Skip to content

FLCH vs KWEB

Franklin FTSE China ETF

FLCHANYSE Arca

KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF

KWEBCNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

FLCH −0.50pt a year

FLCH0.19%KWEB0.69%

Avg volume · 30D

KWEB 165.4×the volume

FLCH108KKWEB17.9M

5Y return · a year

FLCH +6.5pt

FLCH−4.1%KWEB−10.6%

FLCH vs KWEB Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

−18.7%FLCH−42.9%KWEB

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. FLCH −18.7%. KWEB −42.9%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−50%−30%−10%0%10%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
FLCH 0.19%, better
KWEB 0.69%
Fund size
FLCH $252M
KWEB $4.22B
1Y total return
FLCH −20.9%, better
KWEB −39.6%
Yield (12M)
FLCH 2.63%
KWEB 9.22%, better
Holdings
FLCH 1112
KWEB 46
Avg volume (30D)
FLCH 108K sh
KWEB 17.9M sh, better
NAV per share
FLCH $19.38
KWEB $22.70
52W range

ETF.net Grade

FLCH: Cost 100, Risk 64, Mission 87, Tradability 62, Holdings 65, Durability 70. KWEB: Cost 38, Risk 16, Mission not scored, Tradability 77, Holdings 35, Durability 79.
Pillar letters and Scores for FLCH, KWEB, with each pillar’s weight
PillarFLCHKWEB
Cost30% weightA100HigherD38
Mission25% weightA87Not scored
Risk15% weightB64HigherF16
Tradability15% weightB62A77Higher
Holdings10% weightB65HigherD35
Durability5% weightA70A79Higher

Rank among China funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. FLCH and KWEB are both graded against the same 28 China funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

China⁠

Category · 28 funds
See all 28 ›

FLCH ranks 2nd and KWEB 21st of 28 funds in the China Category.

  1. Rank 1ACXSEWisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises FundScore 81
  2. Rank 2AFLCHFranklin FTSE China ETFScore 80
  3. Rank 3AMCHIiShares MSCI China ETFScore 77
  4. Rank 20CNBCENeuberger Berman China Equity ETFScore 44
  5. Rank 21CKWEBKraneShares CSI China Internet ETFScore 43
  6. Rank 22CCCPXCorgi China 2x Daily ETFScore 40

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

FLCHAFranklin FTSE China ETF

KWEBCKraneShares CSI China Internet ETF

In short

FLCH Cheap and wide, in the best way. FLCH holds roughly a thousand Chinese stocks and charges 0.19% a year, a fraction of what most single-country China funds ask. Whole market, small toll.

KWEB China's internet giants, undiluted: roughly 30 offshore-listed names instead of a whole-market basket. Live since 2013, KWEB is the ticker traders reach for when they want to express a view on China tech.

Stated mandate

FLCH The Fund seeks investment results that closely correspond, before fees and expenses, to the performance of the FTSE China RIC Capped Index.

KWEB The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the performance of the CSI Overseas China Internet Index, which covers publicly traded China-based companies focused primarily on internet and internet-related businesses.

Why people hold it

  • FLCH 0.19% a year, against a roughly 0.70% median for China funds. It also undercuts the category stalwarts MCHI and GXC, both at 0.59%.
  • About 1,000 holdings, so you own the long tail of Chinese listings rather than a short list of mega-cap headline names.
  • One job, done tightly: mirror the FTSE China RIC Capped Index before fees. On tracking it ranks among the strongest builds in its China peer group.sec.gov
  • KWEB Tracks the CSI Overseas China Internet Index: about 30 China-based internet companies listed in Hong Kong, on NASDAQ or the NYSE. A sector bet, not a country bet.kraneshares.com
  • Among the most actively traded funds in the China group, with an options market deep enough that KraneShares runs a covered-call fund written on KWEB itself.kraneshares.com
  • At 0.69% a year, the fee sits right at the median for its China peer group despite the narrow single-theme mandate.
  • Trading since 2013 and now a multi-billion-dollar fund: a long operating history for a single-country thematic product.

Worth knowing

  • FLCH It is China or nothing. Policy shifts, regulatory news and the currency drive the ride, with no other market in the basket to cushion it.
  • Mid-sized and only moderately traded next to the category's giants, so bid-ask spreads can bite more on larger orders.
  • Cash comes once or twice a year, not monthly. This is an equity index vehicle, not an income schedule.
  • KWEB About 30 stocks, one sector, one country. That concentration cuts both ways, and price swings run large next to broad China funds.
  • The index covers offshore listings only (Hong Kong, NASDAQ, NYSE), so mainland-listed A-share internet names sit outside the portfolio.kraneshares.com
  • Whole-market China exposure is cheaper: FLCH charges 0.19% and MCHI 0.59%, both spanning the full market rather than one theme.

Full FLCH profile⁠

Full KWEB profile⁠

FLCH vs KWEB Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

FLCH vs KWEB Cost

Overpaying KWEB vs FLCH

$9,477

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • FLCH 0.19%

    $3,952

  • KWEB 0.69%

    $13,429

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • FLCH 0.19%
  • KWEB 0.69%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530KWEB $13,429FLCH $3,952

Year by year

YearFLCHKWEBOverpaying
10$347$1,232$885
20$1,351$4,697$3,346
30$3,952$13,429$9,477

Expense ratio

  • 0.19%FLCH, cheaper
  • 0.69%KWEB
  • Middle half of China funds
  • Median 0.65%

FLCH cheapest of 28 funds

KWEB 17th cheapest of 28 funds

FLCH vs KWEB Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
FLCH 2.63%
KWEB 9.22%, better
Payout (12M)
FLCH $0.51
KWEB $2.10
Last payment
FLCH $0.14
KWEB $2.10
Ex-dividend
FLCH Jun 26, 2026
KWEB Dec 22, 2025
Paid on
FLCH Jul 6, 2026
KWEB Dec 23, 2025
Frequency
FLCH Twice a year
KWEB Annual

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

FLCHTwice a year · 18 paymentsAll FLCH payments⁠
One bar per payment. 18 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 20, 2017 $0.00084; Jun 20, 2018 $0.10; Dec 20, 2018 $0.29; Jun 11, 2019 $0.03; Dec 11, 2019 $0.46; Jun 11, 2020 $0.04; Dec 14, 2020 $0.25; Jun 10, 2021 $0.03; Dec 13, 2021 $0.34; Jun 17, 2022 $0.14; Dec 16, 2022 $0.36; Jun 16, 2023 $0.19; Dec 15, 2023 $0.37; Jun 21, 2024 $0.12; Dec 20, 2024 $0.41; Jun 20, 2025 $0.19; Dec 19, 2025 $0.37; Jun 26, 2026 $0.14. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.502017202020232026YTD
KWEBAnnual · 9 paymentsAll KWEB payments⁠
One bar per payment. 9 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 19, 2017 $0.34; Dec 26, 2018 $1.27; Dec 27, 2019 $0.04; Dec 29, 2020 $0.22; Dec 29, 2021 $2.58; Dec 18, 2023 $0.42; Dec 27, 2023 $0.04; Dec 17, 2024 $1.02; Dec 22, 2025 $2.10. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.502017202020232026YTD

FLCH vs KWEB Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • FLCH
  • KWEB
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: KWEB −61.9% · Oct 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−60%−40%−20%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
FLCH 21.1%, betterKWEB 31.1%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
FLCH 0.29, betterKWEB −0.03
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
FLCH −48.1%, betterKWEB −61.9%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
FLCH 0.55KWEB 0.88

FLCH and KWEB in the news

Popular comparisons

  • FLCHAvsCXSEA

    Franklin FTSE China ETF · WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.19% · 0.32%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • KWEBCvsCXSEA

    KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF · WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.32%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FLCHAvsMCHIA

    Franklin FTSE China ETF · iShares MSCI China ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.19% · 0.59%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • KWEBCvsMCHIA

    KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF · iShares MSCI China ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.59%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FLCHAvsGXCA

    Franklin FTSE China ETF · State Street SPDR S&P China ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.19% · 0.59%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • KWEBCvsGXCA

    KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF · State Street SPDR S&P China ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.59%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.