GXC ranks 4th and MCHS 23rd of 28 funds in the China Category.
GXC vs MCHS
GXC −0.30pt a year
0.59%0.89%
GXC 2.8×the volume
23.4K8.23K
GXC vs MCHS Performance
−19.1%+2.4%
- GXC 0.59%, better
- MCHS 0.89%
- GXC $421M
- MCHS $13M
- GXC −19.1%
- MCHS +2.4%, better
- GXC 2.46%
- MCHS 3.47%, better
- GXC 1539
- MCHS 45
- GXC 23.4K sh, better
- MCHS 8.23K sh
- GXC $80.17
- MCHS $34.29
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GXC | MCHS |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A78Higher | F10 |
| Mission | A85Higher | B62 |
| Risk | B67Higher | C50 |
| Tradability | B69Higher | C49 |
| Holdings | A76Higher | C47 |
| Durability | A84Higher | F21 |
Rank among China funds
Same Category. GXC and MCHS are both graded against the same 28 China funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GXCA
MCHSD
In short
GXC The whole China market in one ticker: roughly 1,400 stocks from megacaps down to small caps, tracked since 2007. Most China funds buy the famous names. GXC buys the phone book.
MCHS An active China stock picker in a category ruled by index trackers, run by a firm that has focused on Asia since 1991. The trade-offs: a fee at the high end of its peer group and a small, lightly traded footprint.
Stated mandate
GXC The fund seeks to provide returns that generally correspond to the total return performance of the S&P China BMI Index.
MCHS The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GXC vs MCHS Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GXC vs MCHS Cost
Overpaying MCHS vs GXC
$5,237
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GXC 0.59%
$11,635
MCHS 0.89%
$16,872
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GXC | MCHS | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,058 | $1,576 | $518 |
| 20 | $4,051 | $5,953 | $1,902 |
| 30 | $11,635 | $16,872 | $5,237 |
- 0.59%GXC, cheaper
- 0.89%MCHS
- Middle half of China funds
- Median 0.65%
GXC 5th cheapest of 28 funds
MCHS 24th cheapest of 28 funds
GXC vs MCHS Dividends
- GXC 2.46%
- MCHS 3.47%, better
- GXC $1.99
- MCHS $1.16
- GXC $0.67
- MCHS $1.16
- GXC Jun 22, 2026
- MCHS Dec 17, 2025
- GXC Jun 26, 2026
- MCHS Dec 22, 2025
- GXC Twice a year
- MCHS Irregular
Distribution history
GXC vs MCHS Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GXC 20.7%MCHS 31.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- GXC 0.27MCHS 0.56
- Worst fall
- GXC −46.5%MCHS −36.6%
- Market sensitivity
- GXC 0.69MCHS 0.96
Popular comparisons
- 0.59% · 0.32%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.32%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.