VTWO ranks 3rd and FNDA 10th of 16 funds in the US Small-Cap Category.
FNDA vs VTWO
VTWO −0.19pt a year
0.25%0.06%
VTWO 1.01×the volume
1.49M1.5M
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
+10.2%+10.2%
FNDA vs VTWO Performance
+35.9%+25.6%
- FNDA 0.25%
- VTWO 0.06%, better
- FNDA $8.78B
- VTWO $16.6B
- FNDA +20.7%, better
- VTWO +18.3%
- FNDA 1.21%, better
- VTWO 1.19%
- FNDA 905
- VTWO 2002
- FNDA 1.49M sh
- VTWO 1.5M sh, better
- FNDA $35.50
- VTWO $110.58
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FNDA | VTWO |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D34 | A75Higher |
| Mission | A79 | A100Higher |
| Risk | B60Higher | D38 |
| Tradability | A85Higher | B57 |
| Holdings | B68 | B69Higher |
| Durability | B65 | A81Higher |
Rank among US Small-Cap funds
Same Category. FNDA and VTWO are both graded against the same 16 US Small-Cap funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FNDAB
VTWOA
In short
FNDA Most small-cap index funds size positions by stock price. FNDA sizes them by fundamental measures of business size instead, which tilts the portfolio toward value. Schwab's contrarian take on small-cap indexing.
VTWO The Russell 2000 is the small-cap benchmark every headline quotes. VTWO is Vanguard's cheap seat on it: about 2,000 small US companies for 0.06% a year, a fraction of the fee on the best-known fund tracking the same index.
Stated mandate
FNDA The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, an index representing small U.S. companies selected and weighted according to fundamental size measures.
VTWO The fund invests in stocks in the Russell 2000 Index and seeks to closely track that index's return, representing small-cap U.S. stock exposure.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FNDA vs VTWO Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FNDA vs VTWO Cost
Overpaying FNDA vs VTWO
$3,889
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FNDA 0.25%
$5,159
VTWO 0.06%
$1,270
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FNDA | VTWO | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $455 | $110 | $345 |
| 20 | $1,769 | $432 | $1,337 |
| 30 | $5,159 | $1,270 | $3,889 |
- 0.25%FNDA
- 0.06%VTWO, cheaper
- Middle half of US Small-Cap funds
- Median 0.20%
VTWO 4th cheapest of 16 funds
FNDA 10th cheapest of 16 funds
FNDA vs VTWO Dividends
- FNDA 1.21%, better
- VTWO 1.19%
- FNDA $0.44
- VTWO $1.36
- FNDA $0.13
- VTWO $0.39
- FNDA Sep 23, 2026
- VTWO Sep 23, 2026
- FNDA Sep 28, 2026
- VTWO Sep 25, 2026
- FNDA Quarterly
- VTWO Quarterly
Distribution history
FNDA vs VTWO Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FNDA
- VTWO
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FNDA 17.6%, betterVTWO 19.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- FNDA 0.77VTWO 0.86, better
- Worst fall
- FNDA −25.9%, betterVTWO −31.5%
- Market sensitivity
- FNDA 1.06VTWO 1.15
FNDA and VTWO in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.25% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.



