FLCH ranks 2nd and MCH 15th of 28 funds in the China Category.
FLCH vs MCH
FLCH −0.60pt a year
0.19%0.79%
FLCH 50.2×the volume
108K2.16K
MCH +0.7pt
+8.8%+9.5%
FLCH vs MCH Performance
−20.9%−17.6%
- FLCH 0.19%, better
- MCH 0.79%
- FLCH $252M
- MCH $15M
- FLCH −20.9%
- MCH −17.6%, better
- FLCH 2.63%, better
- MCH 2.07%
- FLCH 1112
- MCH 57
- FLCH 108K sh, better
- MCH 2.16K sh
- FLCH $19.38
- MCH $23.95
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FLCH | MCH |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A100Higher | F21 |
| Mission | A87 | A98Higher |
| Risk | B64 | B68Higher |
| Tradability | B62Higher | F12 |
| Holdings | B65Higher | C49 |
| Durability | A70Higher | D25 |
Rank among China funds
Same Category. FLCH and MCH are both graded against the same 28 China funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FLCHA
MCHC
In short
FLCH Cheap and wide, in the best way. FLCH holds roughly a thousand Chinese stocks and charges 0.19% a year, a fraction of what most single-country China funds ask. Whole market, small toll.
MCH A stock-picker's China fund from an Asia-focused boutique: roughly 60 Chinese common and preferred shares chosen name by name rather than copied from an index. Launched in 2022.
Stated mandate
FLCH The Fund seeks investment results that closely correspond, before fees and expenses, to the performance of the FTSE China RIC Capped Index.
MCH The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation while investing at least 80% of net assets in common and preferred stocks of companies located in China, including Hong Kong and Macau.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FLCH vs MCH Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FLCH vs MCH Cost
Overpaying MCH vs FLCH
$11,222
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FLCH 0.19%
$3,952
MCH 0.79%
$15,174
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FLCH | MCH | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $347 | $1,405 | $1,058 |
| 20 | $1,351 | $5,331 | $3,980 |
| 30 | $3,952 | $15,174 | $11,222 |
- 0.19%FLCH, cheaper
- 0.79%MCH
- Middle half of China funds
- Median 0.65%
FLCH cheapest of 28 funds
MCH 22nd cheapest of 28 funds
FLCH vs MCH Dividends
- FLCH 2.63%, better
- MCH 2.07%
- FLCH $0.51
- MCH $0.50
- FLCH $0.14
- MCH $0.50
- FLCH Jun 26, 2026
- MCH Dec 17, 2025
- FLCH Jul 6, 2026
- MCH Dec 22, 2025
- FLCH Twice a year
- MCH Annual
Distribution history
FLCH vs MCH Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FLCH 21.1%, betterMCH 25.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- FLCH 0.29MCH 0.30, better
- Worst fall
- FLCH −48.1%MCH −40.6%
- Market sensitivity
- FLCH 0.55MCH 0.86
Popular comparisons
- 0.19% · 0.32%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.32%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.