Skip to content

FEMS vs QLVE

First Trust Emerging Markets Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund

FEMSDNasdaq

Northern Trust Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility ETF

QLVEBNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

QLVE −0.62pt a year

FEMS0.80%QLVE0.18%

Avg volume · 30D

FEMS 93.7×the volume

FEMS37.9KQLVE404

5Y return · a year

QLVE +3.1pt

FEMS+3.9%QLVE+7.0%

FEMS vs QLVE Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

+20.9%FEMS+40.2%QLVE

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. FEMS +20.9%. QLVE +40.2%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
FEMS 0.80%
QLVE 0.18%, better
Fund size
FEMS $195M
QLVE $16M
1Y total return
FEMS −2.0%
QLVE +11.2%, better
Yield (12M)
FEMS 4.52%, better
QLVE 3.17%
Holdings
FEMS 211
QLVE 155
Avg volume (30D)
FEMS 37.9K sh, better
QLVE 404 sh
NAV per share
FEMS $39.84
QLVE $32.48
52W range

ETF.net Grade

FEMS: Cost 3, Risk 24, Mission not scored, Tradability 65, Holdings 74, Durability 67. QLVE: Cost 100, Risk 66, Mission 93, Tradability 11, Holdings 32, Durability 33.
Pillar letters and Scores for FEMS, QLVE, with each pillar’s weight
PillarFEMSQLVE
Cost30% weightF3A100Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredA93
Risk15% weightF24B66Higher
Tradability15% weightB65HigherF11
Holdings10% weightA74HigherD32
Durability5% weightB67HigherD33

Rank among Emerging Markets Multifactor funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. FEMS and QLVE are both graded against the same 20 Emerging Markets Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

See all 20 ›

QLVE ranks 7th and FEMS 17th of 20 funds in the Emerging Markets Multifactor Category.

  1. Rank 6BJPEMJPMorgan Diversified Return Emerging Markets Equity ETFScore 62
  2. Rank 7BQLVENorthern Trust Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility ETFScore 61
  3. Rank 8BROAMHartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETFScore 60
  4. Rank 16DECONColumbia Research Enhanced Emerging Economies ETFScore 36
  5. Rank 17DFEMSFirst Trust Emerging Markets Small Cap AlphaDEX FundScore 33
  6. Rank 18DTLTENorthern Trust Morningstar Emerging Markets Factor Tilt ETFScore 31

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

FEMSDFirst Trust Emerging Markets Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund

QLVEBNorthern Trust Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility ETF

In short

FEMS Emerging market small caps, chosen by First Trust's AlphaDEX growth-and-value rules instead of ranked by size. A narrow, off-the-beaten-path slice of EM that has been running since 2012.

QLVE Most emerging-markets factor funds chase value. QLVE goes the other way: cut the weakest fifth on quality, then optimize what is left toward lower volatility. Cost is 0.18% net of a waiver through March 1, 2027.

Stated mandate

FEMS The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the Nasdaq AlphaDEX® Emerging Markets Small CapTM Index.

QLVE The Fund is designed for investors seeking emerging-markets exposure with an emphasis on quality and low volatility. It seeks to match, before fees and expenses, the performance of the Northern Trust Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index.

Why people hold it

  • FEMS Goes small in emerging markets: roughly 220 stocks, so no single name or state champion carries the fund.
  • AlphaDEX picks and weights by growth and value rank, not market cap, so the biggest company in the index isn't automatically the biggest position.ftportfolios.com
  • Live since 2012, with the same rules-based index mandate through multiple EM cycles. Pays quarterly.
  • Holdings are spread widely enough that the portfolio reads as a genuine small-cap basket rather than a handful of bets.
  • QLVE At 0.18% net of a waiver through March 1, 2027, it undercuts every top-scoring fund in its peer group, including EMGF at 0.26% and FDEM at 0.25%.
  • The index cuts the lowest-quality fifth of emerging-markets large and mid caps on profitability, cash flow and capital deployment, then optimizes the rest for lower volatility.flexshares.comnortherntrust.com
  • Sector, industry and country weights are held within set bands of the parent benchmark and turnover is capped near 12% a rebalance, curbing the sector drift low-vol screens invite.northerntrust.comsec.gov
  • Sits in the upper half of its emerging-markets factor peer group and has stayed close to its stated index.

Worth knowing

  • FEMS Cost is the sore spot: 0.80% a year, well above EM factor peers such as EMGF (0.26%) and AVES (0.36%). That gap compounds against you.
  • Thinly traded. Spreads can widen, and large orders can move the price more than in the big EM funds.
  • Small caps plus emerging markets is a bumpy combination, and this has been among the more volatile funds in its peer group.
  • QLVE Thinly traded with a small asset base, so spreads can run wider than the category heavyweights and limit orders matter more.
  • Roughly 160 holdings with meaningful weight in the largest names, so it is more top-heavy than a broad emerging-markets index fund.
  • Lower volatility is the design goal, not an outcome the fund controls: the index aims to be calmer than its parent, and the fund tracks it either way.sec.govflexshares.com

Full FEMS profile⁠

Full QLVE profile⁠

FEMS vs QLVE Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

FEMS vs QLVE Cost

Overpaying FEMS vs QLVE

$11,597

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • FEMS 0.80%

    $15,346

  • QLVE 0.18%

    $3,749

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • FEMS 0.80%
  • QLVE 0.18%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530FEMS $15,346QLVE $3,749

Year by year

YearFEMSQLVEOverpaying
10$1,422$328$1,094
20$5,393$1,281$4,112
30$15,346$3,749$11,597

Expense ratio

  • 0.80%FEMS
  • 0.18%QLVE, cheaper
  • Middle half of Emerging Markets Multifactor funds
  • Median 0.44%

QLVE cheapest of 20 funds

FEMS 19th cheapest of 20 funds

FEMS vs QLVE Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
FEMS 4.52%, better
QLVE 3.17%
Payout (12M)
FEMS $1.80
QLVE $1.02
Last payment
FEMS $0.40
QLVE $0.34
Ex-dividend
FEMS Sep 24, 2026
QLVE Sep 18, 2026
Paid on
FEMS Sep 30, 2026
QLVE Sep 24, 2026
Frequency
FEMS Quarterly
QLVE Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

FEMSQuarterly · 37 paymentsAll FEMS payments⁠
One bar per payment. 37 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Jun 22, 2017 $0.29; Sep 21, 2017 $0.74; Dec 21, 2017 $0.44; Mar 22, 2018 $0.18; Jun 21, 2018 $0.49; Sep 14, 2018 $0.42; Dec 18, 2018 $0.41; Jun 14, 2019 $0.38; Sep 25, 2019 $0.70; Dec 13, 2019 $0.65; Mar 26, 2020 $0.18; Jun 25, 2020 $0.34; Sep 24, 2020 $0.42; Dec 24, 2020 $0.25; Mar 25, 2021 $0.51; Jun 24, 2021 $0.43; Sep 23, 2021 $0.73; Dec 23, 2021 $0.84; Mar 25, 2022 $0.12; Jun 24, 2022 $0.81; Sep 23, 2022 $0.75; Dec 23, 2022 $0.09; Mar 24, 2023 $0.10; Jun 27, 2023 $0.66; Sep 22, 2023 $0.65; Dec 22, 2023 $0.37; Mar 21, 2024 $0.17; Jun 27, 2024 $0.54; Sep 26, 2024 $0.34; Dec 13, 2024 $0.45; Mar 27, 2025 $0.09; Jun 26, 2025 $0.52; Sep 25, 2025 $0.53; Dec 12, 2025 $0.65; Mar 26, 2026 $0.30; Jun 25, 2026 $0.45; Sep 24, 2026 $0.40. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502017202020232026YTD
QLVEQuarterly · 26 paymentsAll QLVE payments⁠
One bar per payment. 26 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Sep 20, 2019 $0.11; Dec 20, 2019 $0.23; Mar 20, 2020 $0.0066; Jun 19, 2020 $0.17; Sep 18, 2020 $0.24; Dec 18, 2020 $0.03; Jun 18, 2021 $0.18; Sep 17, 2021 $0.24; Dec 17, 2021 $0.25; Jun 17, 2022 $0.17; Sep 16, 2022 $0.32; Dec 16, 2022 $0.06; Mar 17, 2023 $0.06; Jun 16, 2023 $0.15; Sep 15, 2023 $0.40; Dec 15, 2023 $0.09; Jun 21, 2024 $0.16; Sep 20, 2024 $0.09; Dec 20, 2024 $0.52; Mar 21, 2025 $0.09; Jun 20, 2025 $0.20; Sep 19, 2025 $0.21; Dec 19, 2025 $0.43; Dec 24, 2025 $0.0056; Jun 18, 2026 $0.24; Sep 18, 2026 $0.34. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502017202020232026YTD

FEMS vs QLVE Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • FEMS
  • QLVE
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: QLVE −23.6% · Oct 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%−15%−10%−5%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
FEMS 14.2%QLVE 11.0%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
FEMS 0.29QLVE 1.11, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
FEMS −21.2%, betterQLVE −23.6%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
FEMS 0.61QLVE 0.83

Popular comparisons

  • FEMSDvsEMGFA

    First Trust Emerging Markets Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund · iShares Emerging Markets Equity Factor ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.80% · 0.26%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QLVEBvsEMGFA

    Northern Trust Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility ETF · iShares Emerging Markets Equity Factor ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.18% · 0.26%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FEMSDvsAVESA

    First Trust Emerging Markets Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund · Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.80% · 0.36%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QLVEBvsAVESA

    Northern Trust Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility ETF · Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.18% · 0.36%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FEMSDvsFDEMA

    First Trust Emerging Markets Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund · Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.80% · 0.25%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QLVEBvsFDEMA

    Northern Trust Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility ETF · Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.18% · 0.25%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.