CGGO ranks 1st and FFND 6th of 8 funds in the Global Active Growth Category.
CGGO vs FFND
CGGO −0.51pt a year
0.47%0.98%
CGGO 137.3×the volume
1.2M8.76K
FFND +2.5pt
+19.9%+22.4%
CGGO vs FFND Performance
+8.6%+4.8%
- CGGO 0.47%, better
- FFND 0.98%
- CGGO $11.9B
- FFND $94M
- CGGO +8.6%, better
- FFND +4.8%
- CGGO 1.06%, better
- FFND 0.62%
- CGGO 108
- FFND 83
- CGGO 1.2M sh, better
- FFND 8.76K sh
- CGGO $37.50
- FFND $31.49
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CGGO | FFND |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A91Higher | F7 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | D35 | B56Higher |
| Tradability | B63 | B67Higher |
| Holdings | A77Higher | A74 |
| Durability | A84Higher | C52 |
Rank among Global Active Growth funds
Same Category. CGGO and FFND are both graded against the same 8 Global Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CGGOA
FFNDC
In short
CGGO Capital Group's global stock-pickers, wrapped in an ETF: about 100 growth companies picked one at a time, at home and abroad, for 0.47% when the typical active rival in its group charges 0.85%.
FFND An active global stock picker with a lever most equity ETFs lack: short positions, used to hedge or pursue returns in falling markets. Roughly 90 holdings, a 0.98% expense ratio, and a 2025 overhaul that renamed it and widened the map.
Stated mandate
CGGO The fund seeks long-term growth of capital by investing primarily in common stocks and cash or money market instruments. Its strategy emphasizes companies with significant growth potential using a bottom-up analysis.
FFND The Fund seeks capital appreciation through active investing. Its strategy may include short positions in equity securities for hedging or to pursue returns in declining markets.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CGGO vs FFND Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CGGO vs FFND Cost
Overpaying FFND vs CGGO
$8,944
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CGGO 0.47%
$9,418
FFND 0.98%
$18,362
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CGGO | FFND | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $847 | $1,729 | $882 |
| 20 | $3,261 | $6,504 | $3,243 |
| 30 | $9,418 | $18,362 | $8,944 |
- 0.47%CGGO, cheaper
- 0.98%FFND
- Middle half of Global Active Growth funds
- Median 0.79%
CGGO cheapest of 8 funds
FFND 8th cheapest of 8 funds
CGGO vs FFND Dividends
- CGGO 1.06%, better
- FFND 0.62%
- CGGO $0.40
- FFND $0.20
- CGGO $0.40
- FFND $0.20
- CGGO Dec 26, 2025
- FFND Dec 26, 2025
- CGGO Dec 29, 2025
- FFND Dec 30, 2025
- CGGO Twice a year
- FFND Irregular
Distribution history
CGGO vs FFND Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CGGO 15.7%FFND 14.6%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- CGGO 0.95FFND 1.17, better
- Worst fall
- CGGO −24.9%FFND −47.8%
- Market sensitivity
- CGGO 1.14FFND 1.10
CGGO and FFND in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.47% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.98% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.47% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.98% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.47% · 0.70%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.98% · 0.70%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
