XLB ranks 1st and FMAT 2nd of 14 funds in the Materials (Broad) Category.
FMAT vs XLB
49.8%by weight
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
0.08%0.08%
XLB 195.2×the volume
57.1K11.1M
XLB +0.6pt
+10.1%+10.7%
FMAT vs XLB Performance
+34.2%+36.8%
- FMAT 0.08%
- XLB 0.08%
- FMAT $574M
- XLB $8.3B
- FMAT +18.7%
- XLB +25.3%, better
- FMAT 1.40%
- XLB 1.64%, better
- FMAT 107
- XLB 27
- FMAT 57.1K sh
- XLB 11.1M sh, better
- FMAT $58.45
- XLB $52.52
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FMAT | XLB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A95 | A95 |
| Mission | A83 | |
| Risk | B57 | A76Higher |
| Tradability | B55 | A99Higher |
| Holdings | C48Higher | C43 |
| Durability | C52 | A81Higher |
Rank among Materials (Broad) funds
Same Category. FMAT and XLB are both graded against the same 14 Materials (Broad) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FMATA
XLBA
In short
FMAT The whole US materials sector in one cheap wrapper: chemicals, industrial gases, miners and packagers, roughly 120 names spanning large down to small caps, for 0.08% a year. Fidelity has run it since 2013.
XLB The original materials play. A 1998-vintage slice of the S&P 500's chemical, mining, packaging and building-materials names, run at eight basis points and traded in size all day long.
Stated mandate
FMAT The fund seeks to provide returns that generally correspond, before fees and expenses, to the MSCI USA IMI Materials Index.
XLB The fund seeks to track, before expenses, the price and yield performance of the Materials Select Sector Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FMAT vs XLB Holdings
How FMAT and XLB differ
49.8%
Shared holdings make up 74.0% of XLB and 53.2% of FMAT.
Level by level
- Holdings49.8%
- Sector91.2%
- Country96.3%
Sector
| Sector | More in FMATMore in XLB | FMAT | XLB |
|---|---|---|---|
| Consumer Discretionary | XLB +8.9 points | 8.7% | 17.6% |
| Materials | FMAT +7.7 points | 90.1% | 82.4% |
| Health Care | FMAT +0.6 points | 0.6% | 0.0% |
| Energy | FMAT +0.5 points | 0.5% | 0.0% |
| Industrials | FMAT +0.1 points | 0.1% | 0.0% |
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in FMATMore in XLB | FMAT | XLB |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | FMAT +2.2 points | 95.5% | 93.3% |
| Ireland | XLB +1.9 points | 1.5% | 3.4% |
| United Kingdom | XLB +1.8 points | 1.5% | 3.3% |
| Switzerland | FMAT +1.4 points | 1.4% | 0.0% |
| Canada | FMAT +0.1 points | 0.1% | 0.0% |
Concentration
- FMAT58.4%
- XLB58.6%
- FMAT105
- XLB25
Asset class
- FMAT
- Equity
- XLB
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in FMAT86
- In both19
- Only in XLB6
Only in FMAT
86 securities, 48.3% of FMAT by weight
- Linde PLC15.84%
- Crh Plc(Us)4.12%
- Securities Lending Cf1.55%
- Reliance Inc1.53%
- Smurfit Westrock PLC1.52%
- Amrize Ltd1.41%
- Royal Gold Inc1.37%
- Lyondellbasell Inds Class A1.15%
- Ball Corp1.11%
- James Hardie Ind PLC1.04%
- Coeur Mining Inc0.99%
- Crown Holdings Inc0.90%
- Rpm International Inc0.87%
- Alcoa Corp0.72%
- Solstice Advanced Material Inc0.68%
- Hecla Mining Co0.66%
- Aptargroup Inc0.57%
- Element Solutions Inc0.56%
- Cleveland-Cliffs Inc0.55%
- Eastman Chemical Co0.53%
- Corteva Inc0.52%
- Commercial Metals Co0.49%
- Axalta Coating Systems Ltd0.49%
- Newmarket Corp0.41%
- Mp Materials Corp0.40%
- Eagle Materials Inc0.38%
- Balchem Corp0.37%
- Celanese Corp0.36%
- Sonoco Products Co0.34%
- Materion Corp0.33%
- Sensient Technologies Corp0.32%
- Warrior Met Coal Inc0.31%
- Perimeter Solutions Inc0.28%
- Avient Corp0.27%
- Cabot Corp0.26%
- Silgan Holdings Inc0.23%
- Knife River Holding Co W/I0.22%
- Ashland Inc0.21%
- Hawkins Inc0.20%
- Constellium SE0.20%
- Scotts Miracle Gro Co0.19%
- Fuller H B Co0.18%
- Ingevity Corp0.18%
- Graphic Packaging Holding Co0.18%
- Innospec Inc0.17%
- Century Aluminum Company0.16%
- Quaker Houghton0.15%
- Westlake Corp0.14%
- Usa Rare Earth Inc A0.14%
- Chemours Co/ The0.14%
Only in XLB
6 securities, 25.8% of XLB by weight
- Linde PLC12.65%
- Crh PLC4.66%
- Smurfit Westrock PLC3.36%
- Ball Corp2.57%
- Lyondellbasell Indu Class A2.55%
- Xab Materials DEC26<0.01%
Weight gaps
All 19 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.
| Holding | More in FMATMore in XLB | FMAT | XLB |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vulcan Materials Co | XLB +2.67 points | 2.48% | 5.15% |
| Martin Marietta Materials Inc | XLB +2.66 points | 2.18% | 4.84% |
| Steel Dynamics Inc | XLB +2.48 points | 2.36% | 4.84% |
| Ppg Industries Inc | XLB +2.20 points | 1.82% | 4.02% |
| Dow Inc | XLB +2.01 points | 1.65% | 3.66% |
| International Flavors & Fragra | XLB +1.95 points | 1.54% | 3.49% |
| Packaging Corp of America | XLB +1.86 points | 1.54% | 3.40% |
| Amcor PLC | XLB +1.80 points | 1.48% | 3.28% |
| International Paper Co | XLB +1.65 points | 1.23% | 2.88% |
| Newmont Corp | FMAT +1.63 points | 8.05% | 6.42% |
| Cf Industries Holdings Inc | XLB +1.45 points | 1.24% | 2.69% |
| Freeport Mcmoran Inc | FMAT +1.29 points | 6.47% | 5.18% |
| Avery Dennison Corp | XLB +1.13 points | 0.95% | 2.08% |
| Albemarle Corp | XLB +0.91 points | 0.75% | 1.66% |
| Nucor Corp | XLB +0.74 points | 4.16% | 4.90% |
| Mosaic Co New | XLB +0.48 points | 0.39% | 0.87% |
| Sherwin Williams Co | FMAT +0.40 points | 5.13% | 4.73% |
| Air Products & Chemicals Inc | XLB +0.24 points | 4.61% | 4.85% |
| Ecolab Inc | FMAT +0.11 points | 5.19% | 5.08% |
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FMAT vs XLB Cost
Overpaying FMAT vs XLB
$84
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FMAT 0.084%
$1,773
XLB 0.08%
$1,689
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FMAT | XLB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $154 | $147 | $7 |
| 20 | $603 | $575 | $28 |
| 30 | $1,773 | $1,689 | $84 |
- 0.08%FMAT
- 0.08%XLB
- Middle half of Materials (Broad) funds
- Median 0.37%
XLB cheapest of 14 funds
FMAT 2nd cheapest of 14 funds
FMAT vs XLB Dividends
- FMAT 1.40%
- XLB 1.64%, better
- FMAT $0.82
- XLB $0.86
- FMAT $0.20
- XLB $0.23
- FMAT Sep 18, 2026
- XLB Sep 21, 2026
- FMAT Sep 22, 2026
- XLB Sep 23, 2026
- FMAT Quarterly
- XLB Quarterly
Distribution history
FMAT vs XLB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FMAT
- XLB
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FMAT 17.3%XLB 16.6%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- FMAT 0.54XLB 0.59, better
- Worst fall
- FMAT −25.4%XLB −24.7%, better
- Market sensitivity
- FMAT 0.98XLB 0.82
FMAT and XLB in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.08% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.37%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.37%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





