FMAT ranks 2nd and PICK 9th of 14 funds in the Materials (Broad) Category.
FMAT vs PICK
FMAT −0.31pt a year
0.08%0.39%
PICK 13.4×the volume
54K725K
PICK +2.7pt
+9.9%+12.6%
FMAT vs PICK Performance
+30.9%+68.3%
- FMAT 0.08%, better
- PICK 0.39%
- FMAT $599M
- PICK $2.18B
- FMAT +21.9%
- PICK +27.3%, better
- FMAT 1.37%
- PICK 2.34%, better
- FMAT 107
- PICK 268
- FMAT 54K sh
- PICK 725K sh, better
- FMAT $59.75
- PICK $53.99
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FMAT | PICK |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A95Higher | D31 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B55Higher | D27 |
| Tradability | C54 | B55Higher |
| Holdings | C45 | B56Higher |
| Durability | C52 | A72Higher |
Rank among Materials (Broad) funds
Same Category. FMAT and PICK are both graded against the same 14 Materials (Broad) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FMATB
PICKC
In short
FMAT The whole US materials sector in one cheap wrapper: chemicals, industrial gases, miners and packagers, roughly 120 names spanning large down to small caps, for 0.08% a year. Fidelity has run it since 2013.
PICK The miners fund that deliberately leaves out the gold. PICK tracks an index of roughly 300 global metals and mining producers with gold and silver names screened out, for 0.39% a year.
Stated mandate
FMAT The fund seeks to provide returns that generally correspond, before fees and expenses, to the MSCI USA IMI Materials Index.
PICK The fund seeks to track an index of global companies primarily engaged in mining, extracting, or producing diversified metals and industrial materials, while excluding gold and silver.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FMAT vs PICK Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FMAT vs PICK Cost
Overpaying PICK vs FMAT
$6,125
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FMAT 0.084%
$1,773
PICK 0.39%
$7,898
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FMAT | PICK | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $154 | $705 | $551 |
| 20 | $603 | $2,725 | $2,122 |
| 30 | $1,773 | $7,898 | $6,125 |
- 0.08%FMAT, cheaper
- 0.39%PICK
- Middle half of Materials (Broad) funds
- Median 0.37%
FMAT 2nd cheapest of 14 funds
PICK 9th cheapest of 14 funds
FMAT vs PICK Dividends
- FMAT 1.37%
- PICK 2.34%, better
- FMAT $0.82
- PICK $1.32
- FMAT $0.20
- PICK $0.54
- FMAT Sep 18, 2026
- PICK Jun 15, 2026
- FMAT Sep 22, 2026
- PICK Jun 18, 2026
- FMAT Quarterly
- PICK Twice a year
Distribution history
FMAT vs PICK Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FMAT
- PICK
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FMAT 17.3%, betterPICK 24.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- FMAT 0.54PICK 0.59, better
- Worst fall
- FMAT −25.4%, betterPICK −36.3%
- Market sensitivity
- FMAT 0.97PICK 1.17
FMAT and PICK in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.08% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.



