GDX ranks 3rd and GDXJ 8th of 18 funds in the Precious Metals Miners Category.
GDX vs GDXJ
GDX −0.01pt a year
0.51%0.52%
GDX 4.8×the volume
21.2M4.44M
GDX +2.7pt
+13.2%+10.5%
GDX vs GDXJ Performance
+160.5%+137.4%
- GDX 0.51%, better
- GDXJ 0.52%
- GDX $23.8B
- GDXJ $7.08B
- GDX +7.7%, better
- GDXJ +3.6%
- GDX 0.82%
- GDXJ 2.79%, better
- GDX 61
- GDXJ 157
- GDX 21.2M sh, better
- GDXJ 4.44M sh
- GDX $77.30
- GDXJ $95.57
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GDX | GDXJ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C50 | C50 |
| Mission | A70 | |
| Risk | B66Higher | D37 |
| Tradability | A95Higher | A71 |
| Holdings | B57 | A85Higher |
| Durability | A88Higher | A85 |
Rank among Precious Metals Miners funds
Same Category. GDX and GDXJ are both graded against the same 18 Precious Metals Miners funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GDXB
GDXJB
In short
GDX The original gold miner ETF, running since 2006. Roughly 60 mining companies in one ticker, for people who want equity exposure to gold's economics rather than a bar in a vault.
GDXJ The junior tier of the gold trade. GDXJ tracks an index of small-cap gold and silver miners, about 120 names worldwide, and has done so since 2009. It owns the up-and-comers rather than the household-name majors.
Stated mandate
GDX GDX seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index, which is designed to represent companies involved in gold mining.
GDXJ GDXJ seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index, which represents small-capitalization companies primarily engaged in gold and/or silver mining.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GDX vs GDXJ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GDX vs GDXJ Cost
Overpaying GDXJ vs GDX
$186
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GDX 0.51%
$10,165
GDXJ 0.52%
$10,351
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GDX | GDXJ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $918 | $935 | $17 |
| 20 | $3,527 | $3,593 | $66 |
| 30 | $10,165 | $10,351 | $186 |
- 0.51%GDX, cheaper
- 0.52%GDXJ
- Middle half of Precious Metals Miners funds
- Median 0.52%
GDX 9th cheapest of 18 funds
GDXJ 10th cheapest of 18 funds
GDX vs GDXJ Dividends
- GDX 0.82%
- GDXJ 2.79%, better
- GDX $0.63
- GDXJ $2.65
- GDX $0.63
- GDXJ $2.65
- GDX Dec 22, 2025
- GDXJ Dec 22, 2025
- GDX Dec 26, 2025
- GDXJ Dec 26, 2025
- GDX Annual
- GDXJ Annual
Distribution history
GDX vs GDXJ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- GDX
- GDXJ
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GDX 41.4%, betterGDXJ 45.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- GDX 0.94, betterGDXJ 0.93
- Worst fall
- GDX −46.5%, betterGDXJ −48.8%
- Market sensitivity
- GDX 0.81GDXJ 0.88
GDX and GDXJ in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.51% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.52% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.51% · 0.46%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.52% · 0.46%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.51% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.52% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.



