AUMI ranks 5th and SIL 11th of 18 funds in the Precious Metals Miners Category.
AUMI vs SIL
AUMI −0.30pt a year
0.35%0.65%
SIL 434.9×the volume
2.4K1.04M
AUMI vs SIL Performance
+6.1%+8.3%
- AUMI 0.35%, better
- SIL 0.65%
- AUMI $19M
- SIL $3.68B
- AUMI +6.1%
- SIL +8.3%, better
- AUMI 0.98%
- SIL 1.43%, better
- AUMI 34
- SIL 41
- AUMI 2.4K sh
- SIL 1.04M sh, better
- AUMI $81.97
- SIL $71.20
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AUMI | SIL |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A94Higher | D26 |
| Mission | A76 | |
| Risk | C48Higher | C45 |
| Tradability | F15 | A80Higher |
| Holdings | A78Higher | D32 |
| Durability | F22 | A83Higher |
Rank among Precious Metals Miners funds
Same Category. AUMI and SIL are both graded against the same 18 Precious Metals Miners funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AUMIB
SILC
In short
AUMI Gold miners with the blends stripped out. AUMI tracks an index of roughly 30 large miners that must earn at least 90% of revenue from gold, and it charges less than the typical fund in its group.
SIL The original US silver-miner ETF, listed since 2010 and still the big, liquid name in a small aisle: about 40 global companies that mine, refine and explore for silver, rather than the metal in a vault.
Stated mandate
AUMI The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, an index of companies active in the gold mining industry. It uses a passive/indexing approach to pursue that objective.
SIL The fund seeks to track the performance of the Solactive Global Silver Miners Total Return Index before fees and expenses, focusing on companies economically tied to silver mining.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AUMI vs SIL Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AUMI vs SIL Cost
Overpaying SIL vs AUMI
$5,591
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AUMI 0.35%
$7,126
SIL 0.65%
$12,717
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AUMI | SIL | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $634 | $1,163 | $529 |
| 20 | $2,454 | $4,440 | $1,986 |
| 30 | $7,126 | $12,717 | $5,591 |
- 0.35%AUMI, cheaper
- 0.65%SIL
- Middle half of Precious Metals Miners funds
- Median 0.52%
AUMI cheapest of 18 funds
SIL 12th cheapest of 18 funds
AUMI vs SIL Dividends
- AUMI 0.98%
- SIL 1.43%, better
- AUMI $0.80
- SIL $1.02
- AUMI $0.80
- SIL $0.11
- AUMI Dec 18, 2025
- SIL Jun 29, 2026
- AUMI Dec 19, 2025
- SIL Jul 7, 2026
- AUMI Irregular
- SIL Twice a year
Distribution history
AUMI vs SIL Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AUMI 43.7%SIL 46.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- AUMI 1.01SIL 0.95
- Worst fall
- AUMI −39.8%SIL −47.9%
- Market sensitivity
- AUMI 0.05SIL 1.06
AUMI and SIL in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.35% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.46%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.46%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.51%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.51%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

