QLVE ranks 7th and FEMS 17th of 20 funds in the Emerging Markets Multifactor Category.
FEMS vs QLVE
QLVE −0.62pt a year
0.80%0.18%
FEMS 93.7×the volume
37.9K404
QLVE +3.1pt
+3.9%+7.0%
FEMS vs QLVE Performance
+20.9%+40.2%
- FEMS 0.80%
- QLVE 0.18%, better
- FEMS $195M
- QLVE $16M
- FEMS −2.0%
- QLVE +11.2%, better
- FEMS 4.52%, better
- QLVE 3.17%
- FEMS 211
- QLVE 155
- FEMS 37.9K sh, better
- QLVE 404 sh
- FEMS $39.84
- QLVE $32.48
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FEMS | QLVE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F3 | A100Higher |
| Mission | A93 | |
| Risk | F24 | B66Higher |
| Tradability | B65Higher | F11 |
| Holdings | A74Higher | D32 |
| Durability | B67Higher | D33 |
Rank among Emerging Markets Multifactor funds
Same Category. FEMS and QLVE are both graded against the same 20 Emerging Markets Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FEMSD
QLVEB
In short
FEMS Emerging market small caps, chosen by First Trust's AlphaDEX growth-and-value rules instead of ranked by size. A narrow, off-the-beaten-path slice of EM that has been running since 2012.
QLVE Most emerging-markets factor funds chase value. QLVE goes the other way: cut the weakest fifth on quality, then optimize what is left toward lower volatility. Cost is 0.18% net of a waiver through March 1, 2027.
Stated mandate
FEMS The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the Nasdaq AlphaDEX® Emerging Markets Small CapTM Index.
QLVE The Fund is designed for investors seeking emerging-markets exposure with an emphasis on quality and low volatility. It seeks to match, before fees and expenses, the performance of the Northern Trust Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FEMS vs QLVE Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FEMS vs QLVE Cost
Overpaying FEMS vs QLVE
$11,597
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FEMS 0.80%
$15,346
QLVE 0.18%
$3,749
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FEMS | QLVE | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,422 | $328 | $1,094 |
| 20 | $5,393 | $1,281 | $4,112 |
| 30 | $15,346 | $3,749 | $11,597 |
- 0.80%FEMS
- 0.18%QLVE, cheaper
- Middle half of Emerging Markets Multifactor funds
- Median 0.44%
QLVE cheapest of 20 funds
FEMS 19th cheapest of 20 funds
FEMS vs QLVE Dividends
- FEMS 4.52%, better
- QLVE 3.17%
- FEMS $1.80
- QLVE $1.02
- FEMS $0.40
- QLVE $0.34
- FEMS Sep 24, 2026
- QLVE Sep 18, 2026
- FEMS Sep 30, 2026
- QLVE Sep 24, 2026
- FEMS Quarterly
- QLVE Quarterly
Distribution history
FEMS vs QLVE Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FEMS
- QLVE
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FEMS 14.2%QLVE 11.0%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- FEMS 0.29QLVE 1.11, better
- Worst fall
- FEMS −21.2%, betterQLVE −23.6%
- Market sensitivity
- FEMS 0.61QLVE 0.83
Popular comparisons
- 0.80% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.80% · 0.36%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.36%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.80% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.