Skip to content

CXSE vs MCHS

WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund

CXSEANasdaq

Matthews China Discovery Active ETF MCHS

MCHSDNasdaq

Overlap

Expense ratio

CXSE −0.57pt a year

CXSE0.32%MCHS0.89%

Avg volume · 30D

CXSE 4.5×the volume

CXSE37.2KMCHS8.23K

CXSE vs MCHS Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

−24.9%CXSE+2.4%MCHS

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. CXSE −24.9%. MCHS +2.4%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.20%40%60%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
CXSE 0.32%, better
MCHS 0.89%
Fund size
CXSE $372M
MCHS $13M
1Y total return
CXSE −24.9%
MCHS +2.4%, better
Yield (12M)
CXSE 2.22%
MCHS 3.47%, better
Holdings
CXSE 241
MCHS 45
Avg volume (30D)
CXSE 37.2K sh, better
MCHS 8.23K sh
NAV per share
CXSE $31.37
MCHS $34.29
52W range

ETF.net Grade

CXSE: Cost 97, Risk 47, Mission 100, Tradability 63, Holdings 74, Durability 79. MCHS: Cost 10, Risk 50, Mission 62, Tradability 49, Holdings 47, Durability 21.
Pillar letters and Scores for CXSE, MCHS, with each pillar’s weight
PillarCXSEMCHS
Cost30% weightA97HigherF10
Mission25% weightA100HigherB62
Risk15% weightC47C50Higher
Tradability15% weightB63HigherC49
Holdings10% weightA74HigherC47
Durability5% weightA79HigherF21

Rank among China funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. CXSE and MCHS are both graded against the same 28 China funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

China⁠

Category · 28 funds
See all 28 ›

CXSE ranks 1st and MCHS 23rd of 28 funds in the China Category.

  1. Rank 1ACXSEWisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises FundScore 81
  2. Rank 2AFLCHFranklin FTSE China ETFScore 80
  3. Rank 22CCCPXCorgi China 2x Daily ETFScore 40
  4. Rank 23DMCHSMatthews China Discovery Active ETF MCHSScore 39
  5. Rank 24DCASSimplify China A Shares PLUS Income ETFScore 35

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

CXSEAWisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund

MCHSDMatthews China Discovery Active ETF MCHS

In short

CXSE CXSE tracks an index that screens state-owned enterprises out of China, leaving the privately run companies. A tilt toward entrepreneurs rather than Beijing's balance sheet, at a fee well under the typical China fund.

MCHS An active China stock picker in a category ruled by index trackers, run by a firm that has focused on Asia since 1991. The trade-offs: a fee at the high end of its peer group and a small, lightly traded footprint.

Stated mandate

CXSE The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Index.

MCHS The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation.

Why people hold it

  • CXSE The whole design is one screen: state-controlled companies out, privately run ones in, about 200 of them. Not a broad China index with a tweak.
  • 0.32% a year, well under half the 0.70% median for single-country China funds.
  • Trading since 2012, and one of the tighter, more faithful builds in a crowded China cohort.
  • MCHS Most China ETFs just track an index. This one is actively managed, so a person decides what goes in and what stays out.
  • Matthews has focused on Asia since 1991, which makes this a specialist shop's China portfolio rather than a generalist's side bet.matthewsasia.com
  • The mandate is plain: Chinese stocks, held for long-term capital appreciation. No index weights dictating how much of the portfolio goes to the biggest names.

Worth knowing

  • CXSE Thinly traded next to China heavyweights like MCHI and GXC, so limit orders matter more here.
  • One country, about 200 stocks, and none of the state-backed heavyweights as ballast. Swings run bigger than a diversified global fund's.
  • Cheap for the group, not the cheapest: FLCH (0.19%) and JCHI (0.15%) undercut it with different mandates.
  • MCHS Cost is the trade-off. 0.89% net of a waiver through April 30, 2027 (0.99% gross), versus 0.19% for FLCH and 0.32% for CXSE, and above the category median fee.
  • Small asset base and light trading, so spreads tend to run wider than on the category's household names, and the fund has less scale behind it than long-established rivals.
  • Single-country China means one government, one currency and one policy cycle driving results, with no cushion from other markets.

Full CXSE profile⁠

Full MCHS profile⁠

CXSE vs MCHS Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

CXSE vs MCHS Cost

Overpaying MCHS vs CXSE

$10,330

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • CXSE 0.32%

    $6,542

  • MCHS 0.89%

    $16,872

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • CXSE 0.32%
  • MCHS 0.89%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530MCHS $16,872CXSE $6,542

Year by year

YearCXSEMCHSOverpaying
10$580$1,576$996
20$2,250$5,953$3,703
30$6,542$16,872$10,330

Expense ratio

  • 0.32%CXSE, cheaper
  • 0.89%MCHS
  • Middle half of China funds
  • Median 0.65%

CXSE 2nd cheapest of 28 funds

MCHS 24th cheapest of 28 funds

CXSE vs MCHS Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
CXSE 2.22%
MCHS 3.47%, better
Payout (12M)
CXSE $0.69
MCHS $1.16
Last payment
CXSE $0.26
MCHS $1.16
Ex-dividend
CXSE Sep 25, 2026
MCHS Dec 17, 2025
Paid on
CXSE Sep 29, 2026
MCHS Dec 22, 2025
Frequency
CXSE Quarterly
MCHS Irregular

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

CXSEQuarterly · 31 paymentsAll CXSE payments⁠
One bar per payment. 31 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Jun 26, 2017 $0.23; Sep 26, 2017 $0.07; Dec 26, 2017 $0.0095; Jun 25, 2018 $0.26; Sep 25, 2018 $0.14; Dec 24, 2018 $0.05; Jun 24, 2019 $0.18; Sep 24, 2019 $0.21; Dec 23, 2019 $0.01; Jun 23, 2020 $0.21; Sep 22, 2020 $0.10; Dec 21, 2020 $0.05; Jun 24, 2021 $0.25; Sep 24, 2021 $0.14; Dec 27, 2021 $0.04; Mar 25, 2022 $0.16; Jun 24, 2022 $0.23; Sep 26, 2022 $0.11; Dec 23, 2022 $0.04; Jun 26, 2023 $0.25; Sep 25, 2023 $0.11; Dec 22, 2023 $0.13; Jun 25, 2024 $0.29; Sep 25, 2024 $0.14; Dec 26, 2024 $0.09; Jun 25, 2025 $0.32; Sep 25, 2025 $0.14; Dec 26, 2025 $0.33; Mar 26, 2026 $0.02; Jun 25, 2026 $0.09; Sep 25, 2026 $0.26. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12017202020232026YTD
MCHSIrregular · 2 paymentsAll MCHS payments⁠
One bar per payment. 2 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 18, 2024 $1.41; Dec 17, 2025 $1.16. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12017202020232026YTD

CXSE vs MCHS Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
CXSE 24.9%MCHS 31.0%since Feb 2024
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
CXSE 0.12MCHS 0.56since Feb 2024
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
CXSE −57.6%MCHS −36.6%since Jan 2024
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
CXSE 0.75MCHS 0.96

Popular comparisons

  • CXSEAvsFLCHA

    WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund · Franklin FTSE China ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.32% · 0.19%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • MCHSDvsFLCHA

    Matthews China Discovery Active ETF MCHS · Franklin FTSE China ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.89% · 0.19%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CXSEAvsMCHIA

    WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund · iShares MSCI China ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.32% · 0.59%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • MCHSDvsMCHIA

    Matthews China Discovery Active ETF MCHS · iShares MSCI China ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.89% · 0.59%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CXSEAvsGXCA

    WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund · State Street SPDR S&P China ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.32% · 0.59%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • MCHSDvsGXCA

    Matthews China Discovery Active ETF MCHS · State Street SPDR S&P China ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.89% · 0.59%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.