FITE vs TINY: Grades, Fees and Holdings Compared

State Street SPDR S&P Kensho Future Security ETF

FITEANYSE Arca

ProShares Nanotechnology ETF

TINYCNYSE Arca

Overlap

1.4%by weight

Expense ratio

FITE −0.13pt a year

FITE0.45%TINY0.58%

Avg volume · 30D

TINY 1.7×the volume

FITE7.11KTINY11.8K

5Y return · a year

FITE +5.4pt

FITE+15.7%TINY+10.3%

FITE vs TINY Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

+107.3%FITE+63.0%TINY

Expense ratio: FITE 0.45%, better; TINY 0.58%
Fund size: FITE $161M; TINY $12M
1Y total return: FITE +24.6%, better; TINY +23.3%
Yield (12M): FITE 0.11%, better; TINY 0.10%
Holdings: FITE 79; TINY 31
Avg volume (30D): FITE 7.11K sh; TINY 11.8K sh, better
NAV per share: FITE $115.25; TINY $66.40
52W range

ETF.net Grade

Pillar letters and Scores for FITE, TINY, with each pillar’s weight
Pillar	FITE	TINY
Cost30% weight	A83Higher	C53
Mission25% weight	Not scored	B56
Risk15% weight	A71Higher	D32
Tradability15% weight	A78Higher	C45
Holdings10% weight	A82	Not scored
Durability5% weight	A82Higher	B58

Rank among Global Thematic funds

How we build Categories ›

Same Category. FITE and TINY are both graded against the same 18 Global Thematic funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Global Thematic⁠

Category · 18 funds

See all 18 ›

FITE ranks 1st and TINY 9th of 18 funds in the Global Thematic Category.

Rank 1AFITEState Street SPDR S&P Kensho Future Security ETFScore 79
Rank 2AAGNGGlobal X Aging Population ETFScore 70
Rank 9CPWRDTCW Transform Systems ETFScore 46
Rank 9CTINYProShares Nanotechnology ETFScore 46
Rank 11CPRNTThe 3D Printing ETFScore 42

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

FITEAState Street SPDR S&P Kensho Future Security ETF

TINYCProShares Nanotechnology ETF

In short

FITE Most "security" funds mean cybersecurity. FITE reads the word wider: cyber plus border security, robotics, drones, space, wearables and AR/VR, bundled into one global index basket since 2017.

TINY Nanotechnology is a theme most fund shelves skip entirely. TINY is ProShares' answer: roughly 30 global companies working at the nanoscale, bundled through one Solactive index into a single ticker.

Stated mandate

FITE The fund seeks to track the S&P Kensho Future Security Index, targeting companies whose products and services support future security through areas such as cybersecurity, border security, robotics, drones, space, wearables, and virtual or augmented reality.

TINY TINY invests in companies whose business operations are in nanotechnology, providing exposure to the emerging nanotechnology theme through a global portfolio.

Why people hold it

FITE One theme, many fronts: cybersecurity, border security, robotics, drones, space, wearables and virtual/augmented reality all sit inside the same index.ssga.com
A 0.45% fee undercuts the typical global thematic fund, and it comes from State Street's SPDR lineup rather than a one-fund boutique.
Live since 2017, so it has traded through a full cycle of thematic hype and hangover instead of arriving on a back-test.
Roughly 80 names spread across sectors and countries, so no single defense contractor or chipmaker steers the whole portfolio.ssga.com

TINY Pure-play access to a theme most shelves skip. It tracks the Solactive Nanotechnology Index, built from companies whose business operations sit in nanotechnology.proshares.com
About 30 global holdings, so the theme actually drives the fund instead of sitting as a rounding error inside a broad tech portfolio.
0.58% a year puts it in line with the typical global thematic ETF, even though the mandate is far narrower than most.
ProShares has run it since 2021, it pays quarterly, and it stands in the upper half of its global thematic peer group.

Worth knowing

FITE Thinly traded next to broad index funds, which can mean wider bid-ask spreads at the moment you transact.
Small by SPDR standards. Niche thematic funds lean on sustained investor interest to hold their scale.
"Security" is drawn by index rules, so wearables and AR headset makers land beside the cyber and border names.

TINY Small and thinly traded, which usually means wider bid-ask spreads and more price impact than a mainstream index fund.
About 30 stocks in one emerging theme is a concentrated ride, and it can swing harder than a diversified technology fund.
Broader thematic funds charge less (KLMT at 0.10%, IQSZ at 0.19%), though neither aims at nanotechnology.

Full FITE profile⁠

Full TINY profile⁠

FITE vs TINY Holdings

How FITE and TINY differ

Overlap by weight

1.4%

Shared holdings make up 8.0% of TINY and 1.4% of FITE.

Level by level

Holdings1 in both1.4%
Countryby domicile56.2%
Sector7 Sectors69.3%
Asset classEquity100%

Sector

Sector weights in FITE and TINY, widest gap first
Sector	More in FITEMore in TINY	FITE	TINY
Industrials	FITE +25.9 points	30.1%	4.2%
Technology	TINY +10.6 points	61.3%	71.9%
Materials	TINY +8.2 points	0.0%	8.2%
Health Care	TINY +6.9 points	3.8%	10.7%
Consumer Discretionary	TINY +5.1 points	0.0%	5.1%
Communication	FITE +3.0 points	3.0%	0.0%
Energy	FITE +1.8 points	1.8%	0.0%

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in FITE and TINY, widest gap first
Country	More in FITEMore in TINY	FITE	TINY
United States	FITE +36.7 points	92.2%	55.5%
Japan	TINY +21.5 points	0.0%	21.5%
South Korea	TINY +7.1 points	0.0%	7.1%
Netherlands	TINY +5.6 points	0.0%	5.6%
Taiwan	TINY +4.5 points	0.7%	5.2%
Israel	FITE +4.4 points	4.3%	0.0%
France	TINY +2.9 points	0.0%	2.9%
China	TINY +2.2 points	0.0%	2.2%
Other countries (2)	FITE +2.7 points	2.7%	0.0%

Outside the US: TINY 67% developed, 33% emerging.

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

FITE23.3%
TINY54.2%

Securities held

FITE78
TINY30

Asset class

FITE: Equity
TINY: Equity

Holdings

Only in FITE77
In both1
Only in TINY29

Only in FITE

77 securities, 98.5% of FITE by weight

RAPID7 Inc2.95%
Qualys Inc2.61%
Zscaler Inc2.47%
Tenable Holdings Inc2.42%
Okta Inc2.40%
Rubrik Inc A2.33%
Sentinelone Inc Class A2.16%
N Able Inc2.11%
Crowdstrike Holdings Inc A2.01%
Sailpoint Inc1.87%
Varonis Systems Inc1.85%
Palo Alto Networks Inc1.80%
Onespan Inc1.78%
Cloudflare Inc Class A1.76%
Radware Ltd1.60%
Viasat Inc1.58%
Varex Imaging Corp1.54%
Ziff Davis Inc1.53%
Lockheed Martin Corp1.53%
Check Point Software Tech1.52%
Datadog Inc Class A1.45%
Leidos Holdings Inc1.44%
Gen Digital Inc1.43%
Embraer SA Spon Adr1.41%
Teledyne Technologies Inc1.40%
Rtx Corp1.40%
Ducommun Inc1.36%
Oceaneering Intl Inc1.32%
Blackberry Ltd1.30%
Northrop Grumman Corp1.29%
Heico Corp1.27%
Iridium Communications Inc1.26%
Fortinet Inc1.25%
Elbit Systems Ltd1.23%
Netscout Systems Inc1.22%
Osi Systems Inc1.19%
Moog Inc Class A1.18%
Mirion Technologies Inc1.18%
F5 Inc1.16%
Broadcom Inc1.15%
L3HARRIS Technologies Inc1.14%
Cisco Systems Inc1.14%
Karman Holdings Inc1.13%
Lincoln Electric Holdings1.12%
Kbr Inc1.12%
Amphenol Corp Class A1.10%
Huntington Ingalls Industrie1.09%
Kopin Corp1.09%
Parsons Corp1.09%
General Dynamics Corp1.09%

Only in TINY

29 securities, 91.7% of TINY by weight

Screen Holdings Co Ltd5.59%
Asml Holding NV5.55%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufac5.37%
Nikon Corp5.09%
Entegris Inc5.08%
NVIDIA Corp5.05%
Cabot Corp4.98%
Applied Materials Inc4.81%
Jgc Holdings Corp4.69%
Lam Research Corp4.59%
Jeol Ltd4.25%
Qnity Electronics Inc4.15%
Veeco Instruments Inc3.86%
Axcelis Technologies Inc3.59%
Lg Chem Ltd3.43%
Onto Innovation Inc3.36%
Ultra Clean Holdings Inc3.08%
Nanobiotix2.85%
Nlight Inc2.52%
Shanghai Biren Technology -H2.23%
Park Systems Corp2.15%
Qd Laser Inc1.19%
Wonik Qnc Corp0.95%
Toyo Gosei Co Ltd0.85%
Nve Corp0.69%
Duksan Hi-Metal Co Ltd0.59%
Eikon Therapeutics Inc0.54%
Syntec Optics Holdings Inc0.43%
Jeio Co Ltd0.17%

Weight gaps

All 1 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in FITE and TINY, widest gap first
Holding	More in FITEMore in TINY	FITE	TINY
Bruker CorpBRKR	TINY +6.61 points	1.41%	8.02%

All 78 FITE holdings⁠All 32 TINY holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

FITE vs TINY Cost

Overpaying TINY vs FITE

$2,412

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

FITE 0.45%
$9,041
TINY 0.58%
$11,453

Amount$10,000

Years30 years

Cost over time

FITE 0.45%
TINY 0.58%
Overpaying

Year by year

Year	FITE	TINY	Overpaying
10	$812	$1,041	$229
20	$3,128	$3,986	$858
30	$9,041	$11,453	$2,412

Expense ratio

0.45%FITE, cheaper
0.58%TINY

FITE0.45%TINY0.58%

0.18%0.90%

Middle half of Global Thematic funds
Median 0.58%

FITE 3rd cheapest of 18 funds

TINY 9th cheapest of 18 funds

FITE vs TINY Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026

Yield (12M): FITE 0.11%, better; TINY 0.10%
Payout (12M): FITE $0.12; TINY $0.07
Last payment: FITE $0.04; TINY $0.0083
Ex-dividend: FITE Sep 21, 2026; TINY Jun 24, 2026
Paid on: FITE Sep 23, 2026; TINY Jun 30, 2026
Frequency: FITE Quarterly; TINY Twice a year

Distribution history

Per share, 2018 to 2026, same scale for both

FITEQuarterly · 33 paymentsAll FITE payments⁠

TINYTwice a year · 12 paymentsAll TINY payments⁠

FITE vs TINY Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

FITE
TINY

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years: FITE 21.9%, betterTINY 34.6%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years: FITE 1.26, betterTINY 0.74
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years: FITE −27.1%, betterTINY −43.8%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years: FITE 1.32TINY 1.89; Market = 1

Popular comparisons

FITEAvsAGNGA
State Street SPDR S&P Kensho Future Security ETF · Global X Aging Population ETF
Expense ratio
0.45% · 0.50%
Category
TINYCvsAGNGA
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF · Global X Aging Population ETF
Expense ratio
0.58% · 0.50%
Category
FITEAvsWRNDB
State Street SPDR S&P Kensho Future Security ETF · NYLI Global Equity R&D Leaders ETF
Expense ratio
0.45% · 0.18%
Category
TINYCvsWRNDB
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF · NYLI Global Equity R&D Leaders ETF
Expense ratio
0.58% · 0.18%
Category
FITEAvsICOPB
State Street SPDR S&P Kensho Future Security ETF · iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF
Expense ratio
0.45% · 0.47%
Category
TINYCvsICOPB
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF · iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF
Expense ratio
0.58% · 0.47%
Category