TINY vs WRND: Grades, Fees and Holdings Compared

ProShares Nanotechnology ETF

TINYCNYSE Arca

NYLI Global Equity R&D Leaders ETF

WRNDBNasdaq

Overlap

6.1%by weight

Expense ratio

WRND −0.40pt a year

TINY0.58%WRND0.18%

Avg volume · 30D

TINY 22.2×the volume

TINY11.8KWRND532

3Y return · a year

TINY +4.5pt

TINY+27.1%WRND+22.6%

TINY vs WRND Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+23.3%TINY+9.3%WRND

Expense ratio: TINY 0.58%; WRND 0.18%, better
Fund size: TINY $12M; WRND $11M
1Y total return: TINY +23.3%, better; WRND +9.3%
Yield (12M): TINY 0.10%; WRND 0.97%, better
Holdings: TINY 31; WRND 208
Avg volume (30D): TINY 11.8K sh, better; WRND 532 sh
NAV per share: TINY $66.40; WRND $40.74
52W range

ETF.net Grade

Pillar letters and Scores for TINY, WRND, with each pillar’s weight
Pillar	TINY	WRND
Cost30% weight	C53	A100Higher
Mission25% weight	B56	Not scored
Risk15% weight	D32	A76Higher
Tradability15% weight	C45Higher	F15
Holdings10% weight	Not scored	B58
Durability5% weight	B58Higher	C47

Rank among Global Thematic funds

How we build Categories ›

Same Category. TINY and WRND are both graded against the same 18 Global Thematic funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Global Thematic⁠

Category · 18 funds

See all 18 ›

WRND ranks 3rd and TINY 9th of 18 funds in the Global Thematic Category.

Rank 1AFITEState Street SPDR S&P Kensho Future Security ETFScore 79
Rank 2AAGNGGlobal X Aging Population ETFScore 70
Rank 3BWRNDNYLI Global Equity R&D Leaders ETFScore 69
Rank 4BICOPiShares Copper and Metals Mining ETFScore 68
Rank 9CPWRDTCW Transform Systems ETFScore 46
Rank 9CTINYProShares Nanotechnology ETFScore 46
Rank 11CPRNTThe 3D Printing ETFScore 42

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

TINYCProShares Nanotechnology ETF

WRNDBNYLI Global Equity R&D Leaders ETF

In short

TINY Nanotechnology is a theme most fund shelves skip entirely. TINY is ProShares' answer: roughly 30 global companies working at the nanoscale, bundled through one Solactive index into a single ticker.

WRND Most innovation funds sell you a story. WRND buys receipts: roughly 200 companies worldwide picked on what they actually spend on R&D and whether that spending earns a return, at a fee well under the thematic norm.

Stated mandate

TINY TINY invests in companies whose business operations are in nanotechnology, providing exposure to the emerging nanotechnology theme through a global portfolio.

WRND The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the IQ Global Equity R&D Leaders Index. Its passive strategy targets innovative companies worldwide based on high research and development spending.

Why people hold it

TINY Pure-play access to a theme most shelves skip. It tracks the Solactive Nanotechnology Index, built from companies whose business operations sit in nanotechnology.proshares.com
About 30 global holdings, so the theme actually drives the fund instead of sitting as a rounding error inside a broad tech portfolio.
0.58% a year puts it in line with the typical global thematic ETF, even though the mandate is far narrower than most.
ProShares has run it since 2021, it pays quarterly, and it stands in the upper half of its global thematic peer group.

WRND 0.18% a year against a 0.56% median for its global thematic peers. Innovation exposure without the boutique markup.newyorklifeinvestments.com
Selection leans on the income statement: R&D intensity paired with return on invested capital, favoring firms that turn research budgets into results.newyorklifeinvestments.com
Roughly 200 names from a global universe, one of three R&D-screened funds New York Life launched in 2022 rather than a one-off experiment.businesswire.com

Worth knowing

TINY Small and thinly traded, which usually means wider bid-ask spreads and more price impact than a mainstream index fund.
About 30 stocks in one emerging theme is a concentrated ride, and it can swing harder than a diversified technology fund.
Broader thematic funds charge less (KLMT at 0.10%, IQSZ at 0.19%), though neither aims at nanotechnology.

WRND Small and lightly traded, so bid/ask spreads tend to run wider than on mainstream global index funds.
Weighting by R&D dollars, with a cap on any single position, tilts the book toward the world's largest research spenders.businesswire.com etfstrategy.com
Distributions arrive quarterly, but income isn't the mandate; the index screens on research spending, not payouts.

Full TINY profile⁠

Full WRND profile⁠

TINY vs WRND Holdings

How TINY and WRND differ

Overlap by weight

6.1%

Shared holdings make up 14.4% of TINY and 8.2% of WRND.

Level by level

Holdings3 in both6.1%
Countryby domicile74.9%
Sector9 Sectors77.1%
Asset classEquity100%

Sector

Sector weights in TINY and WRND, widest gap first
Sector	More in TINYMore in WRND	TINY	WRND
Technology	TINY +13.4 points	71.9%	58.5%
Communication	WRND +10.1 points	0.0%	10.1%
Industrials	WRND +8.0 points	4.2%	12.2%
Materials	TINY +7.5 points	8.2%	0.7%
Consumer Discretionary	WRND +4.0 points	5.1%	9.1%
Health Care	TINY +2.2 points	10.7%	8.5%
Consumer Staples	WRND +0.7 points	0.0%	0.7%
Financials	WRND +0.1 points	0.0%	0.1%
Energy	Same weight	0.0%	0.0%

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in TINY and WRND, widest gap first
Country	More in TINYMore in WRND	TINY	WRND
Japan	TINY +21.5 points	21.5%	0.0%
Germany	WRND +6.2 points	0.0%	6.2%
United States	WRND +4.7 points	55.5%	60.2%
Taiwan	WRND +3.5 points	5.2%	8.7%
United Kingdom	WRND +3.2 points	0.0%	3.2%
France	TINY +2.3 points	2.9%	0.6%
Denmark	WRND +1.7 points	0.0%	1.7%
Sweden	WRND +1.3 points	0.0%	1.3%
Other countries (14)	WRND +3.2 points	14.9%	18.1%

Outside the US: TINY 67% developed, 33% emerging. WRND 51% developed, 49% emerging.

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

TINY54.2%
WRND47.1%

Securities held

TINY30
WRND208

Asset class

TINY: Equity
WRND: Equity

Holdings

Only in TINY27
In both3
Only in WRND205

Only in TINY

27 securities, 85.2% of TINY by weight

Bruker Corp8.02%
Screen Holdings Co Ltd5.59%
Asml Holding NV5.55%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufac5.37%
Nikon Corp5.09%
Entegris Inc5.08%
Cabot Corp4.98%
Jgc Holdings Corp4.69%
Jeol Ltd4.25%
Qnity Electronics Inc4.15%
Veeco Instruments Inc3.86%
Axcelis Technologies Inc3.59%
Lg Chem Ltd3.43%
Onto Innovation Inc3.36%
Ultra Clean Holdings Inc3.08%
Nanobiotix2.85%
Nlight Inc2.52%
Shanghai Biren Technology -H2.23%
Park Systems Corp2.15%
Qd Laser Inc1.19%
Wonik Qnc Corp0.95%
Toyo Gosei Co Ltd0.85%
Nve Corp0.69%
Duksan Hi-Metal Co Ltd0.59%
Eikon Therapeutics Inc0.54%
Syntec Optics Holdings Inc0.43%
Jeio Co Ltd0.17%

Only in WRND

205 securities, 91.9% of WRND by weight

Apple Inc.7.26%
Alphabet Inc. Class A5.44%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.4.57%
Microsoft Corporation4.56%
ASML Holding NV4.46%
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.4.05%
Amazon.com, Inc.3.77%
Tesla, Inc.3.12%
Broadcom Inc.2.70%
Meta Platforms Inc Class A2.69%
Eli Lilly and Company2.64%
AstraZeneca PLC2.59%
Sap SE2.26%
Siemens AG2.07%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.1.43%
Eaton Corp. Plc1.28%
Novo Nordisk A/S Class B1.20%
Siemens Energy AG1.09%
GSK plc0.90%
Delta Electronics, Inc.0.83%
Trane Technologies plc0.81%
Vanguard Information Technology ETF0.75%
Palantir Technologies Inc. Class A0.73%
MercadoLibre, Inc.0.73%
Cisco Systems, Inc.0.71%
Oracle Corporation0.68%
iShares Semiconductor ETF0.67%
Netease Inc0.64%
Ferrari NV0.62%
Delta Electronics (Thailand) Public Co. Ltd.0.59%
Infineon Technologies AG0.58%
LG Energy Solution Ltd.0.56%
Palo Alto Networks, Inc.0.52%
Amgen Inc.0.50%
Texas Instruments Incorporated0.47%
Garmin Ltd.0.47%
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. Class A0.45%
Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF0.43%
International Business Machines Corporation0.42%
Constellation Software Inc.0.41%
Elite Material Co., Ltd.0.40%
ASSA ABLOY AB Class B0.37%
PepsiCo, Inc.0.37%
Arista Networks Inc0.36%
Deere & Company0.36%
BeOne Medicines Ltd.0.36%
Legrand SA0.34%
Amphenol Corporation Class A0.34%
Weg SA0.33%
Elbit Systems Ltd0.33%

Weight gaps

All 3 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in TINY and WRND, widest gap first
Holding	More in TINYMore in WRND	TINY	WRND
Applied Materials IncAMAT	TINY +4.28 points	4.81%	0.53%
Lam Research CorpLRCX	TINY +4.07 points	4.59%	0.52%
NVIDIA CorpNVDA	WRND +2.10 points	5.05%	7.15%

All 32 TINY holdings⁠All 209 WRND holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

TINY vs WRND Cost

Overpaying TINY vs WRND

$7,704

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

TINY 0.58%
$11,453
WRND 0.18%
$3,749

Amount$10,000

Years30 years

Cost over time

TINY 0.58%
WRND 0.18%
Overpaying

Year by year

Year	TINY	WRND	Overpaying
10	$1,041	$328	$713
20	$3,986	$1,281	$2,705
30	$11,453	$3,749	$7,704

Expense ratio

0.58%TINY
0.18%WRND, cheaper

WRND0.18%TINY0.58%

0.18%0.90%

Middle half of Global Thematic funds
Median 0.58%

WRND cheapest of 18 funds

TINY 9th cheapest of 18 funds

TINY vs WRND Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026

Yield (12M): TINY 0.10%; WRND 0.97%, better
Payout (12M): TINY $0.07; WRND $0.40
Last payment: TINY $0.0083; WRND $0.10
Ex-dividend: TINY Jun 24, 2026; WRND Sep 30, 2026
Paid on: TINY Jun 30, 2026; WRND Oct 2, 2026
Frequency: TINY Twice a year; WRND Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2021 to 2026, same scale for both

TINYTwice a year · 12 paymentsAll TINY payments⁠

WRNDQuarterly · 18 paymentsAll WRND payments⁠

TINY vs WRND Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years: TINY 34.6%WRND 14.5%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years: TINY 0.74WRND 1.18, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years: TINY −43.8%WRND −27.2%since Feb 2022
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years: TINY 1.89WRND 1.15; Market = 1

Popular comparisons

TINYCvsFITEA
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Kensho Future Security ETF
Expense ratio
0.58% · 0.45%
Category
WRNDBvsFITEA
NYLI Global Equity R&D Leaders ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Kensho Future Security ETF
Expense ratio
0.18% · 0.45%
Category
TINYCvsAGNGA
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF · Global X Aging Population ETF
Expense ratio
0.58% · 0.50%
Category
WRNDBvsAGNGA
NYLI Global Equity R&D Leaders ETF · Global X Aging Population ETF
Expense ratio
0.18% · 0.50%
Category
TINYCvsICOPB
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF · iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF
Expense ratio
0.58% · 0.47%
Category
WRNDBvsICOPB
NYLI Global Equity R&D Leaders ETF · iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF
Expense ratio
0.18% · 0.47%
Category