Skip to content

FRNW vs IBAT

Fidelity Clean Energy ETF

FRNWACboe

iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF

IBATBNasdaq

Overlap

Expense ratio

FRNW −0.08pt a year

FRNW0.39%IBAT0.47%

Avg volume · 30D

FRNW 3.0×the volume

FRNW72.2KIBAT23.8K

FRNW vs IBAT Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

−5.9%FRNW+13.3%IBAT

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. FRNW −5.9%. IBAT +13.3%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.30%40%50%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
FRNW 0.39%, better
IBAT 0.47%
Fund size
FRNW $91M
IBAT $56M
1Y total return
FRNW −5.9%
IBAT +13.3%, better
Yield (12M)
FRNW 1.23%, better
IBAT 0.84%
Holdings
FRNW 66
IBAT 97
Avg volume (30D)
FRNW 72.2K sh, better
IBAT 23.8K sh
NAV per share
FRNW $19.96
IBAT $35.92
52W range

ETF.net Grade

FRNW: Cost 93, Risk 65, Mission not scored, Tradability 65, Holdings 83, Durability 48. IBAT: Cost 83, Risk 73, Mission not scored, Tradability 37, Holdings 55, Durability 36.
Pillar letters and Scores for FRNW, IBAT, with each pillar’s weight
PillarFRNWIBAT
Cost30% weightA93HigherA83
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightB65A73Higher
Tradability15% weightB65HigherD37
Holdings10% weightA83HigherB55
Durability5% weightC48HigherD36

Rank among Clean Energy funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. FRNW and IBAT are both graded against the same 16 Clean Energy funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Clean Energy⁠

Category · 16 funds
See all 16 ›

FRNW ranks 2nd and IBAT 4th of 16 funds in the Clean Energy Category.

  1. Rank 1AICLNiShares Global Clean Energy ETFScore 81
  2. Rank 2AFRNWFidelity Clean Energy ETFScore 77
  3. Rank 3BCNRGState Street SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETFScore 66
  4. Rank 4BIBATiShares Energy Storage & Materials ETFScore 65
  5. Rank 5BFANFirst Trust Global Wind Energy ETFScore 57

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

FRNWAFidelity Clean Energy ETF

IBATBiShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF

In short

FRNW Fidelity wrote its own clean energy index, then priced the fund at 0.39% a year, matching the category's cheapest heavyweights and undercutting most rivals. Roughly 60 global stocks: solar, wind, and the grid gear behind them.

IBAT Most EV funds buy carmakers. IBAT drops a layer down the supply chain to the batteries, hydrogen, fuel cells and storage materials underneath, tracking a global STOXX index at a fee that undercuts much of its thematic peer group.

Stated mandate

FRNW The fund seeks returns that generally track the Fidelity Clean Energy Index before fees and expenses.

IBAT The fund seeks to track an index of global companies involved in battery technologies, hydrogen, fuel cells, and other energy-storage solutions. It provides targeted exposure to companies supporting the transition to a low-carbon economy.

Why people hold it

  • FRNW 0.39% a year ties the low-cost leader of the group (ICLN) and comes in under CNRG at 0.45% and FAN at 0.61%. In a theme where fees often run higher, that is real money kept.
  • Global by mandate, not US-only. The index reaches clean energy companies worldwide, so the fund follows the industry rather than one country's subsidy calendar.
  • A plain index fund, not a stock-picking bet: it aims to track the Fidelity Clean Energy Index before fees, so what you own is spelled out in the methodology.
  • One of the stronger builds in a crowded clean energy shelf on our review, with the low fee and a spread-out portfolio doing the heavy lifting. Pays quarterly.
  • IBAT 0.47% a year, cheaper than Global X's DRIV (0.68%) and Amplify's BATT (0.59%).
  • Buys the storage layer, not the showroom: battery technology, hydrogen, fuel cells and the materials that feed them.ishares.com
  • Global mandate, roughly 80 holdings: miners, chemical firms and equipment makers a US large-cap index never touches.
  • Sits in the upper tier of its battery and EV thematic group on our review.

Worth knowing

  • FRNW One theme, one industry. Clean energy names swing with interest rates, policy shifts, and equipment prices, so the ride is far choppier than a broad market fund.
  • Roughly 60 stocks. That is focused enough that a handful of names and a couple of countries carry real weight in the outcome.
  • Not one of the giants. A mid-size asset base and moderate trading activity can mean wider bid-ask spreads than the category's most heavily traded funds.
  • IBAT One theme, one supply chain. Battery and materials demand drives the whole basket in the same direction at the same time.
  • BlackRock applies business involvement screens, so the portfolio is a filtered slice of the industry rather than the full map.ishares.com
  • Launched in 2024, so the record is short and payouts come once or twice a year at most. Not an income holding.

Full FRNW profile⁠

Full IBAT profile⁠

FRNW vs IBAT Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

FRNW vs IBAT Cost

Overpaying IBAT vs FRNW

$1,520

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • FRNW 0.39%

    $7,898

  • IBAT 0.47%

    $9,418

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • FRNW 0.39%
  • IBAT 0.47%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K$10K051015202530IBAT $9,418FRNW $7,898

Year by year

YearFRNWIBATOverpaying
10$705$847$142
20$2,725$3,261$536
30$7,898$9,418$1,520

Expense ratio

  • 0.39%FRNW, cheaper
  • 0.47%IBAT
  • Middle half of Clean Energy funds
  • Median 0.59%

FRNW 2nd cheapest of 16 funds

IBAT 4th cheapest of 16 funds

FRNW vs IBAT Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
FRNW 1.23%, better
IBAT 0.84%
Payout (12M)
FRNW $0.24
IBAT $0.30
Last payment
FRNW $0.05
IBAT $0.18
Ex-dividend
FRNW Sep 18, 2026
IBAT Jun 15, 2026
Paid on
FRNW Sep 22, 2026
IBAT Jun 18, 2026
Frequency
FRNW Quarterly
IBAT Twice a year

Distribution history

Per share, 2021 to 2026, same scale for both

FRNWQuarterly · 20 paymentsAll FRNW payments⁠
One bar per payment. 20 payments from 2021 to 2026 YTD. Dec 17, 2021 $0.01; Mar 18, 2022 $0.02; Jun 17, 2022 $0.09; Sep 16, 2022 $0.03; Dec 16, 2022 $0.01; Mar 17, 2023 $0.03; Jun 16, 2023 $0.10; Sep 15, 2023 $0.07; Dec 15, 2023 $0.03; Mar 15, 2024 $0.02; Jun 21, 2024 $0.10; Sep 20, 2024 $0.06; Dec 20, 2024 $0.02; Mar 21, 2025 $0.01; Jun 20, 2025 $0.12; Sep 19, 2025 $0.08; Dec 19, 2025 $0.04; Mar 20, 2026 $0.02; Jun 18, 2026 $0.14; Sep 18, 2026 $0.05. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.2020232026YTD
IBATTwice a year · 5 paymentsAll IBAT payments⁠
One bar per payment. 5 payments from 2021 to 2026 YTD. Jun 11, 2024 $0.18; Dec 17, 2024 $0.12; Jun 16, 2025 $0.21; Dec 16, 2025 $0.12; Jun 15, 2026 $0.18. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.2020232026YTD

FRNW vs IBAT Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
FRNW 27.0%IBAT 30.2%since Apr 2024
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
FRNW 0.44IBAT 0.48since Apr 2024
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
FRNW −59.4%IBAT −28.2%since Mar 2024
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
FRNW 1.53IBAT 1.57

FRNW and IBAT in the news

Popular comparisons

  • FRNWAvsICLNA

    Fidelity Clean Energy ETF · iShares Global Clean Energy ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.38%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • IBATBvsICLNA

    iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF · iShares Global Clean Energy ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.47% · 0.38%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FRNWAvsCNRGB

    Fidelity Clean Energy ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.45%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • IBATBvsCNRGB

    iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.47% · 0.45%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FRNWAvsFANB

    Fidelity Clean Energy ETF · First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • IBATBvsFANB

    iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF · First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.47% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.