Skip to content

FMAT vs XLB

Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF

FMATANYSE Arca

State Street Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF

XLBANYSE Arca

Overlap

49.8%by weight

Expense ratio

Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.

FMAT0.08%XLB0.08%

Avg volume · 30D

XLB 195.2×the volume

FMAT57.1KXLB11.1M

10Y return · a year

XLB +0.6pt

FMAT+10.1%XLB+10.7%

FMAT vs XLB Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

+34.2%FMAT+36.8%XLB

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. FMAT +34.2%. XLB +36.8%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%−10%0%10%20%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
FMAT 0.08%
XLB 0.08%
Fund size
FMAT $574M
XLB $8.3B
1Y total return
FMAT +18.7%
XLB +25.3%, better
Yield (12M)
FMAT 1.40%
XLB 1.64%, better
Holdings
FMAT 107
XLB 27
Avg volume (30D)
FMAT 57.1K sh
XLB 11.1M sh, better
NAV per share
FMAT $58.45
XLB $52.52
52W range

ETF.net Grade

FMAT: Cost 95, Risk 57, Mission not scored, Tradability 55, Holdings 48, Durability 52. XLB: Cost 95, Risk 76, Mission 83, Tradability 99, Holdings 43, Durability 81.
Pillar letters and Scores for FMAT, XLB, with each pillar’s weight
PillarFMATXLB
Cost30% weightA95A95
Mission25% weightNot scoredA83
Risk15% weightB57A76Higher
Tradability15% weightB55A99Higher
Holdings10% weightC48HigherC43
Durability5% weightC52A81Higher

Rank among Materials (Broad) funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. FMAT and XLB are both graded against the same 14 Materials (Broad) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Materials (Broad)⁠

Category · 14 funds
See all 14 ›

XLB ranks 1st and FMAT 2nd of 14 funds in the Materials (Broad) Category.

  1. Rank 1AXLBState Street Materials Select Sector SPDR ETFScore 84
  2. Rank 2AFMATFidelity MSCI Materials Index ETFScore 70
  3. Rank 3BVAWVanguard Materials ETFScore 66

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

FMATAFidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF

XLBAState Street Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF

In short

FMAT The whole US materials sector in one cheap wrapper: chemicals, industrial gases, miners and packagers, roughly 120 names spanning large down to small caps, for 0.08% a year. Fidelity has run it since 2013.

XLB The original materials play. A 1998-vintage slice of the S&P 500's chemical, mining, packaging and building-materials names, run at eight basis points and traded in size all day long.

Stated mandate

FMAT The fund seeks to provide returns that generally correspond, before fees and expenses, to the MSCI USA IMI Materials Index.

XLB The fund seeks to track, before expenses, the price and yield performance of the Materials Select Sector Index.

Why people hold it

  • FMAT Costs 0.08% a year, tied with XLB for the lowest fee among materials ETFs and a fraction of what the typical fund in the group charges.
  • Tracks MSCI's investable-market index, so the basket reaches past the mega caps into mid and small caps: roughly 120 holdings, not a dozen giants.fidelity.com
  • Does what the label says. Its returns have hugged its stated MSCI materials index, one of the stronger index implementations in its peer group.
  • Live since 2013 with a multi-hundred-million-dollar asset base and quarterly distributions.
  • XLB Charges 0.08% a year against a peer-group median of 0.38%, and nothing in the cohort undercuts it (FMAT matches).
  • Trading since December 1998 as one of the original Select Sector SPDRs, with a multi-billion-dollar asset base behind it.sec.gov
  • Very actively traded for a sector fund, which is the whole point if you use it for tactical tilts rather than buy-and-forget.
  • Clean mandate: chemicals, metals and mining, paper and forest products, containers and packaging, construction materials. No thematic drift.ssga.com

Worth knowing

  • FMAT One sector, and a cyclical one. Materials profits ride commodity prices and industrial demand, so this can move a long way from the broad market in either direction.
  • US-listed companies only, so the big Australian, Canadian and European miners sit outside the basket.fidelity.com
  • Moderately traded rather than a volume leader, so spreads can run wider than at the busiest materials funds, especially in fast markets.
  • XLB Around 26 stocks, and index rules let one name reach 25% at a quarter-end measurement. A couple of chemical giants carry outsized weight.sec.gov
  • The universe is the S&P 500 only. Smaller miners and specialty producers sit outside the net, which is the water VAW and XME fish in.ssga.com
  • One sector, tied to commodity prices and building demand, so it can travel a very different path from the broad market. Distributions come quarterly.ssga.com

Full FMAT profile⁠

Full XLB profile⁠

FMAT vs XLB Holdings

How FMAT and XLB differ

Overlap by weight

49.8%

Shared holdings make up 74.0% of XLB and 53.2% of FMAT.

Level by level

  • Holdings19 in both49.8%
  • Sector5 Sectors91.2%
  • Countryby domicile96.3%
  • Asset classEquity100%

Sector

Sector weights in FMAT and XLB, widest gap first
SectorMore in FMATMore in XLB
Consumer DiscretionaryXLB +8.9 points
MaterialsFMAT +7.7 points
Health CareFMAT +0.6 points
EnergyFMAT +0.5 points
IndustrialsFMAT +0.1 points

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in FMAT and XLB, widest gap first
CountryMore in FMATMore in XLB
United StatesFMAT +2.2 points
IrelandXLB +1.9 points
United KingdomXLB +1.8 points
SwitzerlandFMAT +1.4 points
CanadaFMAT +0.1 points

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • FMAT58.4%
  • XLB58.6%

Securities held

  • FMAT105
  • XLB25

Asset class

FMAT
Equity
XLB
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in FMAT86
  • In both19
  • Only in XLB6

Only in FMAT

86 securities, 48.3% of FMAT by weight

  • Linde PLC15.84%
  • Crh Plc(Us)4.12%
  • Securities Lending Cf1.55%

Only in XLB

6 securities, 25.8% of XLB by weight

  • Linde PLC12.65%
  • Crh PLC4.66%
  • Smurfit Westrock PLC3.36%

Weight gaps

All 19 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in FMAT and XLB, widest gap first
HoldingMore in FMATMore in XLB
Vulcan Materials CoVMCXLB +2.67 points
Martin Marietta Materials IncMLMXLB +2.66 points
Steel Dynamics IncSTLDXLB +2.48 points
Ppg Industries IncPPGXLB +2.20 points
Dow IncDOWXLB +2.01 points
International Flavors & FragraIFFXLB +1.95 points
Packaging Corp of AmericaPKGXLB +1.86 points
Amcor PLCAMCRXLB +1.80 points

All 115 FMAT holdings⁠All 24 XLB holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

FMAT vs XLB Cost

Overpaying FMAT vs XLB

$84

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • FMAT 0.084%

    $1,773

  • XLB 0.08%

    $1,689

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • FMAT 0.084%
  • XLB 0.08%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$500$1K$1.5K$2K051015202530FMAT $1,773XLB $1,689

Year by year

YearFMATXLBOverpaying
10$154$147$7
20$603$575$28
30$1,773$1,689$84

Expense ratio

  • 0.08%FMAT
  • 0.08%XLB
  • Middle half of Materials (Broad) funds
  • Median 0.37%

XLB cheapest of 14 funds

FMAT 2nd cheapest of 14 funds

FMAT vs XLB Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
FMAT 1.40%
XLB 1.64%, better
Payout (12M)
FMAT $0.82
XLB $0.86
Last payment
FMAT $0.20
XLB $0.23
Ex-dividend
FMAT Sep 18, 2026
XLB Sep 21, 2026
Paid on
FMAT Sep 22, 2026
XLB Sep 23, 2026
Frequency
FMAT Quarterly
XLB Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

FMATQuarterly · 39 paymentsAll FMAT payments⁠
One bar per payment. 39 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 17, 2017 $0.13; Jun 16, 2017 $0.14; Sep 15, 2017 $0.12; Dec 15, 2017 $0.14; Mar 16, 2018 $0.14; Jun 15, 2018 $0.16; Sep 21, 2018 $0.15; Dec 21, 2018 $0.17; Mar 15, 2019 $0.13; Jun 21, 2019 $0.19; Sep 20, 2019 $0.16; Dec 20, 2019 $0.17; Mar 20, 2020 $0.21; Jun 19, 2020 $0.15; Sep 18, 2020 $0.17; Dec 18, 2020 $0.17; Mar 19, 2021 $0.16; Jun 18, 2021 $0.18; Sep 17, 2021 $0.20; Dec 17, 2021 $0.19; Mar 18, 2022 $0.20; Jun 17, 2022 $0.27; Sep 16, 2022 $0.20; Dec 16, 2022 $0.21; Mar 17, 2023 $0.20; Jun 16, 2023 $0.21; Sep 15, 2023 $0.21; Dec 15, 2023 $0.21; Mar 15, 2024 $0.21; Jun 21, 2024 $0.19; Sep 20, 2024 $0.21; Dec 20, 2024 $0.21; Mar 21, 2025 $0.22; Jun 20, 2025 $0.22; Sep 19, 2025 $0.22; Dec 19, 2025 $0.21; Mar 20, 2026 $0.20; Jun 18, 2026 $0.21; Sep 18, 2026 $0.20. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252017202020232026YTD
XLBQuarterly · 39 paymentsAll XLB payments⁠
One bar per payment. 39 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 17, 2017 $0.08; Jun 16, 2017 $0.13; Sep 15, 2017 $0.15; Dec 15, 2017 $0.14; Mar 16, 2018 $0.11; Jun 15, 2018 $0.14; Sep 21, 2018 $0.14; Dec 21, 2018 $0.16; Mar 15, 2019 $0.12; Jun 21, 2019 $0.17; Sep 20, 2019 $0.15; Dec 20, 2019 $0.17; Mar 23, 2020 $0.13; Jun 22, 2020 $0.15; Sep 21, 2020 $0.15; Dec 21, 2020 $0.18; Mar 22, 2021 $0.16; Jun 21, 2021 $0.17; Sep 20, 2021 $0.18; Dec 20, 2021 $0.22; Mar 21, 2022 $0.16; Jun 21, 2022 $0.26; Sep 19, 2022 $0.20; Dec 19, 2022 $0.25; Mar 20, 2023 $0.16; Jun 20, 2023 $0.20; Sep 18, 2023 $0.20; Dec 18, 2023 $0.30; Mar 18, 2024 $0.16; Jun 24, 2024 $0.21; Sep 23, 2024 $0.21; Dec 23, 2024 $0.22; Mar 24, 2025 $0.20; Jun 23, 2025 $0.22; Sep 22, 2025 $0.21; Dec 22, 2025 $0.23; Mar 23, 2026 $0.21; Jun 22, 2026 $0.19; Sep 21, 2026 $0.23. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252017202020232026YTD

FMAT vs XLB Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • FMAT
  • XLB
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: XLB −24.7% · Sep 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−25%−20%−15%−10%−5%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
FMAT 17.3%XLB 16.6%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
FMAT 0.54XLB 0.59, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
FMAT −25.4%XLB −24.7%, better
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
FMAT 0.98XLB 0.82

FMAT and XLB in the news

Popular comparisons

  • FMATAvsVAWB

    Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF · Vanguard Materials ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.08% · 0.09%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XLBAvsVAWB

    State Street Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF · Vanguard Materials ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.08% · 0.09%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FMATAvsXMEB

    Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.08% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XLBAvsXMEB

    State Street Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.08% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FMATAvsIYMB

    Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF · iShares U.S. Basic Materials ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.08% · 0.37%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XLBAvsIYMB

    State Street Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF · iShares U.S. Basic Materials ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.08% · 0.37%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.