Skip to content

RING vs SIL

iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF

RINGBNasdaq

Global X Silver Miners ETF

SILCNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

RING −0.26pt a year

RING0.39%SIL0.65%

Avg volume · 30D

SIL 1.6×the volume

RING649KSIL1.04M

10Y return · a year

RING +6.8pt

RING+14.1%SIL+7.3%

RING vs SIL Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

+179.8%RING+94.7%SIL

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. RING +179.8%. SIL +94.7%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%300%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
RING 0.39%, better
SIL 0.65%
Fund size
RING $2.06B
SIL $3.68B
1Y total return
RING +10.3%, better
SIL +8.3%
Yield (12M)
RING 1.35%
SIL 1.43%, better
Holdings
RING 49
SIL 41
Avg volume (30D)
RING 649K sh
SIL 1.04M sh, better
NAV per share
RING $67.07
SIL $71.20
52W range

ETF.net Grade

RING: Cost 79, Risk 66, Mission not scored, Tradability 72, Holdings 22, Durability 81. SIL: Cost 26, Risk 45, Mission not scored, Tradability 80, Holdings 32, Durability 83.
Pillar letters and Scores for RING, SIL, with each pillar’s weight
PillarRINGSIL
Cost30% weightA79HigherD26
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightB66HigherC45
Tradability15% weightA72A80Higher
Holdings10% weightF22D32Higher
Durability5% weightA81A83Higher

Rank among Precious Metals Miners funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. RING and SIL are both graded against the same 18 Precious Metals Miners funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Precious Metals Miners⁠

Category · 18 funds
See all 18 ›

RING ranks 1st and SIL 11th of 18 funds in the Precious Metals Miners Category.

  1. Rank 1BRINGiShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETFScore 67
  2. Rank 2BSGDMSprott Gold Miners ETFScore 66
  3. Rank 11CGDMNWisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy FundScore 45
  4. Rank 11CSILGlobal X Silver Miners ETFScore 45
  5. Rank 13CSILJAmplify Junior Silver Miners ETFScore 42

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

RINGBiShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF

SILCGlobal X Silver Miners ETF

In short

RING The low-fee way to own the gold diggers. RING holds roughly 40 gold mining companies worldwide for 0.39% a year, undercutting most funds in its niche, and it has been running that playbook since 2012.

SIL The original US silver-miner ETF, listed since 2010 and still the big, liquid name in a small aisle: about 40 global companies that mine, refine and explore for silver, rather than the metal in a vault.

Stated mandate

RING The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the Solactive Global Gold Explorers & Developers Total Return Index. It invests at least 80% of total assets in securities of companies economically tied to gold exploration.

SIL The fund seeks to track the performance of the Solactive Global Silver Miners Total Return Index before fees and expenses, focusing on companies economically tied to silver mining.

Why people hold it

  • RING At 0.39% a year it charges less than the typical gold-miner fund, and less than VanEck's GDX and GDXJ, the category's best-known names.ishares.com
  • Pure play by design: the index targets companies primarily in the business of gold mining, so you get miners rather than a mixed metals-and-materials basket.ishares.com
  • The mandate is global, not US-only, so the portfolio can reach gold producers listed across developed and emerging markets.ishares.com
  • Live since 2012, a multi-billion-dollar fund that trades actively, and one of the strongest builds in its precious-metals miner peer group.
  • SIL The genre's originator, trading since 2010, now a multi-billion-dollar fund that changes hands actively, so getting in and out rarely takes gymnastics.globalxetfs.com
  • Miners, not metal: roughly 40 global companies engaged in silver mining, refining or exploration, so production and cost discipline matter alongside the silver price.globalxetfs.com
  • Rules-based and readable: it tracks the Solactive Global Silver Miners Total Return Index, so the lineup follows published index rules, not a manager's hunches.globalxetfs.com

Worth knowing

  • RING Roughly 40 stocks in a single industry. The largest miners carry real weight, so one company's bad quarter is felt across the fund.ishares.com
  • This is mining equity, not bullion. Alongside the gold price you take on company execution, mine geology, labor and country risk.ishares.com
  • Income is an afterthought here: distributions come once or twice a year, not monthly.
  • SIL It charges 0.65% a year, above the typical precious-metals miner fund. Newer rivals undercut it: SLVP at 0.39% and AGMI at 0.35%.
  • A global book, much of it listed outside the US, so currency swings and country-level mining rules ride along with the silver story.globalxetfs.com
  • Income is a side effect here: cash distributions land once or twice a year, not monthly.

Full RING profile⁠

Full SIL profile⁠

RING vs SIL Holdings

As of
How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

RING vs SIL Cost

Overpaying SIL vs RING

$4,819

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • RING 0.39%

    $7,898

  • SIL 0.65%

    $12,717

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • RING 0.39%
  • SIL 0.65%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530SIL $12,717RING $7,898

Year by year

YearRINGSILOverpaying
10$705$1,163$458
20$2,725$4,440$1,715
30$7,898$12,717$4,819

Expense ratio

  • 0.39%RING, cheaper
  • 0.65%SIL
  • Middle half of Precious Metals Miners funds
  • Median 0.52%

RING 4th cheapest of 18 funds

SIL 12th cheapest of 18 funds

RING vs SIL Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
RING 1.35%
SIL 1.43%, better
Payout (12M)
RING $0.90
SIL $1.02
Last payment
RING $0.53
SIL $0.11
Ex-dividend
RING Jun 15, 2026
SIL Jun 29, 2026
Paid on
RING Jun 18, 2026
SIL Jul 7, 2026
Frequency
RING Twice a year
SIL Twice a year

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

RINGTwice a year · 19 paymentsAll RING payments⁠
One bar per payment. 19 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Jun 20, 2017 $0.03; Dec 19, 2017 $0.05; Jun 19, 2018 $0.07; Dec 18, 2018 $0.04; Jun 17, 2019 $0.14; Dec 16, 2019 $0.05; Jun 15, 2020 $0.10; Dec 14, 2020 $0.14; Jun 10, 2021 $0.31; Dec 13, 2021 $0.33; Jun 9, 2022 $0.23; Dec 13, 2022 $0.28; Jun 7, 2023 $0.21; Dec 20, 2023 $0.28; Jun 11, 2024 $0.19; Dec 17, 2024 $0.22; Jun 16, 2025 $0.24; Dec 16, 2025 $0.38; Jun 15, 2026 $0.53. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12017202020232026YTD
SILTwice a year · 17 paymentsAll SIL payments⁠
One bar per payment. 17 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 28, 2017 $0.0065; Dec 28, 2018 $0.30; Jun 27, 2019 $0.10; Dec 30, 2019 $0.41; Jun 29, 2020 $0.14; Dec 30, 2020 $0.73; Jun 29, 2021 $0.18; Dec 30, 2021 $0.41; Jun 29, 2022 $0.07; Dec 29, 2022 $0.06; Jun 29, 2023 $0.03; Dec 28, 2023 $0.14; Jun 27, 2024 $0.0055; Dec 30, 2024 $0.76; Jun 27, 2025 $0.08; Dec 30, 2025 $0.91; Jun 29, 2026 $0.11. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12017202020232026YTD

RING vs SIL Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • RING
  • SIL
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: RING −47.9% · Sep 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−50%−40%−30%−20%−10%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
RING 42.3%, betterSIL 46.1%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
RING 1.01, betterSIL 0.95
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
RING −47.9%SIL −47.9%Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
RING 0.94SIL 1.06

RING and SIL in the news

Popular comparisons

  • RINGBvsSGDMB

    iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF · Sprott Gold Miners ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.46%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SILCvsSGDMB

    Global X Silver Miners ETF · Sprott Gold Miners ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.46%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RINGBvsGDXB

    iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF · VanEck Gold Miners ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.51%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SILCvsGDXB

    Global X Silver Miners ETF · VanEck Gold Miners ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.51%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RINGBvsSLVPB

    iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF · iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SILCvsSLVPB

    Global X Silver Miners ETF · iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.