FOWF ranks 4th and WDAF 12th of 25 funds in the Defense & Aerospace Category.
FOWF vs WDAF
WDAF −0.04pt a year
0.49%0.45%
WDAF 4.3×the volume
1.79K7.68K
FOWF vs WDAF Performance
+12.2%−19.2%
- FOWF 0.49%
- WDAF 0.45%, better
- FOWF $15M
- WDAF $9M
- FOWF +12.2%, better
- WDAF −19.2%
- FOWF 0.74%
- WDAF
- FOWF 88
- WDAF 71
- FOWF 1.79K sh
- WDAF 7.68K sh, better
- FOWF $35.06
- WDAF $25.07
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FOWF | WDAF |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C52 | B66Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | A89Higher | F14 |
| Tradability | C46Higher | D30 |
| Holdings | A75Higher | C42 |
| Durability | B64Higher | C47 |
Rank among Defense & Aerospace funds
Same Category. FOWF and WDAF are both graded against the same 25 Defense & Aerospace funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FOWFB
WDAFC
In short
FOWF Most defense funds are built around the old primes. FOWF tracks the Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare Index, aimed at companies behind emerging defense technology across the U.S. and allied nations.
WDAF Most defense ETFs are a story about the US primes. WDAF flips the map: a rules-based basket of Asia-Pacific defense names, weighted toward the companies that earn the biggest share of their revenue from defense.
Stated mandate
FOWF The Fund seeks capital appreciation by tracking companies that support critical emerging defense technologies in the U.S. and its allied nations.
WDAF The Fund seeks to follow the pre-fee price and yield performance of the WisdomTree Asia Defense Index. It uses passive indexing with representative sampling and normally invests at least 80% of net assets in index constituents or economically similar investments.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FOWF vs WDAF Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FOWF vs WDAF Cost
Overpaying FOWF vs WDAF
$751
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FOWF 0.49%
$9,792
WDAF 0.45%
$9,041
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FOWF | WDAF | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $883 | $812 | $71 |
| 20 | $3,394 | $3,128 | $266 |
| 30 | $9,792 | $9,041 | $751 |
- 0.49%FOWF
- 0.45%WDAF, cheaper
- Middle half of Defense & Aerospace funds
- Median 0.50%
WDAF 7th cheapest of 25 funds
FOWF 11th cheapest of 25 funds
FOWF vs WDAF Dividends
- FOWF 0.74%
- WDAF
- FOWF $0.26
- WDAF
- FOWF $0.06
- WDAF $0.04
- FOWF Sep 3, 2026
- WDAF Dec 26, 2025
- FOWF Sep 8, 2026
- WDAF Dec 30, 2025
- FOWF Quarterly
- WDAF Irregular
Distribution history
FOWF vs WDAF Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FOWF 13.1%WDAF 37.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- FOWF 1.36WDAF −0.49
- Worst fall
- FOWF −12.3%WDAF −34.6%
- Market sensitivity
- FOWF 0.55WDAF 1.24
Popular comparisons
- 0.49% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.37%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.37%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.