JUSA ranks 1st and TFGZ 70th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.
JUSA vs TFGZ
JUSA −0.61pt a year
0.18%0.79%
JUSA 47.8×the volume
98.8K2.07K
JUSA vs TFGZ Performance
0.0%−7.4%
- JUSA 0.18%, better
- TFGZ 0.79%
- JUSA $745M
- TFGZ $226M
- JUSA +10.3%
- TFGZ
- JUSA 0.72%
- TFGZ
- JUSA 265
- TFGZ 42
- JUSA 98.8K sh, better
- TFGZ 2.07K sh
- JUSA $67.75
- TFGZ $33.34
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | JUSA | TFGZ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A99Higher | F13 |
| Mission | A84 | |
| Risk | A92Higher | A73 |
| Tradability | B59Higher | D32 |
| Holdings | A83Higher | A72 |
| Durability | A76Higher | D39 |
Rank among US Active Growth funds
Same Category. JUSA and TFGZ are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
JUSAA
TFGZD
In short
JUSA Active stock picking in index clothing: J.P. Morgan analysts tilt roughly 300 large caps while sector weights and risk stay close to the S&P 500, for 0.18% a year with no waiver attached.
TFGZ Thornburg's 2026 entry in U.S. growth: large-cap names picked one at a time for above-average earnings and cash-flow growth, built bottom-up rather than off a forecast for the economy.
Stated mandate
JUSA The fund seeks capital appreciation through active, fundamental, bottom-up selection of large-cap U.S. equities. It targets companies with strong long-term earnings potential and attractive valuations relative to peers.
TFGZ The fund invests mainly in U.S. equities and pursues growth by selecting companies with above-average earnings and cash-flow growth, often emphasizing large-cap issuers. Its portfolio is built bottom-up around individual stock evaluation rather than broad economic-cycle analysis.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
JUSA vs TFGZ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
JUSA vs TFGZ Cost
Overpaying TFGZ vs JUSA
$11,425
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
JUSA 0.18%
$3,749
TFGZ 0.79%
$15,174
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | JUSA | TFGZ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $328 | $1,405 | $1,077 |
| 20 | $1,281 | $5,331 | $4,050 |
| 30 | $3,749 | $15,174 | $11,425 |
- 0.18%JUSA, cheaper
- 0.79%TFGZ
- Middle half of US Active Growth funds
- Median 0.55%
JUSA cheapest of 90 funds
TFGZ 78th cheapest of 90 funds
JUSA vs TFGZ Dividends
- JUSA 0.72%
- TFGZ
- JUSA $0.49
- TFGZ None
- JUSA $0.13
- TFGZ
- JUSA Sep 22, 2026
- TFGZ
- JUSA Sep 24, 2026
- TFGZ
- JUSA Quarterly
- TFGZ
Distribution history
JUSA vs TFGZ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- JUSA 11.6%TFGZ
- Return per unit of risk
- JUSA 1.41TFGZ
- Worst fall
- JUSA −14.0%TFGZ
- Market sensitivity
- JUSA 0.98TFGZ 1.33
JUSA and TFGZ in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.18% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

