SLVP ranks 2nd and GDMN 11th of 18 funds in the Precious Metals Miners Category.
GDMN vs SLVP
SLVP −0.06pt a year
0.45%0.39%
SLVP 4.8×the volume
52K252K
GDMN +4.4pt
+52.5%+48.1%
GDMN vs SLVP Performance
−5.2%+12.4%
- GDMN 0.45%
- SLVP 0.39%, better
- GDMN $150M
- SLVP $743M
- GDMN −5.2%
- SLVP +12.4%, better
- GDMN 8.38%, better
- SLVP 2.44%
- GDMN 59
- SLVP 47
- GDMN 52K sh
- SLVP 252K sh, better
- GDMN $65.21
- SLVP $29.48
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GDMN | SLVP |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B68 | A79Higher |
| Mission | A100 | |
| Risk | F22 | C52Higher |
| Tradability | D36 | A75Higher |
| Holdings | C45Higher | F21 |
| Durability | C45 | A79Higher |
Rank among Precious Metals Miners funds
Same Category. GDMN and SLVP are both graded against the same 18 Precious Metals Miners funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GDMNC
SLVPB
In short
GDMN Gold or the miners? GDMN declines to choose. For every $100 it aims to hold roughly $90 of global gold miners plus gold futures worth about $90 more in notional terms, stacking two gold trades into one ticker.
SLVP About 40 global silver and metals miners in one ticker, priced below the typical precious-metals miner fund. Running since 2012, and read the 'metals miners' part of the name: the index reaches past pure silver plays.
Stated mandate
GDMN The Fund seeks total return by investing in U.S.-listed gold futures contracts and global equity securities of companies deriving at least 50% of their revenue from gold mining. Gold futures are used to enhance capital efficiency.
SLVP The fund is designed to follow an index of worldwide companies whose principal business is silver exploration or metals mining.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GDMN vs SLVP Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GDMN vs SLVP Cost
Overpaying GDMN vs SLVP
$1,143
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GDMN 0.45%
$9,041
SLVP 0.39%
$7,898
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GDMN | SLVP | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $812 | $705 | $107 |
| 20 | $3,128 | $2,725 | $403 |
| 30 | $9,041 | $7,898 | $1,143 |
- 0.45%GDMN
- 0.39%SLVP, cheaper
- Middle half of Precious Metals Miners funds
- Median 0.52%
SLVP 4th cheapest of 18 funds
GDMN 6th cheapest of 18 funds
GDMN vs SLVP Dividends
- GDMN 8.38%, better
- SLVP 2.44%
- GDMN $5.51
- SLVP $0.70
- GDMN $5.28
- SLVP $0.14
- GDMN Oct 27, 2026
- SLVP Jun 15, 2026
- GDMN Oct 29, 2026
- SLVP Jun 18, 2026
- GDMN Annual
- SLVP Twice a year
Distribution history
GDMN vs SLVP Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GDMN 53.1%SLVP 49.0%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- GDMN 0.99SLVP 1.00, better
- Worst fall
- GDMN −52.8%SLVP −47.7%
- Market sensitivity
- GDMN 0.87SLVP 1.21
GDMN and SLVP in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.45% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.51%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.51%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.46%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.46%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

