WLTG ranks 2nd and FFND 6th of 8 funds in the Global Active Growth Category.
FFND vs WLTG
WLTG −0.24pt a year
0.98%0.74%
WLTG 1.1×the volume
8.76K9.39K
WLTG +1.3pt
+22.4%+23.7%
FFND vs WLTG Performance
+4.8%+10.5%
- FFND 0.98%
- WLTG 0.74%, better
- FFND $94M
- WLTG $77M
- FFND +4.8%
- WLTG +10.5%, better
- FFND 0.62%
- WLTG 4.09%, better
- FFND 83
- WLTG 41
- FFND 8.76K sh
- WLTG 9.39K sh, better
- FFND $31.49
- WLTG $38.18
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FFND | WLTG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F7 | B57Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B56 | B61Higher |
| Tradability | B67Higher | B61 |
| Holdings | A74Higher | C46 |
| Durability | C52Higher | C51 |
Rank among Global Active Growth funds
Same Category. FFND and WLTG are both graded against the same 8 Global Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FFNDC
WLTGB
In short
FFND An active global stock picker with a lever most equity ETFs lack: short positions, used to hedge or pursue returns in falling markets. Roughly 90 holdings, a 0.98% expense ratio, and a 2025 overhaul that renamed it and widened the map.
WLTG A growth fund with an escape hatch. Three quarters is a concentrated book of 25 to 35 large-cap names; the rest follows a trend model that can rotate into gold, Treasuries, cash or an inverse ETF when the signal turns negative.
Stated mandate
FFND The Fund seeks capital appreciation through active investing. Its strategy may include short positions in equity securities for hedging or to pursue returns in declining markets.
WLTG The Fund seeks long-term capital growth and has a secondary objective of providing dividend income.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FFND vs WLTG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FFND vs WLTG Cost
Overpaying FFND vs WLTG
$4,055
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FFND 0.98%
$18,362
WLTG 0.74%
$14,307
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FFND | WLTG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,729 | $1,319 | $410 |
| 20 | $6,504 | $5,015 | $1,489 |
| 30 | $18,362 | $14,307 | $4,055 |
- 0.98%FFND
- 0.74%WLTG, cheaper
- Middle half of Global Active Growth funds
- Median 0.79%
WLTG 3rd cheapest of 8 funds
FFND 8th cheapest of 8 funds
FFND vs WLTG Dividends
- FFND 0.62%
- WLTG 4.09%, better
- FFND $0.20
- WLTG $1.54
- FFND $0.20
- WLTG $1.54
- FFND Dec 26, 2025
- WLTG Dec 24, 2025
- FFND Dec 30, 2025
- WLTG Dec 26, 2025
- FFND Irregular
- WLTG Annual
Distribution history
FFND vs WLTG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FFND 14.6%WLTG 12.1%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- FFND 1.17WLTG 1.47, better
- Worst fall
- FFND −47.8%WLTG −25.1%
- Market sensitivity
- FFND 1.10WLTG 0.90
Popular comparisons
- 0.98% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.98% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.98% · 0.70%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.70%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.