VB ranks 2nd and FNDA 10th of 16 funds in the US Small-Cap Category.
FNDA vs VB
VB −0.22pt a year
0.25%0.03%
FNDA 3.0×the volume
1.49M491K
VB +0.8pt
+10.2%+11.0%
FNDA vs VB Performance
+35.9%+33.0%
- FNDA 0.25%
- VB 0.03%, better
- FNDA $8.78B
- VB $76.9B
- FNDA +20.7%, better
- VB +17.8%
- FNDA 1.21%
- VB 1.24%, better
- FNDA 905
- VB 1309
- FNDA 1.49M sh, better
- VB 491K sh
- FNDA $35.50
- VB $285.63
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FNDA | VB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D34 | A91Higher |
| Mission | A79 | A86Higher |
| Risk | B60 | B63Higher |
| Tradability | A85Higher | C54 |
| Holdings | B68Higher | B59 |
| Durability | B65 | A86Higher |
Rank among US Small-Cap funds
Same Category. FNDA and VB are both graded against the same 16 US Small-Cap funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FNDAB
VBA
In short
FNDA Most small-cap index funds size positions by stock price. FNDA sizes them by fundamental measures of business size instead, which tilts the portfolio toward value. Schwab's contrarian take on small-cap indexing.
VB Vanguard's small-cap workhorse: roughly 1,400 smaller US companies for three basis points. The CRSP index behind it shifts stocks between size bands in two half steps instead of one jump, which holds turnover down. Trading since 2004.
Stated mandate
FNDA The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, an index representing small U.S. companies selected and weighted according to fundamental size measures.
VB The fund seeks to track the CRSP US Small Cap Index, which measures the investment performance of small U.S. companies. It uses an indexing approach and generally replicates the index by holding its securities in approximately their index weights.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FNDA vs VB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FNDA vs VB Cost
Overpaying FNDA vs VB
$4,521
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FNDA 0.25%
$5,159
VB 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FNDA | VB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $455 | $55 | $400 |
| 20 | $1,769 | $216 | $1,553 |
| 30 | $5,159 | $638 | $4,521 |
- 0.25%FNDA
- 0.03%VB, cheaper
- Middle half of US Small-Cap funds
- Median 0.20%
VB cheapest of 16 funds
FNDA 10th cheapest of 16 funds
FNDA vs VB Dividends
- FNDA 1.21%
- VB 1.24%, better
- FNDA $0.44
- VB $3.65
- FNDA $0.13
- VB $0.85
- FNDA Sep 23, 2026
- VB Sep 28, 2026
- FNDA Sep 28, 2026
- VB Sep 30, 2026
- FNDA Quarterly
- VB Quarterly
Distribution history
FNDA vs VB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FNDA
- VB
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FNDA 17.6%VB 16.4%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- FNDA 0.77VB 0.89, better
- Worst fall
- FNDA −25.9%, betterVB −28.0%
- Market sensitivity
- FNDA 1.06VB 1.07
FNDA and VB in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.25% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.



