0.002
- FELG Sep 18, 2026
- RILA Sep 29, 2026
- FELG Sep 22, 2026
- RILA Sep 30, 2026
- FELG Quarterly
- RILA Quarterly
Distribution history
FELG vs RILA Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FELG 16.3%RILA 15.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- FELG 0.93RILA 0.38
- Worst fall
- FELG −23.9%RILA −20.0%
- Market sensitivity
- FELG 1.23RILA 1.00
FELG and RILA in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.18% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
