Skip to content

AUMI vs SIL

Themes Gold Miners ETF

AUMIBNasdaq

Global X Silver Miners ETF

SILCNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

AUMI −0.30pt a year

AUMI0.35%SIL0.65%

Avg volume · 30D

SIL 434.9×the volume

AUMI2.4KSIL1.04M

AUMI vs SIL Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+6.1%AUMI+8.3%SIL

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. AUMI +6.1%. SIL +8.3%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.20%40%60%80%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
AUMI 0.35%, better
SIL 0.65%
Fund size
AUMI $19M
SIL $3.68B
1Y total return
AUMI +6.1%
SIL +8.3%, better
Yield (12M)
AUMI 0.98%
SIL 1.43%, better
Holdings
AUMI 34
SIL 41
Avg volume (30D)
AUMI 2.4K sh
SIL 1.04M sh, better
NAV per share
AUMI $81.97
SIL $71.20
52W range

ETF.net Grade

AUMI: Cost 94, Risk 48, Mission 76, Tradability 15, Holdings 78, Durability 22. SIL: Cost 26, Risk 45, Mission not scored, Tradability 80, Holdings 32, Durability 83.
Pillar letters and Scores for AUMI, SIL, with each pillar’s weight
PillarAUMISIL
Cost30% weightA94HigherD26
Mission25% weightA76Not scored
Risk15% weightC48HigherC45
Tradability15% weightF15A80Higher
Holdings10% weightA78HigherD32
Durability5% weightF22A83Higher

Rank among Precious Metals Miners funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. AUMI and SIL are both graded against the same 18 Precious Metals Miners funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Precious Metals Miners⁠

Category · 18 funds
See all 18 ›

AUMI ranks 5th and SIL 11th of 18 funds in the Precious Metals Miners Category.

  1. Rank 5BAGMIThemes Silver Miners ETFScore 62
  2. Rank 5BAUMIThemes Gold Miners ETFScore 62
  3. Rank 7BAUAUGlobal X Gold Miners ETFScore 61
  4. Rank 11CGDMNWisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy FundScore 45
  5. Rank 11CSILGlobal X Silver Miners ETFScore 45
  6. Rank 13CSILJAmplify Junior Silver Miners ETFScore 42

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

AUMIBThemes Gold Miners ETF

SILCGlobal X Silver Miners ETF

In short

AUMI Gold miners with the blends stripped out. AUMI tracks an index of roughly 30 large miners that must earn at least 90% of revenue from gold, and it charges less than the typical fund in its group.

SIL The original US silver-miner ETF, listed since 2010 and still the big, liquid name in a small aisle: about 40 global companies that mine, refine and explore for silver, rather than the metal in a vault.

Stated mandate

AUMI The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, an index of companies active in the gold mining industry. It uses a passive/indexing approach to pursue that objective.

SIL The fund seeks to track the performance of the Solactive Global Silver Miners Total Return Index before fees and expenses, focusing on companies economically tied to silver mining.

Why people hold it

  • AUMI The "pure" in the index name is a rule: members must generate at least 90% of revenue from gold mining, so copper-and-gold conglomerates and diversified diggers stay out.solactive.comthemesetfs.com
  • A 0.35% fee undercuts the peer-group median and the category's household names, VanEck's GDX (0.51%) and iShares' RING (0.39%).
  • Roughly 30 names, free-float weighted, rebuilt on a set schedule: a concentrated, rules-based way to own the diggers rather than the metal.solactive.com
  • SIL The genre's originator, trading since 2010, now a multi-billion-dollar fund that changes hands actively, so getting in and out rarely takes gymnastics.globalxetfs.com
  • Miners, not metal: roughly 40 global companies engaged in silver mining, refining or exploration, so production and cost discipline matter alongside the silver price.globalxetfs.com
  • Rules-based and readable: it tracks the Solactive Global Silver Miners Total Return Index, so the lineup follows published index rules, not a manager's hunches.globalxetfs.com

Worth knowing

  • AUMI Thinly traded and small next to the group's giants, so bid-ask spreads can be wider and big orders can push the price.
  • Concentrated by design and non-diversified: about 30 miners, one commodity, plus mine-level risks like costs, permits and politics.themesetfs.com
  • Launched in December 2023, so the live track record is short, and cash comes back once or twice a year rather than monthly.
  • SIL It charges 0.65% a year, above the typical precious-metals miner fund. Newer rivals undercut it: SLVP at 0.39% and AGMI at 0.35%.
  • A global book, much of it listed outside the US, so currency swings and country-level mining rules ride along with the silver story.globalxetfs.com
  • Income is a side effect here: cash distributions land once or twice a year, not monthly.

Full AUMI profile⁠

Full SIL profile⁠

AUMI vs SIL Holdings

As of
How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

AUMI vs SIL Cost

Overpaying SIL vs AUMI

$5,591

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • AUMI 0.35%

    $7,126

  • SIL 0.65%

    $12,717

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • AUMI 0.35%
  • SIL 0.65%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530SIL $12,717AUMI $7,126

Year by year

YearAUMISILOverpaying
10$634$1,163$529
20$2,454$4,440$1,986
30$7,126$12,717$5,591

Expense ratio

  • 0.35%AUMI, cheaper
  • 0.65%SIL
  • Middle half of Precious Metals Miners funds
  • Median 0.52%

AUMI cheapest of 18 funds

SIL 12th cheapest of 18 funds

AUMI vs SIL Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
AUMI 0.98%
SIL 1.43%, better
Payout (12M)
AUMI $0.80
SIL $1.02
Last payment
AUMI $0.80
SIL $0.11
Ex-dividend
AUMI Dec 18, 2025
SIL Jun 29, 2026
Paid on
AUMI Dec 19, 2025
SIL Jul 7, 2026
Frequency
AUMI Irregular
SIL Twice a year

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

AUMIIrregular · 2 paymentsAll AUMI payments⁠
One bar per payment. 2 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 24, 2024 $0.65; Dec 18, 2025 $0.80. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12017202020232026YTD
SILTwice a year · 17 paymentsAll SIL payments⁠
One bar per payment. 17 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 28, 2017 $0.0065; Dec 28, 2018 $0.30; Jun 27, 2019 $0.10; Dec 30, 2019 $0.41; Jun 29, 2020 $0.14; Dec 30, 2020 $0.73; Jun 29, 2021 $0.18; Dec 30, 2021 $0.41; Jun 29, 2022 $0.07; Dec 29, 2022 $0.06; Jun 29, 2023 $0.03; Dec 28, 2023 $0.14; Jun 27, 2024 $0.0055; Dec 30, 2024 $0.76; Jun 27, 2025 $0.08; Dec 30, 2025 $0.91; Jun 29, 2026 $0.11. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12017202020232026YTD

AUMI vs SIL Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
AUMI 43.7%since Jan 2024SIL 46.1%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
AUMI 1.01since Jan 2024SIL 0.95
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
AUMI −39.8%since Dec 2023SIL −47.9%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
AUMI 0.05SIL 1.06

AUMI and SIL in the news

Popular comparisons

  • AUMIBvsRINGB

    Themes Gold Miners ETF · iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SILCvsRINGB

    Global X Silver Miners ETF · iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • AUMIBvsSGDMB

    Themes Gold Miners ETF · Sprott Gold Miners ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.46%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SILCvsSGDMB

    Global X Silver Miners ETF · Sprott Gold Miners ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.46%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • AUMIBvsGDXB

    Themes Gold Miners ETF · VanEck Gold Miners ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.51%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SILCvsGDXB

    Global X Silver Miners ETF · VanEck Gold Miners ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.51%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.