XLB ranks 1st and XME 4th of 14 funds in the Materials (Broad) Category.
XLB vs XME
XLB −0.27pt a year
0.08%0.35%
XLB 6.1×the volume
11.1M1.83M
XME +5.1pt
+10.7%+15.8%
XLB vs XME Performance
+36.8%+134.2%
- XLB 0.08%, better
- XME 0.35%
- XLB $8.3B
- XME $3.84B
- XLB +25.3%, better
- XME +1.6%
- XLB 1.64%, better
- XME 0.35%
- XLB 27
- XME 39
- XLB 11.1M sh, better
- XME 1.83M sh
- XLB $52.52
- XME $101.06
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | XLB | XME |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A95Higher | B61 |
| Mission | A83Higher | C52 |
| Risk | A76Higher | D29 |
| Tradability | A99Higher | A92 |
| Holdings | C43 | B67Higher |
| Durability | A81Higher | A70 |
Rank among Materials (Broad) funds
Same Category. XLB and XME are both graded against the same 14 Materials (Broad) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
XLBA
XMEB
In short
XLB The original materials play. A 1998-vintage slice of the S&P 500's chemical, mining, packaging and building-materials names, run at eight basis points and traded in size all day long.
XME Not the chemicals-heavy materials fund. XME holds roughly 40 miners and steelmakers on a modified equal weight, so a small copper name carries about the weight of a giant. Ore, coal and metal, since 2006.
Stated mandate
XLB The fund seeks to track, before expenses, the price and yield performance of the Materials Select Sector Index.
XME The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return performance of the S&P Metals and Mining Select Industry Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
XLB vs XME Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
XLB vs XME Cost
Overpaying XME vs XLB
$5,437
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
XLB 0.08%
$1,689
XME 0.35%
$7,126
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | XLB | XME | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $147 | $634 | $487 |
| 20 | $575 | $2,454 | $1,879 |
| 30 | $1,689 | $7,126 | $5,437 |
- 0.08%XLB, cheaper
- 0.35%XME
- Middle half of Materials (Broad) funds
- Median 0.37%
XLB cheapest of 14 funds
XME 6th cheapest of 14 funds
XLB vs XME Dividends
- XLB 1.64%, better
- XME 0.35%
- XLB $0.86
- XME $0.34
- XLB $0.23
- XME $0.07
- XLB Sep 21, 2026
- XME Sep 21, 2026
- XLB Sep 23, 2026
- XME Sep 23, 2026
- XLB Quarterly
- XME Quarterly
Distribution history
XLB vs XME Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- XLB
- XME
Risk facts
- Volatility
- XLB 16.6%, betterXME 29.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- XLB 0.59XME 0.79, better
- Worst fall
- XLB −24.7%, betterXME −37.3%
- Market sensitivity
- XLB 0.82XME 1.32
XLB and XME in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.08% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.37%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.37%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





