EWC ranks 1st and IZRL 29th of 38 funds in the Developed Single Country Category.
EWC vs IZRL
IZRL −0.01pt a year
0.50%0.49%
EWC 187.5×the volume
1.68M8.98K
EWC +13.4pt
+11.4%−2.0%
EWC vs IZRL Performance
+71.2%−9.7%
- EWC 0.50%
- IZRL 0.49%, better
- EWC $7.58B
- IZRL $134M
- EWC +21.1%, better
- IZRL −4.5%
- EWC 1.24%
- IZRL 2.88%, better
- EWC 83
- IZRL 66
- EWC 1.68M sh, better
- IZRL 8.98K sh
- EWC $60.62
- IZRL $27.30
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EWC | IZRL |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B55 | B55 |
| Mission | A90Higher | C41 |
| Risk | A87Higher | F24 |
| Tradability | A97Higher | F21 |
| Holdings | A78Higher | A70 |
| Durability | A80Higher | D38 |
Rank among Developed Single Country funds
Same Category. EWC and IZRL are both graded against the same 38 Developed Single Country funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EWCA
IZRLC
In short
EWC A 1996 original: Canada's large and mid caps in one ticker, back when single-country funds were still a novelty. About 80 names, held through a capped MSCI index built so one giant can't swamp the basket.
IZRL ARK's odd one out. Instead of Cathie Wood's team picking stocks, IZRL follows a rules-based index of Israeli-incorporated innovators, equally weighted so the small names carry the same load as the household ones.
Stated mandate
EWC The fund seeks to track an index representing Canadian equities, providing exposure to large- and mid-sized companies in Canada.
IZRL IZRL seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the ARK Israeli Innovation Index. The index targets exchange-listed Israeli companies whose operations pursue disruptive innovation across genomics, health care, biotechnology, industrials, manufacturing, the Internet, and information technology.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EWC vs IZRL Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EWC vs IZRL Cost
Overpaying EWC vs IZRL
$187
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EWC 0.50%
$9,979
IZRL 0.49%
$9,792
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EWC | IZRL | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $900 | $883 | $17 |
| 20 | $3,460 | $3,394 | $66 |
| 30 | $9,979 | $9,792 | $187 |
- 0.50%EWC
- 0.49%IZRL, cheaper
- Middle half of Developed Single Country funds
- Median 0.50%
IZRL 10th cheapest of 38 funds
EWC 14th cheapest of 38 funds
EWC vs IZRL Dividends
- EWC 1.24%
- IZRL 2.88%, better
- EWC $0.75
- IZRL $0.78
- EWC $0.28
- IZRL $0.78
- EWC Jun 15, 2026
- IZRL Dec 26, 2025
- EWC Jun 18, 2026
- IZRL Dec 29, 2025
- EWC Twice a year
- IZRL Annual
Distribution history
EWC vs IZRL Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- EWC
- IZRL
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EWC 13.1%, betterIZRL 20.8%
- Return per unit of risk
- EWC 1.54, betterIZRL 0.80
- Worst fall
- EWC −24.8%, betterIZRL −52.4%
- Market sensitivity
- EWC 0.88IZRL 0.91
EWC and IZRL in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.50% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





