GUSE vs RILA

GUSEAGoldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

RILACIndexperts Gorilla Aggressive Growth ETF

In short

GUSE Goldman's fundamental stock pickers hunting long-term growth in US companies, for 0.30% a year. The strategy dates to 2008 and charges well under the typical active US growth fund.

RILA A 2025-vintage stock picker's fund: actively managed, with at least 80% of assets in US common stocks the adviser thinks can grow. It undercuts the typical fee in its active-growth peer group, and it is still small and thinly traded.

Stated mandate

GUSE The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital by investing in companies that the Investment Adviser believes are positioned for long-term growth.

RILA The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation and is actively managed. It normally invests at least 80% of its assets in common stocks that the adviser believes have growth potential.

Why people hold it

• GUSE Charges 0.30% a year, against a 0.54% median for its active US growth cohort. Cheap, for stock picking.
• Actively run with no index to shadow. Managers hold companies they judge positioned for long-term growth, so the portfolio can look different from a large-cap benchmark.
• Inception dates to 2008, so the strategy has run through multiple market cycles, not one long rally.
• One of the stronger implementations in a crowded field of active US growth funds.

• RILA Costs 0.50% a year, a touch under the median for actively managed US growth ETFs. Human stock picking without a premium price tag.
• Does what the prospectus says: normally at least 80% in US common stocks chosen for growth potential, with the portfolio matching the stated mandate closely.
• The stock-level book is one of its stronger features, and the fund lands in the upper half of its active US growth peer group.
• Pays out quarterly, a standard cadence for an equity fund whose main job is capital appreciation rather than income.

Worth knowing

• GUSE Trades thinly next to the category's heavyweights. Spreads can be wider, which bites most on large or hurried orders.
• Two peers in the same top tier undercut it on fee: JUSA at 0.12% and FELG at 0.18%. Price is not where this one stands out.
• Distributions land once or twice a year, not monthly. Growth of capital is the stated goal, not an income stream.

• RILA Small asset base and thin trading. That usually means wider bid-ask spreads than a mega-fund, which matters most on large or hurried orders.
• Launched in 2025, so the record is short and the risk read rests on limited history rather than a full market cycle.
• Highly rated rivals in the same lane cost far less: JUSA at 0.12% and FELG at 0.18%. Active conviction here is priced above the index-plus alternatives.

Full GUSE profile⁠

Full RILA profile⁠