FLCH ranks 2nd and MCHS 23rd of 28 funds in the China Category.
FLCH vs MCHS
FLCH −0.70pt a year
0.19%0.89%
FLCH 13.2×the volume
108K8.23K
FLCH vs MCHS Performance
−20.9%+2.4%
- FLCH 0.19%, better
- MCHS 0.89%
- FLCH $252M
- MCHS $13M
- FLCH −20.9%
- MCHS +2.4%, better
- FLCH 2.63%
- MCHS 3.47%, better
- FLCH 1112
- MCHS 45
- FLCH 108K sh, better
- MCHS 8.23K sh
- FLCH $19.38
- MCHS $34.29
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FLCH | MCHS |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A100Higher | F10 |
| Mission | A87Higher | B62 |
| Risk | B64Higher | C50 |
| Tradability | B62Higher | C49 |
| Holdings | B65Higher | C47 |
| Durability | A70Higher | F21 |
Rank among China funds
Same Category. FLCH and MCHS are both graded against the same 28 China funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FLCHA
MCHSD
In short
FLCH Cheap and wide, in the best way. FLCH holds roughly a thousand Chinese stocks and charges 0.19% a year, a fraction of what most single-country China funds ask. Whole market, small toll.
MCHS An active China stock picker in a category ruled by index trackers, run by a firm that has focused on Asia since 1991. The trade-offs: a fee at the high end of its peer group and a small, lightly traded footprint.
Stated mandate
FLCH The Fund seeks investment results that closely correspond, before fees and expenses, to the performance of the FTSE China RIC Capped Index.
MCHS The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FLCH vs MCHS Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FLCH vs MCHS Cost
Overpaying MCHS vs FLCH
$12,920
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FLCH 0.19%
$3,952
MCHS 0.89%
$16,872
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FLCH | MCHS | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $347 | $1,576 | $1,229 |
| 20 | $1,351 | $5,953 | $4,602 |
| 30 | $3,952 | $16,872 | $12,920 |
- 0.19%FLCH, cheaper
- 0.89%MCHS
- Middle half of China funds
- Median 0.65%
FLCH cheapest of 28 funds
MCHS 24th cheapest of 28 funds
FLCH vs MCHS Dividends
- FLCH 2.63%
- MCHS 3.47%, better
- FLCH $0.51
- MCHS $1.16
- FLCH $0.14
- MCHS $1.16
- FLCH Jun 26, 2026
- MCHS Dec 17, 2025
- FLCH Jul 6, 2026
- MCHS Dec 22, 2025
- FLCH Twice a year
- MCHS Irregular
Distribution history
FLCH vs MCHS Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FLCH 21.1%MCHS 31.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- FLCH 0.29MCHS 0.56
- Worst fall
- FLCH −48.1%MCHS −36.6%
- Market sensitivity
- FLCH 0.55MCHS 0.96
Popular comparisons
- 0.19% · 0.32%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.32%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.