SLVP ranks 3rd and GBUG 17th of 18 funds in the Precious Metals Miners Category.
GBUG vs SLVP
SLVP −0.51pt a year
0.90%0.39%
SLVP 7.9×the volume
31.8K253K
GBUG vs SLVP Performance
+11.4%+11.4%
- GBUG 0.90%
- SLVP 0.39%, better
- GBUG $146M
- SLVP $730M
- GBUG +11.4%
- SLVP +11.4%
- GBUG
- SLVP 2.43%
- GBUG 44
- SLVP 47
- GBUG 31.8K sh
- SLVP 253K sh, better
- GBUG $40.02
- SLVP $28.98
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GBUG | SLVP |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F6 | A79Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B61Higher | C53 |
| Tradability | D34 | A75Higher |
| Holdings | A82Higher | F21 |
| Durability | D31 | A79Higher |
Rank among Precious Metals Miners funds
Same Category. GBUG and SLVP are both graded against the same 18 Precious Metals Miners funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GBUGD
SLVPB
In short
GBUG Sprott is a precious-metals house first, an ETF shop second. GBUG is its stock-picker answer to index miner funds: an actively managed, value-oriented and contrarian book of roughly 50 gold and silver miners, explorers and royalty names.
SLVP About 40 global silver and metals miners in one ticker, priced below the typical precious-metals miner fund. Running since 2012, and read the 'metals miners' part of the name: the index reaches past pure silver plays.
Stated mandate
GBUG The ETF is actively managed and seeks long-term capital appreciation by investing in shares of companies focused on gold and silver exploration, development, mining, royalty, and streaming activities.
SLVP The fund is designed to follow an index of worldwide companies whose principal business is silver exploration or metals mining.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GBUG vs SLVP Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GBUG vs SLVP Cost
Overpaying GBUG vs SLVP
$9,142
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GBUG 0.90%
$17,040
SLVP 0.39%
$7,898
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GBUG | SLVP | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,593 | $705 | $888 |
| 20 | $6,015 | $2,725 | $3,290 |
| 30 | $17,040 | $7,898 | $9,142 |
- 0.90%GBUG
- 0.39%SLVP, cheaper
- Middle half of Precious Metals Miners funds
- Median 0.52%
SLVP 4th cheapest of 18 funds
GBUG 17th cheapest of 18 funds
GBUG vs SLVP Dividends
- GBUG
- SLVP 2.43%
- GBUG
- SLVP $0.70
- GBUG $0.68
- SLVP $0.14
- GBUG Dec 18, 2025
- SLVP Jun 15, 2026
- GBUG Dec 22, 2025
- SLVP Jun 18, 2026
- GBUG Irregular
- SLVP Twice a year
Distribution history
GBUG vs SLVP Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GBUG 50.9%SLVP 49.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- GBUG 1.06SLVP 1.00
- Worst fall
- GBUG −37.4%SLVP −47.7%
- Market sensitivity
- GBUG 0.14SLVP 1.21
GBUG and SLVP in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.90% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.90% · 0.46%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.46%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.90% · 0.51%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.51%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
