FNCL ranks 2nd and VFH 4th of 18 funds in the Financials (Broad) Category.
FNCL vs VFH
FNCL −0.01pt a year
0.08%0.09%
VFH 4.7×the volume
123K579K
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
+12.9%+12.9%
FNCL vs VFH Performance
+52.4%+52.3%
- FNCL 0.08%, better
- VFH 0.09%
- FNCL $2.24B
- VFH $13.9B
- FNCL +9.6%
- VFH +9.6%
- FNCL 1.61%
- VFH 1.71%, better
- FNCL 386
- VFH 426
- FNCL 123K sh
- VFH 579K sh, better
- FNCL $79.91
- VFH $137.29
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FNCL | VFH |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A97Higher | A88 |
| Mission | A81 | |
| Risk | C53 | C53 |
| Tradability | A71Higher | B56 |
| Holdings | C54Higher | C53 |
| Durability | B56 | A84Higher |
Rank among Financials (Broad) funds
Same Category. FNCL and VFH are both graded against the same 18 Financials (Broad) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FNCLA
VFHB
In short
FNCL The whole financial food chain in one cheap wrapper: FNCL tracks an MSCI index of about 400 US banks, insurers, exchanges and payment names for 0.08% a year.
VFH Financials without the size filter. VFH holds roughly 400 US financial stocks, from the megabanks down to small regional lenders and insurers, for 0.09% a year.
Stated mandate
FNCL The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the performance of the MSCI USA IMI Financials Index.
VFH VFH seeks to track the MSCI US Investable Market Index (IMI)/Financials 25/50, providing passively managed, multicapitalization exposure to U.S. financial-sector equities.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FNCL vs VFH Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FNCL vs VFH Cost
Overpaying VFH vs FNCL
$125
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FNCL 0.084%
$1,773
VFH 0.09%
$1,898
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FNCL | VFH | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $154 | $165 | $11 |
| 20 | $603 | $646 | $43 |
| 30 | $1,773 | $1,898 | $125 |
- 0.08%FNCL, cheaper
- 0.09%VFH
- Middle half of Financials (Broad) funds
- Median 0.37%
FNCL 2nd cheapest of 18 funds
VFH 3rd cheapest of 18 funds
FNCL vs VFH Dividends
- FNCL 1.61%
- VFH 1.71%, better
- FNCL $1.29
- VFH $2.35
- FNCL $0.31
- VFH $0.45
- FNCL Sep 18, 2026
- VFH Sep 23, 2026
- FNCL Sep 22, 2026
- VFH Sep 25, 2026
- FNCL Quarterly
- VFH Quarterly
Distribution history
FNCL vs VFH Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FNCL
- VFH
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FNCL 15.8%, betterVFH 15.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- FNCL 1.11VFH 1.11Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Worst fall
- FNCL −25.7%VFH −25.7%Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Market sensitivity
- FNCL 0.92VFH 0.82
FNCL and VFH in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.08% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.38%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.38%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
