Skip to content

FNX vs VYM

First Trust Mid Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund

FNXCNasdaq

Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF

VYMANYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

VYM −0.58pt a year

FNX0.62%VYM0.04%

Avg volume · 30D

VYM 76.7×the volume

FNX14.9KVYM1.14M

10Y return · a year

VYM +0.1pt

FNX+11.9%VYM+12.0%

FNX vs VYM Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

+45.4%FNX+74.3%VYM

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. FNX +45.4%. VYM +74.3%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%0%20%60%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
FNX 0.62%
VYM 0.04%, better
Fund size
FNX $1.41B
VYM $95.8B
1Y total return
FNX +14.7%
VYM +19.3%, better
Yield (12M)
FNX 0.98%
VYM 2.24%, better
Holdings
FNX 452
VYM 601
Avg volume (30D)
FNX 14.9K sh
VYM 1.14M sh, better
NAV per share
FNX $141.27
VYM $163.75
52W range

ETF.net Grade

FNX: Cost 11, Risk 30, Mission 99, Tradability 52, Holdings 84, Durability 70. VYM: Cost 99, Risk 84, Mission 79, Tradability 61, Holdings 53, Durability 95.
Pillar letters and Scores for FNX, VYM, with each pillar’s weight
PillarFNXVYM
Cost30% weightF11A99Higher
Mission25% weightA99HigherA79
Risk15% weightD30A84Higher
Tradability15% weightC52B61Higher
Holdings10% weightA84HigherC53
Durability5% weightA70A95Higher

Rank among US Multifactor funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. FNX and VYM are both graded against the same 99 US Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Multifactor⁠

Category · 99 funds
See all 99 ›

VYM ranks 2nd and FNX 56th of 99 funds in the US Multifactor Category.

  1. Rank 1AVONVVanguard Russell 1000 Value ETFScore 85
  2. Rank 2AILCViShares Morningstar Value ETFScore 81
  3. Rank 2AVYMVanguard High Dividend Yield ETFScore 81
  4. Rank 4AIMCViShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Value ETFScore 80
  5. Rank 56CFLQSFranklin U.S. Small Cap Multifactor Index ETFScore 52
  6. Rank 56CFNXFirst Trust Mid Cap Core AlphaDEX FundScore 52
  7. Rank 56CGRPMInvesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETFScore 52

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

FNXCFirst Trust Mid Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund

VYMAVanguard High Dividend Yield ETF

In short

FNX One of the original smart-beta funds (2007): FNX runs the Nasdaq US 600 mid caps through First Trust's AlphaDEX growth-and-value screen and holds roughly 500 survivors. Screened mid-cap exposure, priced closer to active management.

VYM The no-frills dividend workhorse. VYM buys the higher-yielding end of the US market, roughly 600 names, for four basis points: no quality screen, no dividend-growth-streak test, just yield, at scale since 2006.

Stated mandate

FNX The Fund is an exchange-traded fund seeking results that generally correspond to the price and yield of the Nasdaq AlphaDEX Mid Cap Core Index before fees and expenses. The index uses an enhanced selection process for stocks from the Nasdaq US 600 Mid Cap Index.

VYM The Fund seeks to track a benchmark index measuring the investment return of common stocks from companies characterized by high dividend yields.

Why people hold it

  • FNX Launched in 2007, before smart beta was even a marketing category. The AlphaDEX screen has been grinding through mid caps for more than 15 years.ftportfolios.com
  • Not a closet mid-cap index. Names are pulled from the Nasdaq US 600 Mid Cap universe by an enhanced selection process that scores stocks on growth and value marks.ftportfolios.com
  • Roughly 500 holdings, so no single stock steers the fund. Distributions land quarterly.
  • A multi-billion-dollar fund and the mid-cap anchor of First Trust's AlphaDEX lineup, which has kept the strategy funded through multiple market cycles.
  • VYM Four basis points a year, against a peer-group median near 0.32%. Cheaper than cohort neighbors VONV (0.06%) and FNDX (0.25%).
  • Running since 2006 and now a multi-billion-dollar fund that trades actively, so ordinary orders tend to fill at tight spreads.
  • Simple mandate: track the FTSE High Dividend Yield Index of US common stocks screened on yield. No manager discretion, no options overlay, plain 1940-Act fund.vanguard.com
  • Pays quarterly, and among 100-plus value and multifactor rivals it stands as one of the strongest overall packages in the group.

Worth knowing

  • FNX At 0.62%, it sits near the top of the US multifactor cost range. Broad rivals such as VONV and IUSG charge a small fraction of that.
  • Thinly traded next to the category's giants, so the spread you pay at the screen can matter as much as the expense ratio.
  • Screening on growth and value together means the portfolio can look nothing like a plain mid-cap index, in either direction. That is the design, not a defect.
  • VYM The screen is yield, not payout growth or dividend quality, so a company can qualify simply because its share price fell.
  • This is a value slice by design, tilted to established payers, so it behaves differently from a total US market fund.
  • Roughly 600 holdings, but weight leans toward the largest payers, so the top of the roster does more of the work than the count suggests.

Full FNX profile⁠

Full VYM profile⁠

FNX vs VYM Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

FNX vs VYM Cost

Overpaying FNX vs VYM

$11,330

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • FNX 0.62%

    $12,179

  • VYM 0.04%

    $849

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • FNX 0.62%
  • VYM 0.04%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.5K$5K$7.5K$10K$12.5K051015202530FNX $12,179VYM $849

Year by year

YearFNXVYMOverpaying
10$1,111$73$1,038
20$4,246$288$3,958
30$12,179$849$11,330

Expense ratio

  • 0.62%FNX
  • 0.04%VYM, cheaper
  • Middle half of US Multifactor funds
  • Median 0.29%

VYM cheapest of 99 funds

FNX 88th cheapest of 99 funds

FNX vs VYM Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
FNX 0.98%
VYM 2.24%, better
Payout (12M)
FNX $1.38
VYM $3.68
Last payment
FNX $0.41
VYM $0.89
Ex-dividend
FNX Sep 24, 2026
VYM Sep 18, 2026
Paid on
FNX Sep 30, 2026
VYM Sep 22, 2026
Frequency
FNX Quarterly
VYM Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

FNXQuarterly · 39 paymentsAll FNX payments⁠
One bar per payment. 39 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 23, 2017 $0.08; Jun 22, 2017 $0.13; Sep 21, 2017 $0.12; Dec 21, 2017 $0.26; Mar 22, 2018 $0.02; Jun 21, 2018 $0.20; Sep 14, 2018 $0.10; Dec 18, 2018 $0.26; Mar 21, 2019 $0.05; Jun 14, 2019 $0.15; Sep 25, 2019 $0.29; Dec 13, 2019 $0.39; Mar 26, 2020 $0.10; Jun 25, 2020 $0.18; Sep 24, 2020 $0.25; Dec 24, 2020 $0.34; Mar 25, 2021 $0.01; Jun 24, 2021 $0.17; Sep 23, 2021 $0.37; Dec 23, 2021 $0.41; Mar 25, 2022 $0.17; Jun 24, 2022 $0.20; Sep 23, 2022 $0.30; Dec 23, 2022 $0.38; Mar 24, 2023 $0.28; Jun 27, 2023 $0.21; Sep 22, 2023 $0.24; Dec 22, 2023 $0.44; Mar 21, 2024 $0.17; Jun 27, 2024 $0.35; Sep 26, 2024 $0.48; Dec 13, 2024 $0.47; Mar 27, 2025 $0.26; Jun 26, 2025 $0.27; Sep 25, 2025 $0.19; Dec 12, 2025 $0.39; Mar 26, 2026 $0.31; Jun 25, 2026 $0.27; Sep 24, 2026 $0.41. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12017202020232026YTD
VYMQuarterly · 39 paymentsAll VYM payments⁠
One bar per payment. 39 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 22, 2017 $0.56; Jun 23, 2017 $0.60; Sep 20, 2017 $0.60; Dec 21, 2017 $0.64; Mar 26, 2018 $0.61; Jun 22, 2018 $0.63; Sep 26, 2018 $0.67; Dec 24, 2018 $0.74; Mar 25, 2019 $0.65; Jun 17, 2019 $0.62; Sep 24, 2019 $0.79; Dec 23, 2019 $0.78; Mar 10, 2020 $0.55; Jun 22, 2020 $0.84; Sep 21, 2020 $0.71; Dec 21, 2020 $0.81; Mar 22, 2021 $0.66; Jun 21, 2021 $0.75; Sep 20, 2021 $0.75; Dec 20, 2021 $0.94; Mar 21, 2022 $0.66; Jun 21, 2022 $0.85; Sep 19, 2022 $0.77; Dec 19, 2022 $0.97; Mar 20, 2023 $0.72; Jun 20, 2023 $0.88; Sep 18, 2023 $0.78; Dec 18, 2023 $1.10; Mar 15, 2024 $0.66; Jun 21, 2024 $1.02; Sep 20, 2024 $0.85; Dec 20, 2024 $0.96; Mar 21, 2025 $0.85; Jun 20, 2025 $0.86; Sep 19, 2025 $0.84; Dec 19, 2025 $0.95; Mar 20, 2026 $0.86; Jun 18, 2026 $0.98; Sep 18, 2026 $0.89. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12017202020232026YTD

FNX vs VYM Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • FNX
  • VYM
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: FNX −25.0% · Apr 2025. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%−15%−10%−5%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
FNX 17.1%VYM 11.1%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
FNX 0.85VYM 1.38, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
FNX −25.0%VYM −15.9%, better
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
FNX 1.07VYM 0.75

FNX and VYM in the news

Popular comparisons

  • FNXCvsVONVA

    First Trust Mid Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund · Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.62% · 0.06%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • VYMAvsVONVA

    Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF · Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.04% · 0.06%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FNXCvsILCVA

    First Trust Mid Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund · iShares Morningstar Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.62% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • VYMAvsILCVA

    Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF · iShares Morningstar Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.04% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FNXCvsIMCVA

    First Trust Mid Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund · iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.62% · 0.06%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • VYMAvsIMCVA

    Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF · iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.04% · 0.06%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.