Skip to content

FELG vs TFGZ

Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

FELGANYSE Arca

Thornburg Focus Growth Fund

TFGZDNasdaq

Overlap

26.7%by weight

Expense ratio

FELG −0.61pt a year

FELG0.18%TFGZ0.79%

Avg volume · 30D

FELG 183.5×the volume

FELG379KTFGZ2.07K

FELG vs TFGZ Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Nov 2, 2026

−1.8%FELG−7.4%TFGZ

Jul 31, 2026 to Nov 2, 2026. FELG −1.8%. TFGZ −7.4%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−5%0%5%10%Jul 2026Sep 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
FELG 0.18%, better
TFGZ 0.79%
Fund size
FELG $5.78B
TFGZ $226M
1Y total return
FELG −1.7%
TFGZ No data
Yield (12M)
FELG 0.37%
TFGZ No data
Holdings
FELG 132
TFGZ 42
Avg volume (30D)
FELG 379K sh, better
TFGZ 2.07K sh
NAV per share
FELG $42.20
TFGZ $33.34
52W range

ETF.net Grade

FELG: Cost 99, Risk 51, Mission 82, Tradability 85, Holdings 52, Durability 95. TFGZ: Cost 13, Risk 73, Mission not scored, Tradability 32, Holdings 72, Durability 39.
Pillar letters and Scores for FELG, TFGZ, with each pillar’s weight
PillarFELGTFGZ
Cost30% weightA99HigherF13
Mission25% weightA82Not scored
Risk15% weightC51A73Higher
Tradability15% weightA85HigherD32
Holdings10% weightC52A72Higher
Durability5% weightA95HigherD39

Rank among US Active Growth funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. FELG and TFGZ are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Active Growth⁠

Category · 90 funds
See all 90 ›

FELG ranks 4th and TFGZ 70th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.

  1. Rank 1AJUSAJPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETFScore 86
  2. Rank 2AGUSEGoldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETFScore 84
  3. Rank 3ALRGCAB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETFScore 81
  4. Rank 4AFELGFidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETFScore 80
  5. Rank 5AGQQQAstoria US Quality Growth Kings ETFScore 77
  6. Rank 70DLCLGLogan Capital Broad Innovative Growth ETFScore 38
  7. Rank 70DTFGZThornburg Focus Growth FundScore 38
  8. Rank 72DBWQGBWM Quality Growth ETFScore 37

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

FELGAFidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

TFGZDThornburg Focus Growth Fund

In short

FELG Active stock-picking on an index-fund budget. FELG charges 0.18% to tilt around the Russell 1000 Growth Index rather than copy it, running a strategy whose track record dates to 2007.

TFGZ Thornburg's 2026 entry in U.S. growth: large-cap names picked one at a time for above-average earnings and cash-flow growth, built bottom-up rather than off a forecast for the economy.

Stated mandate

FELG The fund seeks capital appreciation and normally invests at least 80% of its assets in common stocks included in the Russell 1000® Growth Index.

TFGZ The fund invests mainly in U.S. equities and pursues growth by selecting companies with above-average earnings and cash-flow growth, often emphasizing large-cap issuers. Its portfolio is built bottom-up around individual stock evaluation rather than broad economic-cycle analysis.

Why people hold it

  • FELG 0.18% a year, roughly a third of the typical fee among active US growth-conviction funds.
  • Not a moonshot: at least 80% of assets sit in Russell 1000 Growth constituents across about 110 stocks, so the manager's bets are tilts around a familiar benchmark.fidelity.com
  • One of the strongest implementations in its peer group, and cheaper than most of the other top-graded names there (GUSE and MAGS at 0.30%, LRGC at 0.39%).
  • A multi-billion-dollar fund from Fidelity with steady on-screen liquidity, and it pays quarterly.
  • TFGZ The mandate is specific, not vague 'growth': U.S. companies with above-average earnings and cash-flow growth, with an emphasis on large caps.
  • Bottom-up by design. Each holding is judged on its own numbers rather than slotted in from a view on the economic cycle.
  • Growth is stated up front in the fund's own documents, so the style is declared rather than reverse-engineered from the holdings list.
  • A pure U.S. equity book: no currency translation or foreign market hours layered on top of the stock picking.

Worth knowing

  • FELG Concentrated by design: roughly 110 large-cap growth names, so the megacap tech leaders at the top of the Russell 1000 Growth Index drive the ride both ways.
  • Active means the portfolio deviates from the index on purpose, so results can land on either side of it.
  • Not the cheapest seat in the cohort: JUSA runs 0.12%, though its mandate is broad large-cap rather than the growth slice.
  • TFGZ Costs 0.79% a year, above the 0.54% median for its active U.S. growth peers and well above enhanced-index rivals like JUSA (0.12%) and FELG (0.18%).
  • New in 2026, small, and thinly traded: spreads can run wider than in the category's giants, and there is little history to judge the manager's hand.
  • Built for growth, not income. It has not been paying distributions, so results ride on share price alone.

Full FELG profile⁠

Full TFGZ profile⁠

FELG vs TFGZ Holdings

How FELG and TFGZ differ

Overlap by weight

26.7%

Shared holdings make up 52.8% of TFGZ and 27.6% of FELG.

Level by level

  • Holdings16 in both26.7%
  • Sector11 Sectors78.2%
  • Countryby domicile97.5%
  • Asset classEquity100%

Sector

Sector weights in FELG and TFGZ, widest gap first
SectorMore in FELGMore in TFGZ
TechnologyFELG +18.7 points
FinancialsTFGZ +8.3 points
CommunicationTFGZ +4.1 points
Consumer DiscretionaryFELG +3.1 points
Health CareTFGZ +2.9 points
IndustrialsTFGZ +2.2 points
UtilitiesTFGZ +2.1 points
Consumer StaplesTFGZ +1.4 points
EnergyTFGZ +0.7 points
MaterialsTFGZ +0.1 points
Real EstateFELG +0.1 points

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in FELG and TFGZ, widest gap first
CountryMore in FELGMore in TFGZ
United StatesFELG +2.5 points
CanadaTFGZ +2.5 points

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • FELG57.9%
  • TFGZ46.0%

Securities held

  • FELG131
  • TFGZ41

Asset class

FELG
Equity
TFGZ
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in FELG115
  • In both16
  • Only in TFGZ25

Only in FELG

115 securities, 71.7% of FELG by weight

  • NVIDIA Corp15.38%
  • Apple Inc8.95%
  • Eli Lilly & Co4.15%

Only in TFGZ

25 securities, 45.1% of TFGZ by weight

  • Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd.3.86%
  • Royalty Pharma plc3.40%
  • SiTime Corp.2.72%

Weight gaps

All 16 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in FELG and TFGZ, widest gap first
HoldingMore in FELGMore in TFGZ
Alphabet Inc Class AGOOGLTFGZ +4.21 points
Lam Research CorpLRCXTFGZ +2.92 points
S&P Global IncSPGITFGZ +2.74 points
Heico Corp Class AHEI.ATFGZ +2.68 points
Marvell Technology IncMRVLTFGZ +2.53 points
Datadog Inc Class ADDOGTFGZ +2.31 points
Vertiv Holdings CoVRTTFGZ +2.27 points
Mastercard Inc Class AMATFGZ +2.08 points

All 109 FELG holdings⁠All TFGZ holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

FELG vs TFGZ Cost

Overpaying TFGZ vs FELG

$11,425

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • FELG 0.18%

    $3,749

  • TFGZ 0.79%

    $15,174

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • FELG 0.18%
  • TFGZ 0.79%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530TFGZ $15,174FELG $3,749

Year by year

YearFELGTFGZOverpaying
10$328$1,405$1,077
20$1,281$5,331$4,050
30$3,749$15,174$11,425

Expense ratio

  • 0.18%FELG, cheaper
  • 0.79%TFGZ
  • Middle half of US Active Growth funds
  • Median 0.55%

FELG cheapest of 90 funds

TFGZ 78th cheapest of 90 funds

FELG vs TFGZ Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Yield (12M)
FELG 0.37%
TFGZ No data
Payout (12M)
FELG $0.16
TFGZ None
Last payment
FELG $0.04
TFGZ No data
Ex-dividend
FELG Sep 18, 2026
TFGZ No data
Paid on
FELG Sep 22, 2026
TFGZ No data
Frequency
FELG Quarterly
TFGZ No data

Distribution history

Per share, 2023 to 2026, same scale for both

FELGQuarterly · 14 paymentsAll FELG payments⁠
One bar per payment. 14 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Oct 13, 2023 $0.14; Nov 14, 2023 $0.04; Dec 28, 2023 $0.03; Mar 15, 2024 $0.03; Jun 21, 2024 $0.05; Sep 20, 2024 $0.04; Dec 20, 2024 $0.05; Mar 21, 2025 $0.04; Jun 20, 2025 $0.04; Sep 19, 2025 $0.04; Dec 19, 2025 $0.04; Mar 20, 2026 $0.03; Jun 18, 2026 $0.05; Sep 18, 2026 $0.04. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.1020232026YTD
TFGZAll TFGZ payments⁠

No distribution history available.

FELG vs TFGZ Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
FELG 16.3%since Dec 2023TFGZ No data
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
FELG 0.93since Dec 2023TFGZ No data
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
FELG −23.9%since Nov 2023TFGZ No data
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
FELG 1.23TFGZ 1.33

FELG and TFGZ in the news

Popular comparisons

  • FELGAvsJUSAA

    Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF · JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.18% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TFGZDvsJUSAA

    Thornburg Focus Growth Fund · JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FELGAvsGUSEA

    Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF · Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.18% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TFGZDvsGUSEA

    Thornburg Focus Growth Fund · Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FELGAvsLRGCA

    Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF · AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.18% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TFGZDvsLRGCA

    Thornburg Focus Growth Fund · AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.