FLCA ranks 1st and IZRL 29th of 38 funds in the Developed Single Country Category.
FLCA vs IZRL
FLCA −0.40pt a year
0.09%0.49%
FLCA 5.5×the volume
49K8.98K
FLCA +13.7pt
+11.7%−2.0%
FLCA vs IZRL Performance
+73.7%−9.7%
- FLCA 0.09%, better
- IZRL 0.49%
- FLCA $857M
- IZRL $134M
- FLCA +21.5%, better
- IZRL −4.5%
- FLCA 1.70%
- IZRL 2.88%, better
- FLCA 92
- IZRL 66
- FLCA 49K sh, better
- IZRL 8.98K sh
- FLCA $54.21
- IZRL $27.30
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FLCA | IZRL |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A93Higher | B55 |
| Mission | B65Higher | C41 |
| Risk | A87Higher | F24 |
| Tradability | B69Higher | F21 |
| Holdings | A81Higher | A70 |
| Durability | C53Higher | D38 |
Rank among Developed Single Country funds
Same Category. FLCA and IZRL are both graded against the same 38 Developed Single Country funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FLCAA
IZRLC
In short
FLCA Canada in one ticker, at index-fund pricing. FLCA tracks the FTSE Canada Capped Index, about 50 large- and mid-cap Canadian names, for 0.09% a year.
IZRL ARK's odd one out. Instead of Cathie Wood's team picking stocks, IZRL follows a rules-based index of Israeli-incorporated innovators, equally weighted so the small names carry the same load as the household ones.
Stated mandate
FLCA The fund seeks to track the FTSE Canada Capped Index, which measures the performance of Canadian large- and mid-capitalization stocks.
IZRL IZRL seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the ARK Israeli Innovation Index. The index targets exchange-listed Israeli companies whose operations pursue disruptive innovation across genomics, health care, biotechnology, industrials, manufacturing, the Internet, and information technology.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FLCA vs IZRL Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FLCA vs IZRL Cost
Overpaying IZRL vs FLCA
$7,894
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FLCA 0.09%
$1,898
IZRL 0.49%
$9,792
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FLCA | IZRL | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $165 | $883 | $718 |
| 20 | $646 | $3,394 | $2,748 |
| 30 | $1,898 | $9,792 | $7,894 |
- 0.09%FLCA, cheaper
- 0.49%IZRL
- Middle half of Developed Single Country funds
- Median 0.50%
FLCA cheapest of 38 funds
IZRL 10th cheapest of 38 funds
FLCA vs IZRL Dividends
- FLCA 1.70%
- IZRL 2.88%, better
- FLCA $0.92
- IZRL $0.78
- FLCA $0.39
- IZRL $0.78
- FLCA Jun 26, 2026
- IZRL Dec 26, 2025
- FLCA Jul 6, 2026
- IZRL Dec 29, 2025
- FLCA Twice a year
- IZRL Annual
Distribution history
FLCA vs IZRL Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FLCA
- IZRL
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FLCA 13.1%, betterIZRL 20.8%
- Return per unit of risk
- FLCA 1.54, betterIZRL 0.80
- Worst fall
- FLCA −24.2%, betterIZRL −52.4%
- Market sensitivity
- FLCA 0.81IZRL 0.91
FLCA and IZRL in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.09% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

