GXC ranks 4th and MCH 15th of 28 funds in the China Category.
GXC vs MCH
GXC −0.20pt a year
0.59%0.79%
GXC 10.8×the volume
23.4K2.16K
MCH +1.1pt
+8.4%+9.5%
GXC vs MCH Performance
−19.1%−17.6%
- GXC 0.59%, better
- MCH 0.79%
- GXC $421M
- MCH $15M
- GXC −19.1%
- MCH −17.6%, better
- GXC 2.46%, better
- MCH 2.07%
- GXC 1539
- MCH 57
- GXC 23.4K sh, better
- MCH 2.16K sh
- GXC $80.17
- MCH $23.95
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GXC | MCH |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A78Higher | F21 |
| Mission | A85 | A98Higher |
| Risk | B67 | B68Higher |
| Tradability | B69Higher | F12 |
| Holdings | A76Higher | C49 |
| Durability | A84Higher | D25 |
Rank among China funds
Same Category. GXC and MCH are both graded against the same 28 China funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GXCA
MCHC
In short
GXC The whole China market in one ticker: roughly 1,400 stocks from megacaps down to small caps, tracked since 2007. Most China funds buy the famous names. GXC buys the phone book.
MCH A stock-picker's China fund from an Asia-focused boutique: roughly 60 Chinese common and preferred shares chosen name by name rather than copied from an index. Launched in 2022.
Stated mandate
GXC The fund seeks to provide returns that generally correspond to the total return performance of the S&P China BMI Index.
MCH The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation while investing at least 80% of net assets in common and preferred stocks of companies located in China, including Hong Kong and Macau.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GXC vs MCH Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GXC vs MCH Cost
Overpaying MCH vs GXC
$3,539
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GXC 0.59%
$11,635
MCH 0.79%
$15,174
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GXC | MCH | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,058 | $1,405 | $347 |
| 20 | $4,051 | $5,331 | $1,280 |
| 30 | $11,635 | $15,174 | $3,539 |
- 0.59%GXC, cheaper
- 0.79%MCH
- Middle half of China funds
- Median 0.65%
GXC 5th cheapest of 28 funds
MCH 22nd cheapest of 28 funds
GXC vs MCH Dividends
- GXC 2.46%, better
- MCH 2.07%
- GXC $1.99
- MCH $0.50
- GXC $0.67
- MCH $0.50
- GXC Jun 22, 2026
- MCH Dec 17, 2025
- GXC Jun 26, 2026
- MCH Dec 22, 2025
- GXC Twice a year
- MCH Annual
Distribution history
GXC vs MCH Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GXC 20.7%, betterMCH 25.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- GXC 0.27MCH 0.30, better
- Worst fall
- GXC −46.5%MCH −40.6%
- Market sensitivity
- GXC 0.69MCH 0.86
Popular comparisons
- 0.59% · 0.32%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.32%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.