Skip to content

FLCH vs MCHS

Franklin FTSE China ETF

FLCHANYSE Arca

Matthews China Discovery Active ETF MCHS

MCHSDNasdaq

Overlap

Expense ratio

FLCH −0.70pt a year

FLCH0.19%MCHS0.89%

Avg volume · 30D

FLCH 13.2×the volume

FLCH108KMCHS8.23K

FLCH vs MCHS Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

−20.9%FLCH+2.4%MCHS

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. FLCH −20.9%. MCHS +2.4%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.20%40%60%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
FLCH 0.19%, better
MCHS 0.89%
Fund size
FLCH $252M
MCHS $13M
1Y total return
FLCH −20.9%
MCHS +2.4%, better
Yield (12M)
FLCH 2.63%
MCHS 3.47%, better
Holdings
FLCH 1112
MCHS 45
Avg volume (30D)
FLCH 108K sh, better
MCHS 8.23K sh
NAV per share
FLCH $19.38
MCHS $34.29
52W range

ETF.net Grade

FLCH: Cost 100, Risk 64, Mission 87, Tradability 62, Holdings 65, Durability 70. MCHS: Cost 10, Risk 50, Mission 62, Tradability 49, Holdings 47, Durability 21.
Pillar letters and Scores for FLCH, MCHS, with each pillar’s weight
PillarFLCHMCHS
Cost30% weightA100HigherF10
Mission25% weightA87HigherB62
Risk15% weightB64HigherC50
Tradability15% weightB62HigherC49
Holdings10% weightB65HigherC47
Durability5% weightA70HigherF21

Rank among China funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. FLCH and MCHS are both graded against the same 28 China funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

China⁠

Category · 28 funds
See all 28 ›

FLCH ranks 2nd and MCHS 23rd of 28 funds in the China Category.

  1. Rank 1ACXSEWisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises FundScore 81
  2. Rank 2AFLCHFranklin FTSE China ETFScore 80
  3. Rank 3AMCHIiShares MSCI China ETFScore 77
  4. Rank 22CCCPXCorgi China 2x Daily ETFScore 40
  5. Rank 23DMCHSMatthews China Discovery Active ETF MCHSScore 39
  6. Rank 24DCASSimplify China A Shares PLUS Income ETFScore 35

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

FLCHAFranklin FTSE China ETF

MCHSDMatthews China Discovery Active ETF MCHS

In short

FLCH Cheap and wide, in the best way. FLCH holds roughly a thousand Chinese stocks and charges 0.19% a year, a fraction of what most single-country China funds ask. Whole market, small toll.

MCHS An active China stock picker in a category ruled by index trackers, run by a firm that has focused on Asia since 1991. The trade-offs: a fee at the high end of its peer group and a small, lightly traded footprint.

Stated mandate

FLCH The Fund seeks investment results that closely correspond, before fees and expenses, to the performance of the FTSE China RIC Capped Index.

MCHS The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation.

Why people hold it

  • FLCH 0.19% a year, against a roughly 0.70% median for China funds. It also undercuts the category stalwarts MCHI and GXC, both at 0.59%.
  • About 1,000 holdings, so you own the long tail of Chinese listings rather than a short list of mega-cap headline names.
  • One job, done tightly: mirror the FTSE China RIC Capped Index before fees. On tracking it ranks among the strongest builds in its China peer group.sec.gov
  • MCHS Most China ETFs just track an index. This one is actively managed, so a person decides what goes in and what stays out.
  • Matthews has focused on Asia since 1991, which makes this a specialist shop's China portfolio rather than a generalist's side bet.matthewsasia.com
  • The mandate is plain: Chinese stocks, held for long-term capital appreciation. No index weights dictating how much of the portfolio goes to the biggest names.

Worth knowing

  • FLCH It is China or nothing. Policy shifts, regulatory news and the currency drive the ride, with no other market in the basket to cushion it.
  • Mid-sized and only moderately traded next to the category's giants, so bid-ask spreads can bite more on larger orders.
  • Cash comes once or twice a year, not monthly. This is an equity index vehicle, not an income schedule.
  • MCHS Cost is the trade-off. 0.89% net of a waiver through April 30, 2027 (0.99% gross), versus 0.19% for FLCH and 0.32% for CXSE, and above the category median fee.
  • Small asset base and light trading, so spreads tend to run wider than on the category's household names, and the fund has less scale behind it than long-established rivals.
  • Single-country China means one government, one currency and one policy cycle driving results, with no cushion from other markets.

Full FLCH profile⁠

Full MCHS profile⁠

FLCH vs MCHS Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

FLCH vs MCHS Cost

Overpaying MCHS vs FLCH

$12,920

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • FLCH 0.19%

    $3,952

  • MCHS 0.89%

    $16,872

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • FLCH 0.19%
  • MCHS 0.89%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530MCHS $16,872FLCH $3,952

Year by year

YearFLCHMCHSOverpaying
10$347$1,576$1,229
20$1,351$5,953$4,602
30$3,952$16,872$12,920

Expense ratio

  • 0.19%FLCH, cheaper
  • 0.89%MCHS
  • Middle half of China funds
  • Median 0.65%

FLCH cheapest of 28 funds

MCHS 24th cheapest of 28 funds

FLCH vs MCHS Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
FLCH 2.63%
MCHS 3.47%, better
Payout (12M)
FLCH $0.51
MCHS $1.16
Last payment
FLCH $0.14
MCHS $1.16
Ex-dividend
FLCH Jun 26, 2026
MCHS Dec 17, 2025
Paid on
FLCH Jul 6, 2026
MCHS Dec 22, 2025
Frequency
FLCH Twice a year
MCHS Irregular

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

FLCHTwice a year · 18 paymentsAll FLCH payments⁠
One bar per payment. 18 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 20, 2017 $0.00084; Jun 20, 2018 $0.10; Dec 20, 2018 $0.29; Jun 11, 2019 $0.03; Dec 11, 2019 $0.46; Jun 11, 2020 $0.04; Dec 14, 2020 $0.25; Jun 10, 2021 $0.03; Dec 13, 2021 $0.34; Jun 17, 2022 $0.14; Dec 16, 2022 $0.36; Jun 16, 2023 $0.19; Dec 15, 2023 $0.37; Jun 21, 2024 $0.12; Dec 20, 2024 $0.41; Jun 20, 2025 $0.19; Dec 19, 2025 $0.37; Jun 26, 2026 $0.14. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12017202020232026YTD
MCHSIrregular · 2 paymentsAll MCHS payments⁠
One bar per payment. 2 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 18, 2024 $1.41; Dec 17, 2025 $1.16. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12017202020232026YTD

FLCH vs MCHS Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
FLCH 21.1%MCHS 31.0%since Feb 2024
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
FLCH 0.29MCHS 0.56since Feb 2024
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
FLCH −48.1%MCHS −36.6%since Jan 2024
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
FLCH 0.55MCHS 0.96

Popular comparisons

  • FLCHAvsCXSEA

    Franklin FTSE China ETF · WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.19% · 0.32%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • MCHSDvsCXSEA

    Matthews China Discovery Active ETF MCHS · WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.89% · 0.32%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FLCHAvsMCHIA

    Franklin FTSE China ETF · iShares MSCI China ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.19% · 0.59%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • MCHSDvsMCHIA

    Matthews China Discovery Active ETF MCHS · iShares MSCI China ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.89% · 0.59%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FLCHAvsGXCA

    Franklin FTSE China ETF · State Street SPDR S&P China ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.19% · 0.59%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • MCHSDvsGXCA

    Matthews China Discovery Active ETF MCHS · State Street SPDR S&P China ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.89% · 0.59%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.