ICLN ranks 1st and FRNW 2nd of 16 funds in the Clean Energy Category.
FRNW vs ICLN
ICLN −0.01pt a year
0.39%0.38%
ICLN 86.6×the volume
72.2K6.25M
FRNW +2.0pt
−6.3%−8.3%
FRNW vs ICLN Performance
−27.8%−35.2%
- FRNW 0.39%
- ICLN 0.38%, better
- FRNW $91M
- ICLN $1.94B
- FRNW −5.9%, better
- ICLN −10.6%
- FRNW 1.23%, better
- ICLN 1.20%
- FRNW 66
- ICLN 124
- FRNW 72.2K sh
- ICLN 6.25M sh, better
- FRNW $19.96
- ICLN $15.35
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FRNW | ICLN |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A93 | A100Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B65Higher | B55 |
| Tradability | B65 | A84Higher |
| Holdings | A83Higher | B59 |
| Durability | C48 | A92Higher |
Rank among Clean Energy funds
Same Category. FRNW and ICLN are both graded against the same 16 Clean Energy funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FRNWA
ICLNA
In short
FRNW Fidelity wrote its own clean energy index, then priced the fund at 0.39% a year, matching the category's cheapest heavyweights and undercutting most rivals. Roughly 60 global stocks: solar, wind, and the grid gear behind them.
ICLN The big, global way to own the energy transition: since 2008, ICLN has tracked roughly 100 clean-power companies across developed and emerging markets, charging 0.38% a year, below the typical clean-energy fee.
Stated mandate
FRNW The fund seeks returns that generally track the Fidelity Clean Energy Index before fees and expenses.
ICLN The fund seeks to track an index representing global equities in the clean energy sector.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FRNW vs ICLN Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FRNW vs ICLN Cost
Overpaying FRNW vs ICLN
$192
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FRNW 0.39%
$7,898
ICLN 0.38%
$7,706
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FRNW | ICLN | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $705 | $688 | $17 |
| 20 | $2,725 | $2,658 | $67 |
| 30 | $7,898 | $7,706 | $192 |
- 0.39%FRNW
- 0.38%ICLN, cheaper
- Middle half of Clean Energy funds
- Median 0.59%
ICLN cheapest of 16 funds
FRNW 2nd cheapest of 16 funds
FRNW vs ICLN Dividends
- FRNW 1.23%, better
- ICLN 1.20%
- FRNW $0.24
- ICLN $0.18
- FRNW $0.05
- ICLN $0.06
- FRNW Sep 18, 2026
- ICLN Jun 15, 2026
- FRNW Sep 22, 2026
- ICLN Jun 18, 2026
- FRNW Quarterly
- ICLN Twice a year
Distribution history
FRNW vs ICLN Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FRNW
- ICLN
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FRNW 27.0%, betterICLN 27.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- FRNW 0.44, betterICLN 0.22
- Worst fall
- FRNW −59.4%ICLN −57.1%, better
- Market sensitivity
- FRNW 1.53ICLN 1.49
FRNW and ICLN in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.39% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.38% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.38% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.38% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

