Skip to content

FRNW vs ICLN

Fidelity Clean Energy ETF

FRNWACboe

iShares Global Clean Energy ETF

ICLNANasdaq

Overlap

Expense ratio

ICLN −0.01pt a year

FRNW0.39%ICLN0.38%

Avg volume · 30D

ICLN 86.6×the volume

FRNW72.2KICLN6.25M

5Y return · a year

FRNW +2.0pt

FRNW−6.3%ICLN−8.3%

FRNW vs ICLN Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

−27.8%FRNW−35.2%ICLN

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. FRNW −27.8%. ICLN −35.2%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−50%−20%−10%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
FRNW 0.39%
ICLN 0.38%, better
Fund size
FRNW $91M
ICLN $1.94B
1Y total return
FRNW −5.9%, better
ICLN −10.6%
Yield (12M)
FRNW 1.23%, better
ICLN 1.20%
Holdings
FRNW 66
ICLN 124
Avg volume (30D)
FRNW 72.2K sh
ICLN 6.25M sh, better
NAV per share
FRNW $19.96
ICLN $15.35
52W range

ETF.net Grade

FRNW: Cost 93, Risk 65, Mission not scored, Tradability 65, Holdings 83, Durability 48. ICLN: Cost 100, Risk 55, Mission not scored, Tradability 84, Holdings 59, Durability 92.
Pillar letters and Scores for FRNW, ICLN, with each pillar’s weight
PillarFRNWICLN
Cost30% weightA93A100Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightB65HigherB55
Tradability15% weightB65A84Higher
Holdings10% weightA83HigherB59
Durability5% weightC48A92Higher

Rank among Clean Energy funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. FRNW and ICLN are both graded against the same 16 Clean Energy funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Clean Energy⁠

Category · 16 funds
See all 16 ›

ICLN ranks 1st and FRNW 2nd of 16 funds in the Clean Energy Category.

  1. Rank 1AICLNiShares Global Clean Energy ETFScore 81
  2. Rank 2AFRNWFidelity Clean Energy ETFScore 77
  3. Rank 3BCNRGState Street SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETFScore 66

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

FRNWAFidelity Clean Energy ETF

ICLNAiShares Global Clean Energy ETF

In short

FRNW Fidelity wrote its own clean energy index, then priced the fund at 0.39% a year, matching the category's cheapest heavyweights and undercutting most rivals. Roughly 60 global stocks: solar, wind, and the grid gear behind them.

ICLN The big, global way to own the energy transition: since 2008, ICLN has tracked roughly 100 clean-power companies across developed and emerging markets, charging 0.38% a year, below the typical clean-energy fee.

Stated mandate

FRNW The fund seeks returns that generally track the Fidelity Clean Energy Index before fees and expenses.

ICLN The fund seeks to track an index representing global equities in the clean energy sector.

Why people hold it

  • FRNW 0.39% a year ties the low-cost leader of the group (ICLN) and comes in under CNRG at 0.45% and FAN at 0.61%. In a theme where fees often run higher, that is real money kept.
  • Global by mandate, not US-only. The index reaches clean energy companies worldwide, so the fund follows the industry rather than one country's subsidy calendar.
  • A plain index fund, not a stock-picking bet: it aims to track the Fidelity Clean Energy Index before fees, so what you own is spelled out in the methodology.
  • One of the stronger builds in a crowded clean energy shelf on our review, with the low fee and a spread-out portfolio doing the heavy lifting. Pays quarterly.
  • ICLN At 0.38% with no waiver propping it up, it undercuts FRNW (0.39%) and CNRG (0.45%) and sits below the category median fee.
  • Global by design: the S&P index draws from developed and emerging markets, so you get Europe's wind and grid names, not just US solar.blackrock.com
  • Liquidity is built into the rules. Index entrants need $300M market cap and $3M median daily trading, and the fund itself trades very actively.blackrock.com
  • A multi-billion-dollar iShares fund running since 2008, and one of the strongest implementations in its peer group.

Worth knowing

  • FRNW One theme, one industry. Clean energy names swing with interest rates, policy shifts, and equipment prices, so the ride is far choppier than a broad market fund.
  • Roughly 60 stocks. That is focused enough that a handful of names and a couple of countries carry real weight in the outcome.
  • Not one of the giants. A mid-size asset base and moderate trading activity can mean wider bid-ask spreads than the category's most heavily traded funds.
  • ICLN One theme, about 100 stocks. Renewable developers and utilities are capital-intensive, so interest-rate moves land hard here.spglobal.com
  • Emerging-market listings come with the global reach, adding currency and local-market risk.blackrock.com
  • Weights blend float market cap with a clean-energy exposure score, so some holdings are partial players, not pure plays.spglobal.comblackrock.com

Full FRNW profile⁠

Full ICLN profile⁠

FRNW vs ICLN Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

FRNW vs ICLN Cost

Overpaying FRNW vs ICLN

$192

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • FRNW 0.39%

    $7,898

  • ICLN 0.38%

    $7,706

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • FRNW 0.39%
  • ICLN 0.38%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K051015202530FRNW $7,898ICLN $7,706

Year by year

YearFRNWICLNOverpaying
10$705$688$17
20$2,725$2,658$67
30$7,898$7,706$192

Expense ratio

  • 0.39%FRNW
  • 0.38%ICLN, cheaper
  • Middle half of Clean Energy funds
  • Median 0.59%

ICLN cheapest of 16 funds

FRNW 2nd cheapest of 16 funds

FRNW vs ICLN Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
FRNW 1.23%, better
ICLN 1.20%
Payout (12M)
FRNW $0.24
ICLN $0.18
Last payment
FRNW $0.05
ICLN $0.06
Ex-dividend
FRNW Sep 18, 2026
ICLN Jun 15, 2026
Paid on
FRNW Sep 22, 2026
ICLN Jun 18, 2026
Frequency
FRNW Quarterly
ICLN Twice a year

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

FRNWQuarterly · 20 paymentsAll FRNW payments⁠
One bar per payment. 20 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 17, 2021 $0.01; Mar 18, 2022 $0.02; Jun 17, 2022 $0.09; Sep 16, 2022 $0.03; Dec 16, 2022 $0.01; Mar 17, 2023 $0.03; Jun 16, 2023 $0.10; Sep 15, 2023 $0.07; Dec 15, 2023 $0.03; Mar 15, 2024 $0.02; Jun 21, 2024 $0.10; Sep 20, 2024 $0.06; Dec 20, 2024 $0.02; Mar 21, 2025 $0.01; Jun 20, 2025 $0.12; Sep 19, 2025 $0.08; Dec 19, 2025 $0.04; Mar 20, 2026 $0.02; Jun 18, 2026 $0.14; Sep 18, 2026 $0.05. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.102017202020232026YTD
ICLNTwice a year · 21 paymentsAll ICLN payments⁠
One bar per payment. 21 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Jun 20, 2017 $0.14; Dec 21, 2017 $0.09; Jun 19, 2018 $0.12; Dec 18, 2018 $0.11; Jun 17, 2019 $0.08; Dec 16, 2019 $0.08; Jun 15, 2020 $0.05; Dec 14, 2020 $0.03; Dec 30, 2020 $0.01; Jun 10, 2021 $0.12; Dec 13, 2021 $0.11; Dec 30, 2021 $0.01; Jun 9, 2022 $0.14; Dec 13, 2022 $0.04; Jun 7, 2023 $0.12; Dec 20, 2023 $0.12; Jun 11, 2024 $0.10; Dec 17, 2024 $0.11; Jun 16, 2025 $0.14; Dec 16, 2025 $0.13; Jun 15, 2026 $0.06. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.102017202020232026YTD

FRNW vs ICLN Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • FRNW
  • ICLN
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: FRNW −59.4% · Apr 2025. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−60%−40%−20%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
FRNW 27.0%, betterICLN 27.3%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
FRNW 0.44, betterICLN 0.22
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
FRNW −59.4%ICLN −57.1%, better
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
FRNW 1.53ICLN 1.49

FRNW and ICLN in the news

Popular comparisons

  • FRNWAvsCNRGB

    Fidelity Clean Energy ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.45%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ICLNAvsCNRGB

    iShares Global Clean Energy ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.38% · 0.45%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FRNWAvsIBATB

    Fidelity Clean Energy ETF · iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.47%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ICLNAvsIBATB

    iShares Global Clean Energy ETF · iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.38% · 0.47%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FRNWAvsFANB

    Fidelity Clean Energy ETF · First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ICLNAvsFANB

    iShares Global Clean Energy ETF · First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.38% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.