CXSE ranks 1st and MCHS 23rd of 28 funds in the China Category.
CXSE vs MCHS
CXSE −0.57pt a year
0.32%0.89%
CXSE 4.5×the volume
37.2K8.23K
CXSE vs MCHS Performance
−24.9%+2.4%
- CXSE 0.32%, better
- MCHS 0.89%
- CXSE $372M
- MCHS $13M
- CXSE −24.9%
- MCHS +2.4%, better
- CXSE 2.22%
- MCHS 3.47%, better
- CXSE 241
- MCHS 45
- CXSE 37.2K sh, better
- MCHS 8.23K sh
- CXSE $31.37
- MCHS $34.29
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CXSE | MCHS |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A97Higher | F10 |
| Mission | A100Higher | B62 |
| Risk | C47 | C50Higher |
| Tradability | B63Higher | C49 |
| Holdings | A74Higher | C47 |
| Durability | A79Higher | F21 |
Rank among China funds
Same Category. CXSE and MCHS are both graded against the same 28 China funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CXSEA
MCHSD
In short
CXSE CXSE tracks an index that screens state-owned enterprises out of China, leaving the privately run companies. A tilt toward entrepreneurs rather than Beijing's balance sheet, at a fee well under the typical China fund.
MCHS An active China stock picker in a category ruled by index trackers, run by a firm that has focused on Asia since 1991. The trade-offs: a fee at the high end of its peer group and a small, lightly traded footprint.
Stated mandate
CXSE The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Index.
MCHS The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CXSE vs MCHS Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CXSE vs MCHS Cost
Overpaying MCHS vs CXSE
$10,330
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CXSE 0.32%
$6,542
MCHS 0.89%
$16,872
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CXSE | MCHS | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $580 | $1,576 | $996 |
| 20 | $2,250 | $5,953 | $3,703 |
| 30 | $6,542 | $16,872 | $10,330 |
- 0.32%CXSE, cheaper
- 0.89%MCHS
- Middle half of China funds
- Median 0.65%
CXSE 2nd cheapest of 28 funds
MCHS 24th cheapest of 28 funds
CXSE vs MCHS Dividends
- CXSE 2.22%
- MCHS 3.47%, better
- CXSE $0.69
- MCHS $1.16
- CXSE $0.26
- MCHS $1.16
- CXSE Sep 25, 2026
- MCHS Dec 17, 2025
- CXSE Sep 29, 2026
- MCHS Dec 22, 2025
- CXSE Quarterly
- MCHS Irregular
Distribution history
CXSE vs MCHS Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CXSE 24.9%MCHS 31.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- CXSE 0.12MCHS 0.56
- Worst fall
- CXSE −57.6%MCHS −36.6%
- Market sensitivity
- CXSE 0.75MCHS 0.96
Popular comparisons
- 0.32% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.32% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.32% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.