FLGB ranks 3rd and IZRL 29th of 38 funds in the Developed Single Country Category.
FLGB vs IZRL
FLGB −0.40pt a year
0.09%0.49%
FLGB 11.8×the volume
106K8.98K
FLGB +13.7pt
+11.7%−2.0%
FLGB vs IZRL Performance
+74.3%−9.7%
- FLGB 0.09%, better
- IZRL 0.49%
- FLGB $878M
- IZRL $134M
- FLGB +15.9%, better
- IZRL −4.5%
- FLGB 2.87%
- IZRL 2.88%, better
- FLGB 89
- IZRL 66
- FLGB 106K sh, better
- IZRL 8.98K sh
- FLGB $36.82
- IZRL $27.30
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FLGB | IZRL |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A93Higher | B55 |
| Mission | A73Higher | C41 |
| Risk | A73Higher | F24 |
| Tradability | B62Higher | F21 |
| Holdings | A72Higher | A70 |
| Durability | C53Higher | D38 |
Rank among Developed Single Country funds
Same Category. FLGB and IZRL are both graded against the same 38 Developed Single Country funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FLGBA
IZRLC
In short
FLGB Britain in one ticker for nine basis points. Franklin's UK tracker follows a capped FTSE index of roughly 110 British companies and charges a small fraction of what the typical index fund in its peer group costs.
IZRL ARK's odd one out. Instead of Cathie Wood's team picking stocks, IZRL follows a rules-based index of Israeli-incorporated innovators, equally weighted so the small names carry the same load as the household ones.
Stated mandate
FLGB The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the performance of the FTSE UK RIC Capped Index.
IZRL IZRL seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the ARK Israeli Innovation Index. The index targets exchange-listed Israeli companies whose operations pursue disruptive innovation across genomics, health care, biotechnology, industrials, manufacturing, the Internet, and information technology.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FLGB vs IZRL Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FLGB vs IZRL Cost
Overpaying IZRL vs FLGB
$7,894
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FLGB 0.09%
$1,898
IZRL 0.49%
$9,792
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FLGB | IZRL | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $165 | $883 | $718 |
| 20 | $646 | $3,394 | $2,748 |
| 30 | $1,898 | $9,792 | $7,894 |
- 0.09%FLGB, cheaper
- 0.49%IZRL
- Middle half of Developed Single Country funds
- Median 0.50%
FLGB cheapest of 38 funds
IZRL 10th cheapest of 38 funds
FLGB vs IZRL Dividends
- FLGB 2.87%
- IZRL 2.88%, better
- FLGB $1.06
- IZRL $0.78
- FLGB $0.47
- IZRL $0.78
- FLGB Jun 26, 2026
- IZRL Dec 26, 2025
- FLGB Jul 6, 2026
- IZRL Dec 29, 2025
- FLGB Twice a year
- IZRL Annual
Distribution history
FLGB vs IZRL Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FLGB
- IZRL
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FLGB 11.0%, betterIZRL 20.8%
- Return per unit of risk
- FLGB 1.44, betterIZRL 0.80
- Worst fall
- FLGB −25.9%, betterIZRL −52.4%
- Market sensitivity
- FLGB 0.75IZRL 0.91
FLGB and IZRL in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.09% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.


