Skip to content

FXZ vs XLB

First Trust Materials AlphaDEX Fund

FXZDNYSE Arca

State Street Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF

XLBANYSE Arca

Overlap

32.8%by weight

Expense ratio

XLB −0.56pt a year

FXZ0.64%XLB0.08%

Avg volume · 30D

XLB 264.2×the volume

FXZ42.2KXLB11.1M

10Y return · a year

XLB +0.5pt

FXZ+10.2%XLB+10.7%

FXZ vs XLB Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

+34.8%FXZ+36.8%XLB

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. FXZ +34.8%. XLB +36.8%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%0%20%60%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
FXZ 0.64%
XLB 0.08%, better
Fund size
FXZ $357M
XLB $8.3B
1Y total return
FXZ +25.7%, better
XLB +25.3%
Yield (12M)
FXZ 1.38%
XLB 1.64%, better
Holdings
FXZ 40
XLB 27
Avg volume (30D)
FXZ 42.2K sh
XLB 11.1M sh, better
NAV per share
FXZ $74.46
XLB $52.52
52W range

ETF.net Grade

FXZ: Cost 9, Risk 41, Mission 59, Tradability 66, Holdings 80, Durability 47. XLB: Cost 95, Risk 76, Mission 83, Tradability 99, Holdings 43, Durability 81.
Pillar letters and Scores for FXZ, XLB, with each pillar’s weight
PillarFXZXLB
Cost30% weightF9A95Higher
Mission25% weightB59A83Higher
Risk15% weightC41A76Higher
Tradability15% weightB66A99Higher
Holdings10% weightA80HigherC43
Durability5% weightC47A81Higher

Rank among Materials (Broad) funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. FXZ and XLB are both graded against the same 14 Materials (Broad) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Materials (Broad)⁠

Category · 14 funds
See all 14 ›

XLB ranks 1st and FXZ 11th of 14 funds in the Materials (Broad) Category.

  1. Rank 1AXLBState Street Materials Select Sector SPDR ETFScore 84
  2. Rank 2AFMATFidelity MSCI Materials Index ETFScore 70
  3. Rank 9CTRUMVanEck Materials TruSector ETFScore 40
  4. Rank 11DFXZFirst Trust Materials AlphaDEX FundScore 38
  5. Rank 12DWOODiShares Global Timber & Forestry ETFScore 34

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

FXZDFirst Trust Materials AlphaDEX Fund

XLBAState Street Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF

In short

FXZ Most materials ETFs hand you the sector exactly as the market weights it. FXZ re-sorts it: the AlphaDEX rules rank Russell 1000 materials stocks on growth and value measures, then hold roughly 40 of them. Same sector, different shopping list.

XLB The original materials play. A 1998-vintage slice of the S&P 500's chemical, mining, packaging and building-materials names, run at eight basis points and traded in size all day long.

Stated mandate

FXZ The fund seeks to track the performance of the StrataQuant® Materials Index, an equity index that applies the AlphaDEX® methodology to selected Russell 1000® materials-sector stocks.

XLB The fund seeks to track, before expenses, the price and yield performance of the Materials Select Sector Index.

Why people hold it

  • FXZ Not a cap-weighted sector wrapper. The AlphaDEX screen ranks Russell 1000 materials names on growth and value measures and keeps roughly 40, so weight follows the screen rather than company size.ftportfolios.com
  • In a sector where a handful of chemical and industrial-gas giants dominate cap-weighted funds, the rules push meaningful weight toward smaller and mid-sized materials companies.ftportfolios.com
  • Running since 2007, which gives the methodology a long public track record across full commodity and rate cycles instead of a few years of backtest.
  • XLB Charges 0.08% a year against a peer-group median of 0.38%, and nothing in the cohort undercuts it (FMAT matches).
  • Trading since December 1998 as one of the original Select Sector SPDRs, with a multi-billion-dollar asset base behind it.sec.gov
  • Very actively traded for a sector fund, which is the whole point if you use it for tactical tilts rather than buy-and-forget.
  • Clean mandate: chemicals, metals and mining, paper and forest products, containers and packaging, construction materials. No thematic drift.ssga.com

Worth knowing

  • FXZ Cost is the trade-off: 0.64% a year, one of the pricier options in the materials group, where the big cap-weighted funds (XLB, VAW, FMAT) charge single-digit basis points.
  • A screened portfolio of roughly 40 names can behave quite differently from the plain materials sector in either direction. It tracks the StrataQuant Materials Index, not the sector everyone quotes.
  • Trading is moderate rather than heavy, so spreads and order size matter more here than with the most heavily traded funds in the category. Distributions come quarterly.
  • XLB Around 26 stocks, and index rules let one name reach 25% at a quarter-end measurement. A couple of chemical giants carry outsized weight.sec.gov
  • The universe is the S&P 500 only. Smaller miners and specialty producers sit outside the net, which is the water VAW and XME fish in.ssga.com
  • One sector, tied to commodity prices and building demand, so it can travel a very different path from the broad market. Distributions come quarterly.ssga.com

Full FXZ profile⁠

Full XLB profile⁠

FXZ vs XLB Holdings

How FXZ and XLB differ

Overlap by weight

32.8%

Shared holdings make up 60.1% of XLB and 39.4% of FXZ.

Level by level

  • Holdings14 in both32.8%
  • Sector3 Sectors85.8%
  • Countryby domicile93.3%
  • Asset classEquity100%

Sector

Sector weights in FXZ and XLB, widest gap first
SectorMore in FXZMore in XLB
Consumer DiscretionaryXLB +14.2 points
IndustrialsFXZ +14.1 points
MaterialsFXZ +0.1 points

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in FXZ and XLB, widest gap first
CountryMore in FXZMore in XLB
United StatesFXZ +4.9 points
IrelandXLB +3.4 points
United KingdomXLB +3.3 points
CanadaFXZ +1.8 points

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • FXZ44.0%
  • XLB58.6%

Securities held

  • FXZ39
  • XLB25

Asset class

FXZ
Equity
XLB
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in FXZ25
  • In both14
  • Only in XLB11

Only in FXZ

25 securities, 60.4% of FXZ by weight

  • Alcoa Corporation4.59%
  • Southern Copper Corporation4.31%
  • AngloGold Ashanti plc4.17%

Only in XLB

11 securities, 39.7% of XLB by weight

  • Vulcan Materials Co5.15%
  • Martin Marietta Materials4.84%
  • Sherwin Williams Co/The4.73%

Weight gaps

All 14 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in FXZ and XLB, widest gap first
HoldingMore in FXZMore in XLB
Linde PlcLINXLB +9.85 points
Air Products and Chemicals, Inc.APDXLB +3.87 points
Freeport-McMoRan Inc.FCXXLB +3.64 points
Ecolab Inc.ECLXLB +3.18 points
CF Industries Holdings, Inc.CFFXZ +2.57 points
The Mosaic CompanyMOSFXZ +2.05 points
International Paper CompanyIPXLB +1.94 points
Newmont CorporationNEMXLB +1.88 points

All 39 FXZ holdings⁠All 24 XLB holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

FXZ vs XLB Cost

Overpaying FXZ vs XLB

$10,849

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • FXZ 0.64%

    $12,538

  • XLB 0.08%

    $1,689

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • FXZ 0.64%
  • XLB 0.08%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530FXZ $12,538XLB $1,689

Year by year

YearFXZXLBOverpaying
10$1,145$147$998
20$4,375$575$3,800
30$12,538$1,689$10,849

Expense ratio

  • 0.64%FXZ
  • 0.08%XLB, cheaper
  • Middle half of Materials (Broad) funds
  • Median 0.37%

XLB cheapest of 14 funds

FXZ 13th cheapest of 14 funds

FXZ vs XLB Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
FXZ 1.38%
XLB 1.64%, better
Payout (12M)
FXZ $1.03
XLB $0.86
Last payment
FXZ $0.25
XLB $0.23
Ex-dividend
FXZ Sep 24, 2026
XLB Sep 21, 2026
Paid on
FXZ Sep 30, 2026
XLB Sep 23, 2026
Frequency
FXZ Quarterly
XLB Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

FXZQuarterly · 39 paymentsAll FXZ payments⁠
One bar per payment. 39 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 23, 2017 $0.09; Jun 22, 2017 $0.13; Sep 21, 2017 $0.09; Dec 21, 2017 $0.14; Mar 22, 2018 $0.03; Jun 21, 2018 $0.14; Sep 14, 2018 $0.11; Dec 18, 2018 $0.17; Mar 21, 2019 $0.08; Jun 14, 2019 $0.08; Sep 25, 2019 $0.27; Dec 13, 2019 $0.20; Mar 26, 2020 $0.15; Jun 25, 2020 $0.15; Sep 24, 2020 $0.24; Dec 24, 2020 $0.19; Mar 25, 2021 $0.13; Jun 24, 2021 $0.15; Sep 23, 2021 $0.17; Dec 23, 2021 $0.24; Mar 25, 2022 $0.09; Jun 24, 2022 $0.25; Sep 23, 2022 $0.35; Dec 23, 2022 $0.26; Mar 24, 2023 $0.25; Jun 27, 2023 $0.48; Sep 22, 2023 $0.32; Dec 22, 2023 $0.31; Mar 21, 2024 $0.19; Jun 27, 2024 $0.21; Sep 26, 2024 $0.28; Dec 13, 2024 $0.34; Mar 27, 2025 $0.21; Jun 26, 2025 $0.23; Sep 25, 2025 $0.31; Dec 12, 2025 $0.37; Mar 26, 2026 $0.24; Jun 25, 2026 $0.16; Sep 24, 2026 $0.25. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502017202020232026YTD
XLBQuarterly · 39 paymentsAll XLB payments⁠
One bar per payment. 39 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 17, 2017 $0.08; Jun 16, 2017 $0.13; Sep 15, 2017 $0.15; Dec 15, 2017 $0.14; Mar 16, 2018 $0.11; Jun 15, 2018 $0.14; Sep 21, 2018 $0.14; Dec 21, 2018 $0.16; Mar 15, 2019 $0.12; Jun 21, 2019 $0.17; Sep 20, 2019 $0.15; Dec 20, 2019 $0.17; Mar 23, 2020 $0.13; Jun 22, 2020 $0.15; Sep 21, 2020 $0.15; Dec 21, 2020 $0.18; Mar 22, 2021 $0.16; Jun 21, 2021 $0.17; Sep 20, 2021 $0.18; Dec 20, 2021 $0.22; Mar 21, 2022 $0.16; Jun 21, 2022 $0.26; Sep 19, 2022 $0.20; Dec 19, 2022 $0.25; Mar 20, 2023 $0.16; Jun 20, 2023 $0.20; Sep 18, 2023 $0.20; Dec 18, 2023 $0.30; Mar 18, 2024 $0.16; Jun 24, 2024 $0.21; Sep 23, 2024 $0.21; Dec 23, 2024 $0.22; Mar 24, 2025 $0.20; Jun 23, 2025 $0.22; Sep 22, 2025 $0.21; Dec 22, 2025 $0.23; Mar 23, 2026 $0.21; Jun 22, 2026 $0.19; Sep 21, 2026 $0.23. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502017202020232026YTD

FXZ vs XLB Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • FXZ
  • XLB
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: FXZ −34.0% · Apr 2025. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−30%−20%−10%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
FXZ 19.9%XLB 16.6%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
FXZ 0.32XLB 0.59, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
FXZ −34.0%XLB −24.7%, better
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
FXZ 0.92XLB 0.82

FXZ and XLB in the news

Popular comparisons

  • FXZDvsFMATA

    First Trust Materials AlphaDEX Fund · Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.64% · 0.08%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XLBAvsFMATA

    State Street Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF · Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.08% · 0.08%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FXZDvsVAWB

    First Trust Materials AlphaDEX Fund · Vanguard Materials ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.64% · 0.09%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XLBAvsVAWB

    State Street Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF · Vanguard Materials ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.08% · 0.09%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FXZDvsXMEB

    First Trust Materials AlphaDEX Fund · State Street SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.64% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XLBAvsXMEB

    State Street Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.08% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.