Skip to content

FAN vs FRNW

First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF

FANBNYSE Arca

Fidelity Clean Energy ETF

FRNWACboe

Overlap

29.8%by weight

Expense ratio

FRNW −0.21pt a year

FAN0.60%FRNW0.39%

Avg volume · 30D

FAN 1.03×the volume

FAN74.2KFRNW72.2K

5Y return · a year

FAN +7.6pt

FAN+1.3%FRNW−6.3%

FAN vs FRNW Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

+6.9%FAN−27.8%FRNW

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. FAN +6.9%. FRNW −27.8%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−60%−40%20%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
FAN 0.60%
FRNW 0.39%, better
Fund size
FAN $186M
FRNW $91M
1Y total return
FAN +8.7%, better
FRNW −5.9%
Yield (12M)
FAN 0.95%
FRNW 1.23%, better
Holdings
FAN 50
FRNW 66
Avg volume (30D)
FAN 74.2K sh, better
FRNW 72.2K sh
NAV per share
FAN $21.87
FRNW $19.96
52W range

ETF.net Grade

FAN: Cost 40, Risk 90, Mission not scored, Tradability 59, Holdings 52, Durability 75. FRNW: Cost 93, Risk 65, Mission not scored, Tradability 65, Holdings 83, Durability 48.
Pillar letters and Scores for FAN, FRNW, with each pillar’s weight
PillarFANFRNW
Cost30% weightC40A93Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightA90HigherB65
Tradability15% weightB59B65Higher
Holdings10% weightC52A83Higher
Durability5% weightA75HigherC48

Rank among Clean Energy funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. FAN and FRNW are both graded against the same 16 Clean Energy funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Clean Energy⁠

Category · 16 funds
See all 16 ›

FRNW ranks 2nd and FAN 5th of 16 funds in the Clean Energy Category.

  1. Rank 1AICLNiShares Global Clean Energy ETFScore 81
  2. Rank 2AFRNWFidelity Clean Energy ETFScore 77
  3. Rank 3BCNRGState Street SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETFScore 66
  4. Rank 4BIBATiShares Energy Storage & Materials ETFScore 65
  5. Rank 5BFANFirst Trust Global Wind Energy ETFScore 57
  6. Rank 6CQCLNFirst Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index FundScore 55

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

FANBFirst Trust Global Wind Energy ETF

FRNWAFidelity Clean Energy ETF

In short

FAN Wind, and only wind. Tracking a global index since 2008, FAN reserves 60% of the weight for pure-play turbine makers and wind-farm operators, with diversified multinationals taking the rest.

FRNW Fidelity wrote its own clean energy index, then priced the fund at 0.39% a year, matching the category's cheapest heavyweights and undercutting most rivals. Roughly 60 global stocks: solar, wind, and the grid gear behind them.

Stated mandate

FAN The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the ISE Clean Edge Global Wind Energy Index, an equity index focused on companies active in wind energy.

FRNW The fund seeks returns that generally track the Fidelity Clean Energy Index before fees and expenses.

Why people hold it

  • FAN Broad clean-energy funds blend solar, storage and grid hardware. This index stays on wind: farm developers, power producers, and machinery built specifically for the industry.ftportfolios.com
  • The 60/40 split is deliberate, keeping smaller wind-only names (50%+ of revenue or generating capacity from wind) from being drowned out by multinationals with a wind division.ftportfolios.comsec.gov
  • Trading since June 2008, it predates most of the clean-energy shelf and has run through the theme's full boom and bust. Roughly 50 stocks worldwide, distributions paid quarterly.
  • One of the stronger overall builds in a crowded clean-energy peer group, and among the steadier ones in that group on measured risk.
  • FRNW 0.39% a year ties the low-cost leader of the group (ICLN) and comes in under CNRG at 0.45% and FAN at 0.61%. In a theme where fees often run higher, that is real money kept.
  • Global by mandate, not US-only. The index reaches clean energy companies worldwide, so the fund follows the industry rather than one country's subsidy calendar.
  • A plain index fund, not a stock-picking bet: it aims to track the Fidelity Clean Energy Index before fees, so what you own is spelled out in the methodology.
  • One of the stronger builds in a crowded clean energy shelf on our review, with the low fee and a spread-out portfolio doing the heavy lifting. Pays quarterly.

Worth knowing

  • FAN 0.60% net of a waiver through January 31, 2027 (0.61% gross) sits near the category median, but above ICLN at 0.38% and FRNW at 0.39%, neither waiver-dependent.
  • One industry, roughly 50 global names. Turbine order books, power prices and policy shifts move this more than they move a diversified energy fund.
  • Assets and volume are moderate next to the category's largest funds, so spreads can widen; worth checking the quote before trading.
  • FRNW One theme, one industry. Clean energy names swing with interest rates, policy shifts, and equipment prices, so the ride is far choppier than a broad market fund.
  • Roughly 60 stocks. That is focused enough that a handful of names and a couple of countries carry real weight in the outcome.
  • Not one of the giants. A mid-size asset base and moderate trading activity can mean wider bid-ask spreads than the category's most heavily traded funds.

Full FAN profile⁠

Full FRNW profile⁠

FAN vs FRNW Holdings

How FAN and FRNW differ

Overlap by weight

29.8%

Shared holdings make up 62.6% of FAN and 36.6% of FRNW.

Level by level

  • Holdings15 in both29.8%
  • Countryby domicile61.7%
  • Sector6 Sectors78.6%
  • Asset classEquity100%

Sector

Sector weights in FAN and FRNW, widest gap first
SectorMore in FANMore in FRNW
TechnologyFRNW +21.0 points
IndustrialsFAN +13.2 points
UtilitiesFAN +5.6 points
Consumer DiscretionaryFAN +2.1 points
EnergyFAN +0.5 points
MaterialsFRNW +0.4 points

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in FAN and FRNW, widest gap first
CountryMore in FANMore in FRNW
United StatesFRNW +23.5 points
DenmarkFAN +8.4 points
ItalyFAN +6.7 points
GermanyFAN +6.6 points
SpainFAN +5.0 points
PortugalFRNW +4.2 points
New ZealandFRNW +3.9 points
AustriaFRNW +3.1 points
Other countries (14)FAN +8.0 points

Outside the US: FAN 76% developed, 24% emerging. FRNW 72% developed, 28% emerging.

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • FAN54.8%
  • FRNW43.4%

Securities held

  • FAN45
  • FRNW55

Asset class

FAN
Equity
FRNW
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in FAN30
  • In both15
  • Only in FRNW40

Only in FAN

30 securities, 37.3% of FAN by weight

  • Iberdrola S.A.2.35%
  • Alliant Energy Corporation2.33%
  • NextEra Energy, Inc.2.25%

Only in FRNW

40 securities, 72.2% of FRNW by weight

  • Securities Lending Cf8.92%
  • Bloom Energy Corp Class A4.32%
  • Edp S.a.4.16%

Weight gaps

All 15 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in FAN and FRNW, widest gap first
HoldingMore in FANMore in FRNW
EDP Renewables SAFAN +5.92 points
Nordex SEFAN +5.77 points
Orsted A/SFAN +5.05 points
China Longyuan Power Group Corporation Limited (Class H)FAN +3.77 points
Cadeler A/SFAN +3.30 points
Vestas Wind Systems A/SFAN +3.28 points
ERG SpAFAN +2.64 points
GE Vernova Inc.GEVFRNW +2.53 points

All 45 FAN holdings⁠All 65 FRNW holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

FAN vs FRNW Cost

Overpaying FAN vs FRNW

$3,919

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • FAN 0.60%

    $11,817

  • FRNW 0.39%

    $7,898

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • FAN 0.60%
  • FRNW 0.39%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.5K$5K$7.5K$10K$12.5K051015202530FAN $11,817FRNW $7,898

Year by year

YearFANFRNWOverpaying
10$1,076$705$371
20$4,116$2,725$1,391
30$11,817$7,898$3,919

Expense ratio

  • 0.60%FAN
  • 0.39%FRNW, cheaper
  • Middle half of Clean Energy funds
  • Median 0.59%

FRNW 2nd cheapest of 16 funds

FAN 10th cheapest of 16 funds

FAN vs FRNW Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
FAN 0.95%
FRNW 1.23%, better
Payout (12M)
FAN $0.21
FRNW $0.24
Last payment
FAN $0.07
FRNW $0.05
Ex-dividend
FAN Sep 24, 2026
FRNW Sep 18, 2026
Paid on
FAN Sep 30, 2026
FRNW Sep 22, 2026
Frequency
FAN Quarterly
FRNW Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

FANQuarterly · 37 paymentsAll FAN payments⁠
One bar per payment. 37 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 23, 2017 $0.05; Jun 22, 2017 $0.24; Sep 21, 2017 $0.06; Mar 22, 2018 $0.04; Jun 21, 2018 $0.15; Sep 14, 2018 $0.06; Dec 18, 2018 $0.06; Mar 21, 2019 $0.09; Jun 14, 2019 $0.10; Sep 25, 2019 $0.06; Dec 13, 2019 $0.10; Mar 26, 2020 $0.04; Jun 25, 2020 $0.09; Sep 24, 2020 $0.03; Dec 24, 2020 $0.03; Mar 25, 2021 $0.05; Jun 24, 2021 $0.11; Sep 23, 2021 $0.14; Dec 23, 2021 $0.06; Mar 25, 2022 $0.03; Jun 24, 2022 $0.10; Sep 23, 2022 $0.09; Dec 23, 2022 $0.04; Mar 24, 2023 $0.04; Jun 27, 2023 $0.12; Sep 22, 2023 $0.08; Dec 22, 2023 $0.04; Mar 21, 2024 $0.03; Jun 27, 2024 $0.13; Sep 26, 2024 $0.05; Dec 13, 2024 $0.03; Mar 27, 2025 $0.02; Jun 26, 2025 $0.11; Sep 25, 2025 $0.09; Dec 12, 2025 $0.05; Jun 25, 2026 $0.09; Sep 24, 2026 $0.07. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252017202020232026YTD
FRNWQuarterly · 20 paymentsAll FRNW payments⁠
One bar per payment. 20 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 17, 2021 $0.01; Mar 18, 2022 $0.02; Jun 17, 2022 $0.09; Sep 16, 2022 $0.03; Dec 16, 2022 $0.01; Mar 17, 2023 $0.03; Jun 16, 2023 $0.10; Sep 15, 2023 $0.07; Dec 15, 2023 $0.03; Mar 15, 2024 $0.02; Jun 21, 2024 $0.10; Sep 20, 2024 $0.06; Dec 20, 2024 $0.02; Mar 21, 2025 $0.01; Jun 20, 2025 $0.12; Sep 19, 2025 $0.08; Dec 19, 2025 $0.04; Mar 20, 2026 $0.02; Jun 18, 2026 $0.14; Sep 18, 2026 $0.05. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252017202020232026YTD

FAN vs FRNW Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • FAN
  • FRNW
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: FRNW −59.4% · Apr 2025. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−60%−40%−20%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
FAN 20.3%, betterFRNW 27.0%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
FAN 0.72, betterFRNW 0.44
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
FAN −37.9%, betterFRNW −59.4%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
FAN 0.98FRNW 1.53

FAN and FRNW in the news

Popular comparisons

  • FANBvsICLNA

    First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF · iShares Global Clean Energy ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.38%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FRNWAvsICLNA

    Fidelity Clean Energy ETF · iShares Global Clean Energy ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.38%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FANBvsCNRGB

    First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.45%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FRNWAvsCNRGB

    Fidelity Clean Energy ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.45%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FANBvsIBATB

    First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF · iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.47%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FRNWAvsIBATB

    Fidelity Clean Energy ETF · iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.47%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.