CXSE ranks 1st and KWEB 21st of 28 funds in the China Category.
CXSE vs KWEB
CXSE −0.37pt a year
0.32%0.69%
KWEB 481.8×the volume
37.2K17.9M
CXSE +6.3pt
+3.1%−3.2%
CXSE vs KWEB Performance
−39.0%−42.9%
- CXSE 0.32%, better
- KWEB 0.69%
- CXSE $372M
- KWEB $4.22B
- CXSE −24.9%, better
- KWEB −39.6%
- CXSE 2.22%
- KWEB 9.22%, better
- CXSE 241
- KWEB 46
- CXSE 37.2K sh
- KWEB 17.9M sh, better
- CXSE $31.37
- KWEB $22.70
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CXSE | KWEB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A97Higher | D38 |
| Mission | A100 | |
| Risk | C47Higher | F16 |
| Tradability | B63 | A77Higher |
| Holdings | A74Higher | D35 |
| Durability | A79 | A79 |
Rank among China funds
Same Category. CXSE and KWEB are both graded against the same 28 China funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CXSEA
KWEBC
In short
CXSE CXSE tracks an index that screens state-owned enterprises out of China, leaving the privately run companies. A tilt toward entrepreneurs rather than Beijing's balance sheet, at a fee well under the typical China fund.
KWEB China's internet giants, undiluted: roughly 30 offshore-listed names instead of a whole-market basket. Live since 2013, KWEB is the ticker traders reach for when they want to express a view on China tech.
Stated mandate
CXSE The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Index.
KWEB The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the performance of the CSI Overseas China Internet Index, which covers publicly traded China-based companies focused primarily on internet and internet-related businesses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CXSE vs KWEB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CXSE vs KWEB Cost
Overpaying KWEB vs CXSE
$6,887
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CXSE 0.32%
$6,542
KWEB 0.69%
$13,429
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CXSE | KWEB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $580 | $1,232 | $652 |
| 20 | $2,250 | $4,697 | $2,447 |
| 30 | $6,542 | $13,429 | $6,887 |
- 0.32%CXSE, cheaper
- 0.69%KWEB
- Middle half of China funds
- Median 0.65%
CXSE 2nd cheapest of 28 funds
KWEB 17th cheapest of 28 funds
CXSE vs KWEB Dividends
- CXSE 2.22%
- KWEB 9.22%, better
- CXSE $0.69
- KWEB $2.10
- CXSE $0.26
- KWEB $2.10
- CXSE Sep 25, 2026
- KWEB Dec 22, 2025
- CXSE Sep 29, 2026
- KWEB Dec 23, 2025
- CXSE Quarterly
- KWEB Annual
Distribution history
CXSE vs KWEB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- CXSE
- KWEB
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CXSE 24.9%, betterKWEB 31.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- CXSE 0.12, betterKWEB −0.03
- Worst fall
- CXSE −57.6%, betterKWEB −61.9%
- Market sensitivity
- CXSE 0.75KWEB 0.88
Popular comparisons
- 0.32% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.32% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.32% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





