RING ranks 1st and SIL 11th of 18 funds in the Precious Metals Miners Category.
RING vs SIL
RING −0.26pt a year
0.39%0.65%
SIL 1.6×the volume
649K1.04M
RING +6.8pt
+14.1%+7.3%
RING vs SIL Performance
+179.8%+94.7%
- RING 0.39%, better
- SIL 0.65%
- RING $2.06B
- SIL $3.68B
- RING +10.3%, better
- SIL +8.3%
- RING 1.35%
- SIL 1.43%, better
- RING 49
- SIL 41
- RING 649K sh
- SIL 1.04M sh, better
- RING $67.07
- SIL $71.20
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | RING | SIL |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A79Higher | D26 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B66Higher | C45 |
| Tradability | A72 | A80Higher |
| Holdings | F22 | D32Higher |
| Durability | A81 | A83Higher |
Rank among Precious Metals Miners funds
Same Category. RING and SIL are both graded against the same 18 Precious Metals Miners funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
RINGB
SILC
In short
RING The low-fee way to own the gold diggers. RING holds roughly 40 gold mining companies worldwide for 0.39% a year, undercutting most funds in its niche, and it has been running that playbook since 2012.
SIL The original US silver-miner ETF, listed since 2010 and still the big, liquid name in a small aisle: about 40 global companies that mine, refine and explore for silver, rather than the metal in a vault.
Stated mandate
RING The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the Solactive Global Gold Explorers & Developers Total Return Index. It invests at least 80% of total assets in securities of companies economically tied to gold exploration.
SIL The fund seeks to track the performance of the Solactive Global Silver Miners Total Return Index before fees and expenses, focusing on companies economically tied to silver mining.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
RING vs SIL Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
RING vs SIL Cost
Overpaying SIL vs RING
$4,819
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
RING 0.39%
$7,898
SIL 0.65%
$12,717
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | RING | SIL | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $705 | $1,163 | $458 |
| 20 | $2,725 | $4,440 | $1,715 |
| 30 | $7,898 | $12,717 | $4,819 |
- 0.39%RING, cheaper
- 0.65%SIL
- Middle half of Precious Metals Miners funds
- Median 0.52%
RING 4th cheapest of 18 funds
SIL 12th cheapest of 18 funds
RING vs SIL Dividends
- RING 1.35%
- SIL 1.43%, better
- RING $0.90
- SIL $1.02
- RING $0.53
- SIL $0.11
- RING Jun 15, 2026
- SIL Jun 29, 2026
- RING Jun 18, 2026
- SIL Jul 7, 2026
- RING Twice a year
- SIL Twice a year
Distribution history
RING vs SIL Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- RING
- SIL
Risk facts
- Volatility
- RING 42.3%, betterSIL 46.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- RING 1.01, betterSIL 0.95
- Worst fall
- RING −47.9%SIL −47.9%Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Market sensitivity
- RING 0.94SIL 1.06
RING and SIL in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.39% · 0.46%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.46%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.51%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.51%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.



