GDX ranks 3rd and SIL 11th of 18 funds in the Precious Metals Miners Category.
GDX vs SIL
GDX −0.14pt a year
0.51%0.65%
GDX 20.3×the volume
21.2M1.04M
GDX +5.9pt
+13.2%+7.3%
GDX vs SIL Performance
+160.5%+94.7%
- GDX 0.51%, better
- SIL 0.65%
- GDX $23.8B
- SIL $3.68B
- GDX +7.7%
- SIL +8.3%, better
- GDX 0.82%
- SIL 1.43%, better
- GDX 61
- SIL 41
- GDX 21.2M sh, better
- SIL 1.04M sh
- GDX $77.30
- SIL $71.20
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GDX | SIL |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C50Higher | D26 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B66Higher | C45 |
| Tradability | A95Higher | A80 |
| Holdings | B57Higher | D32 |
| Durability | A88Higher | A83 |
Rank among Precious Metals Miners funds
Same Category. GDX and SIL are both graded against the same 18 Precious Metals Miners funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GDXB
SILC
In short
GDX The original gold miner ETF, running since 2006. Roughly 60 mining companies in one ticker, for people who want equity exposure to gold's economics rather than a bar in a vault.
SIL The original US silver-miner ETF, listed since 2010 and still the big, liquid name in a small aisle: about 40 global companies that mine, refine and explore for silver, rather than the metal in a vault.
Stated mandate
GDX GDX seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index, which is designed to represent companies involved in gold mining.
SIL The fund seeks to track the performance of the Solactive Global Silver Miners Total Return Index before fees and expenses, focusing on companies economically tied to silver mining.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GDX vs SIL Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GDX vs SIL Cost
Overpaying SIL vs GDX
$2,552
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GDX 0.51%
$10,165
SIL 0.65%
$12,717
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GDX | SIL | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $918 | $1,163 | $245 |
| 20 | $3,527 | $4,440 | $913 |
| 30 | $10,165 | $12,717 | $2,552 |
- 0.51%GDX, cheaper
- 0.65%SIL
- Middle half of Precious Metals Miners funds
- Median 0.52%
GDX 9th cheapest of 18 funds
SIL 12th cheapest of 18 funds
GDX vs SIL Dividends
- GDX 0.82%
- SIL 1.43%, better
- GDX $0.63
- SIL $1.02
- GDX $0.63
- SIL $0.11
- GDX Dec 22, 2025
- SIL Jun 29, 2026
- GDX Dec 26, 2025
- SIL Jul 7, 2026
- GDX Annual
- SIL Twice a year
Distribution history
GDX vs SIL Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- GDX
- SIL
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GDX 41.4%, betterSIL 46.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- GDX 0.94SIL 0.95, better
- Worst fall
- GDX −46.5%, betterSIL −47.9%
- Market sensitivity
- GDX 0.81SIL 1.06
GDX and SIL in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.51% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.51% · 0.46%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.46%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.51% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.




