Skip to content

VAW vs XLB

Vanguard Materials ETF

VAWBNYSE Arca

State Street Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF

XLBANYSE Arca

Overlap

67.1%by weight

Expense ratio

XLB −0.01pt a year

VAW0.09%XLB0.08%

Avg volume · 30D

XLB 173.1×the volume

VAW64.4KXLB11.1M

10Y return · a year

XLB +0.6pt

VAW+10.1%XLB+10.7%

VAW vs XLB Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

+34.0%VAW+36.8%XLB

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. VAW +34.0%. XLB +36.8%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%−10%0%10%20%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
VAW 0.09%
XLB 0.08%, better
Fund size
VAW $4.5B
XLB $8.3B
1Y total return
VAW +18.9%
XLB +25.3%, better
Yield (12M)
VAW 1.39%
XLB 1.64%, better
Holdings
VAW 113
XLB 27
Avg volume (30D)
VAW 64.4K sh
XLB 11.1M sh, better
NAV per share
VAW $228.68
XLB $52.52
52W range

ETF.net Grade

VAW: Cost 84, Risk 60, Mission not scored, Tradability 42, Holdings 50, Durability 86. XLB: Cost 95, Risk 76, Mission 83, Tradability 99, Holdings 43, Durability 81.
Pillar letters and Scores for VAW, XLB, with each pillar’s weight
PillarVAWXLB
Cost30% weightA84A95Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredA83
Risk15% weightB60A76Higher
Tradability15% weightC42A99Higher
Holdings10% weightC50HigherC43
Durability5% weightA86HigherA81

Rank among Materials (Broad) funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. VAW and XLB are both graded against the same 14 Materials (Broad) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Materials (Broad)⁠

Category · 14 funds
See all 14 ›

XLB ranks 1st and VAW 3rd of 14 funds in the Materials (Broad) Category.

  1. Rank 1AXLBState Street Materials Select Sector SPDR ETFScore 84
  2. Rank 2AFMATFidelity MSCI Materials Index ETFScore 70
  3. Rank 3BVAWVanguard Materials ETFScore 66
  4. Rank 4BXMEState Street SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETFScore 62

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

VAWBVanguard Materials ETF

XLBAState Street Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF

In short

VAW Vanguard's materials aisle in one ticker: chemicals, packaging and metals, roughly 120 names deep, for 0.09% a year while the category norm sits several times higher.

XLB The original materials play. A 1998-vintage slice of the S&P 500's chemical, mining, packaging and building-materials names, run at eight basis points and traded in size all day long.

Stated mandate

VAW The fund seeks to track a materials-sector equity benchmark through passive indexing and normally invests at least 80% of assets in the benchmark's stocks.

XLB The fund seeks to track, before expenses, the price and yield performance of the Materials Select Sector Index.

Why people hold it

  • VAW Charges 0.09% a year, several times below the median for broad materials funds. Cheap enough that cost stops being the argument.
  • Holds about 120 stocks from MSCI's US Investable Market materials index, so it reaches down the cap ladder instead of stopping at the biggest names.
  • Plain passive indexing, at least 80% in benchmark stocks, and it has tracked that benchmark closely. One of the stronger builds in the materials group.
  • Trading since 2004 and now a multi-billion-dollar fund, run by Vanguard's index desk. Distributions arrive quarterly.
  • XLB Charges 0.08% a year against a peer-group median of 0.38%, and nothing in the cohort undercuts it (FMAT matches).
  • Trading since December 1998 as one of the original Select Sector SPDRs, with a multi-billion-dollar asset base behind it.sec.gov
  • Very actively traded for a sector fund, which is the whole point if you use it for tactical tilts rather than buy-and-forget.
  • Clean mandate: chemicals, metals and mining, paper and forest products, containers and packaging, construction materials. No thematic drift.ssga.com

Worth knowing

  • VAW One sector, and a cyclical one. Chemicals, miners and packagers ride construction and industrial demand, so swings run wider than a total-market fund.
  • Moderately traded rather than a volume monster, so spreads can widen in fast markets.
  • XLB and FMAT sit a basis point lower at 0.08%. A rounding error, but it exists.
  • XLB Around 26 stocks, and index rules let one name reach 25% at a quarter-end measurement. A couple of chemical giants carry outsized weight.sec.gov
  • The universe is the S&P 500 only. Smaller miners and specialty producers sit outside the net, which is the water VAW and XME fish in.ssga.com
  • One sector, tied to commodity prices and building demand, so it can travel a very different path from the broad market. Distributions come quarterly.ssga.com

Full VAW profile⁠

Full XLB profile⁠

VAW vs XLB Holdings

How VAW and XLB differ

Overlap by weight

67.1%

Shared holdings make up 99.8% of XLB and 74.0% of VAW.

Level by level

  • Holdings24 in both67.1%
  • Sector6 Sectors91.8%
  • Countryby domicile93.3%
  • Asset classEquity100%

Sector

Sector weights in VAW and XLB, widest gap first
SectorMore in VAWMore in XLB
Consumer DiscretionaryXLB +8.2 points
MaterialsVAW +7.0 points
IndustrialsVAW +0.6 points
Health CareVAW +0.5 points
Consumer StaplesSame weight
EnergySame weight

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in VAW and XLB, widest gap first
CountryMore in VAWMore in XLB
United StatesVAW +6.7 points
IrelandXLB +3.4 points
United KingdomXLB +3.3 points

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • VAW58.0%
  • XLB58.6%

Securities held

  • VAW111
  • XLB25

Asset class

VAW
Equity
XLB
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in VAW87
  • In both24
  • Only in XLB1

Only in VAW

87 securities, 25.8% of VAW by weight

  • Corteva Inc3.61%
  • Royal Gold Inc1.39%
  • Reliance Inc1.37%

Only in XLB

1 security, 0.0% of XLB by weight

  • Xab Materials DEC26<0.01%

Weight gaps

All 24 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in VAW and XLB, widest gap first
HoldingMore in VAWMore in XLB
Vulcan Materials CoVMCXLB +2.94 points
Martin Marietta Materials IncMLMXLB +2.84 points
Steel Dynamics IncSTLDXLB +2.73 points
Linde PLCLINVAW +2.62 points
PPG Industries IncPPGXLB +2.40 points
Dow IncDOWXLB +2.28 points
Newmont CorpNEMVAW +2.07 points
International Flavors & Fragrances IncIFFXLB +2.04 points

All 115 VAW holdings⁠All 24 XLB holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

VAW vs XLB Cost

Overpaying VAW vs XLB

$209

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • VAW 0.09%

    $1,898

  • XLB 0.08%

    $1,689

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • VAW 0.09%
  • XLB 0.08%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$500$1K$1.5K$2K051015202530VAW $1,898XLB $1,689

Year by year

YearVAWXLBOverpaying
10$165$147$18
20$646$575$71
30$1,898$1,689$209

Expense ratio

  • 0.09%VAW
  • 0.08%XLB, cheaper
  • Middle half of Materials (Broad) funds
  • Median 0.37%

XLB cheapest of 14 funds

VAW 3rd cheapest of 14 funds

VAW vs XLB Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
VAW 1.39%
XLB 1.64%, better
Payout (12M)
VAW $3.18
XLB $0.86
Last payment
VAW $0.78
XLB $0.23
Ex-dividend
VAW Sep 23, 2026
XLB Sep 21, 2026
Paid on
VAW Sep 25, 2026
XLB Sep 23, 2026
Frequency
VAW Quarterly
XLB Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

VAWQuarterly · 39 paymentsAll VAW payments⁠
One bar per payment. 39 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 24, 2017 $0.50; Jun 28, 2017 $0.55; Sep 27, 2017 $0.61; Dec 14, 2017 $0.57; Mar 16, 2018 $0.37; Jun 28, 2018 $0.66; Sep 24, 2018 $0.59; Dec 13, 2018 $0.63; Mar 21, 2019 $0.57; Jun 21, 2019 $0.70; Sep 26, 2019 $0.63; Dec 16, 2019 $0.69; Mar 10, 2020 $0.54; Jun 22, 2020 $0.67; Sep 11, 2020 $0.59; Dec 17, 2020 $0.82; Mar 26, 2021 $0.56; Jun 21, 2021 $0.66; Sep 29, 2021 $0.80; Dec 16, 2021 $0.83; Mar 24, 2022 $0.64; Jun 23, 2022 $0.98; Sep 28, 2022 $0.79; Dec 15, 2022 $0.95; Mar 24, 2023 $0.68; Jun 29, 2023 $0.83; Sep 28, 2023 $0.86; Dec 19, 2023 $0.89; Mar 22, 2024 $0.68; Jun 28, 2024 $0.82; Sep 27, 2024 $0.84; Dec 18, 2024 $0.86; Mar 25, 2025 $0.83; Jun 26, 2025 $0.82; Sep 24, 2025 $0.77; Dec 17, 2025 $0.81; Mar 24, 2026 $0.79; Jun 24, 2026 $0.80; Sep 23, 2026 $0.78. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12017202020232026YTD
XLBQuarterly · 39 paymentsAll XLB payments⁠
One bar per payment. 39 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 17, 2017 $0.08; Jun 16, 2017 $0.13; Sep 15, 2017 $0.15; Dec 15, 2017 $0.14; Mar 16, 2018 $0.11; Jun 15, 2018 $0.14; Sep 21, 2018 $0.14; Dec 21, 2018 $0.16; Mar 15, 2019 $0.12; Jun 21, 2019 $0.17; Sep 20, 2019 $0.15; Dec 20, 2019 $0.17; Mar 23, 2020 $0.13; Jun 22, 2020 $0.15; Sep 21, 2020 $0.15; Dec 21, 2020 $0.18; Mar 22, 2021 $0.16; Jun 21, 2021 $0.17; Sep 20, 2021 $0.18; Dec 20, 2021 $0.22; Mar 21, 2022 $0.16; Jun 21, 2022 $0.26; Sep 19, 2022 $0.20; Dec 19, 2022 $0.25; Mar 20, 2023 $0.16; Jun 20, 2023 $0.20; Sep 18, 2023 $0.20; Dec 18, 2023 $0.30; Mar 18, 2024 $0.16; Jun 24, 2024 $0.21; Sep 23, 2024 $0.21; Dec 23, 2024 $0.22; Mar 24, 2025 $0.20; Jun 23, 2025 $0.22; Sep 22, 2025 $0.21; Dec 22, 2025 $0.23; Mar 23, 2026 $0.21; Jun 22, 2026 $0.19; Sep 21, 2026 $0.23. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12017202020232026YTD

VAW vs XLB Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • VAW
  • XLB
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: XLB −24.7% · Sep 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−25%−20%−15%−10%−5%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
VAW 17.3%XLB 16.6%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
VAW 0.54XLB 0.59, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
VAW −25.5%XLB −24.7%, better
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
VAW 0.98XLB 0.82

VAW and XLB in the news

Popular comparisons

  • VAWBvsFMATA

    Vanguard Materials ETF · Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.09% · 0.08%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XLBAvsFMATA

    State Street Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF · Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.08% · 0.08%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • VAWBvsXMEB

    Vanguard Materials ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.09% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XLBAvsXMEB

    State Street Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.08% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • VAWBvsIYMB

    Vanguard Materials ETF · iShares U.S. Basic Materials ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.09% · 0.37%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XLBAvsIYMB

    State Street Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF · iShares U.S. Basic Materials ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.08% · 0.37%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.