Skip to content

SGDM vs SIL

Sprott Gold Miners ETF

SGDMBNYSE Arca

Global X Silver Miners ETF

SILCNYSE Arca

Overlap

12.0%by weight

Expense ratio

SGDM −0.19pt a year

SGDM0.46%SIL0.65%

Avg volume · 30D

SIL 29.0×the volume

SGDM36.1KSIL1.04M

10Y return · a year

SGDM +5.0pt

SGDM+12.3%SIL+7.3%

SGDM vs SIL Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

+156.6%SGDM+94.7%SIL

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. SGDM +156.6%. SIL +94.7%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−50%0%50%200%250%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
SGDM 0.46%, better
SIL 0.65%
Fund size
SGDM $568M
SIL $3.68B
1Y total return
SGDM +12.4%, better
SIL +8.3%
Yield (12M)
SGDM 1.12%
SIL 1.43%, better
Holdings
SGDM 49
SIL 41
Avg volume (30D)
SGDM 36.1K sh
SIL 1.04M sh, better
NAV per share
SGDM $64.96
SIL $71.20
52W range

ETF.net Grade

SGDM: Cost 68, Risk 72, Mission 78, Tradability 56, Holdings 70, Durability 60. SIL: Cost 26, Risk 45, Mission not scored, Tradability 80, Holdings 32, Durability 83.
Pillar letters and Scores for SGDM, SIL, with each pillar’s weight
PillarSGDMSIL
Cost30% weightB68HigherD26
Mission25% weightA78Not scored
Risk15% weightA72HigherC45
Tradability15% weightB56A80Higher
Holdings10% weightA70HigherD32
Durability5% weightB60A83Higher

Rank among Precious Metals Miners funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. SGDM and SIL are both graded against the same 18 Precious Metals Miners funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Precious Metals Miners⁠

Category · 18 funds
See all 18 ›

SGDM ranks 2nd and SIL 11th of 18 funds in the Precious Metals Miners Category.

  1. Rank 1BRINGiShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETFScore 67
  2. Rank 2BSGDMSprott Gold Miners ETFScore 66
  3. Rank 3BGDXVanEck Gold Miners ETFScore 65
  4. Rank 11CGDMNWisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy FundScore 45
  5. Rank 11CSILGlobal X Silver Miners ETFScore 45
  6. Rank 13CSILJAmplify Junior Silver Miners ETFScore 42

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

SGDMBSprott Gold Miners ETF

SILCGlobal X Silver Miners ETF

In short

SGDM SGDM doesn't just rank gold miners by size. It tracks a custom-factors index of roughly 50 larger miners listed in Canada and the US, and charges 0.46%, under its peer group's median fee.

SIL The original US silver-miner ETF, listed since 2010 and still the big, liquid name in a small aisle: about 40 global companies that mine, refine and explore for silver, rather than the metal in a vault.

Stated mandate

SGDM The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the performance of the Solactive Gold Miners Custom Factors Index, which targets larger gold companies listed on Canadian and major U.S. exchanges.

SIL The fund seeks to track the performance of the Solactive Global Silver Miners Total Return Index before fees and expenses, focusing on companies economically tied to silver mining.

Why people hold it

  • SGDM Fee of 0.46% sits under the median for precious-metals miner funds, and under both GDX (0.51%) and GDXJ (0.52%).
  • Rules-based and named out loud: it follows the Solactive Gold Miners Custom Factors Index (SOLGMCFT), and it has stayed close to that stated mandate.
  • Running since 2014, a long life for a thematic fund, and it holds about 50 larger gold companies rather than a sprawling list.
  • Lands in the upper half of the gold and silver miner group in our review, with high confidence in the underlying data.
  • SIL The genre's originator, trading since 2010, now a multi-billion-dollar fund that changes hands actively, so getting in and out rarely takes gymnastics.globalxetfs.com
  • Miners, not metal: roughly 40 global companies engaged in silver mining, refining or exploration, so production and cost discipline matter alongside the silver price.globalxetfs.com
  • Rules-based and readable: it tracks the Solactive Global Silver Miners Total Return Index, so the lineup follows published index rules, not a manager's hunches.globalxetfs.com

Worth knowing

  • SGDM Thinly traded next to the category's giants, so spreads can be wider and larger orders can push the price around.
  • The index sticks to Canadian and major US listings, so gold miners quoted only on other exchanges sit outside the portfolio.
  • One industry, driven by the gold price and how well mines actually run, so the ride is bumpier than a broad stock fund.
  • SIL It charges 0.65% a year, above the typical precious-metals miner fund. Newer rivals undercut it: SLVP at 0.39% and AGMI at 0.35%.
  • A global book, much of it listed outside the US, so currency swings and country-level mining rules ride along with the silver story.globalxetfs.com
  • Income is a side effect here: cash distributions land once or twice a year, not monthly.

Full SGDM profile⁠

Full SIL profile⁠

SGDM vs SIL Holdings

As of

How SGDM and SIL differ

Overlap by weight

12.0%

Shared holdings make up 22.3% of SIL and 13.5% of SGDM.

Level by level

  • Holdings7 in both12.0%
  • Countryby domicile78.8%
  • Asset classEquity100%
  • Sector2 Sectors99.9%

Sector

Sector weights in SGDM and SIL, widest gap first
SectorMore in SGDMMore in SIL
MaterialsSGDM +0.1 points
Consumer StaplesSIL +0.1 points

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in SGDM and SIL, widest gap first
CountryMore in SGDMMore in SIL
CanadaSGDM +15.6 points
MexicoSIL +8.6 points
United StatesSIL +5.7 points
South AfricaSGDM +3.7 points
PeruSIL +3.7 points
South KoreaSIL +2.2 points
United KingdomSGDM +2.0 points
AustraliaSIL +1.0 points
SwedenSIL +0.1 points

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • SGDM55.8%
  • SIL76.3%

Securities held

  • SGDM48
  • SIL39

Asset class

SGDM
Equity
SIL
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in SGDM41
  • In both7
  • Only in SIL32

Only in SGDM

41 securities, 86.3% of SGDM by weight

  • Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd.9.87%
  • Newmont Corp.7.91%
  • Barrick Mining Corp.7.79%

Only in SIL

32 securities, 77.7% of SIL by weight

  • Wheaton Precious Metals Corp24.20%
  • Pan American Silver Corp11.36%
  • Industrias Penoles Sab De Cv4.96%

Weight gaps

All 7 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in SGDM and SIL, widest gap first
HoldingMore in SGDMMore in SIL
Coeur Mining Inc.CDESIL +7.24 points
Triple Flag Precious Metals Corp.SGDM +1.41 points
OR Royalties Inc.SIL +1.26 points
Discovery Mining Ltd.SIL +0.83 points
McEwen Inc.MUXSIL +0.51 points
Hycroft Mining Holding Corp.HYMCSIL +0.42 points
Fortuna Mining Corp.SGDM +0.08 points

All 48 SGDM holdings⁠All 42 SIL holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

SGDM vs SIL Cost

Overpaying SIL vs SGDM

$3,487

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • SGDM 0.46%

    $9,230

  • SIL 0.65%

    $12,717

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • SGDM 0.46%
  • SIL 0.65%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530SIL $12,717SGDM $9,230

Year by year

YearSGDMSILOverpaying
10$830$1,163$333
20$3,195$4,440$1,245
30$9,230$12,717$3,487

Expense ratio

  • 0.46%SGDM, cheaper
  • 0.65%SIL
  • Middle half of Precious Metals Miners funds
  • Median 0.52%

SGDM 7th cheapest of 18 funds

SIL 12th cheapest of 18 funds

SGDM vs SIL Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
SGDM 1.12%
SIL 1.43%, better
Payout (12M)
SGDM $0.73
SIL $1.02
Last payment
SGDM $0.73
SIL $0.11
Ex-dividend
SGDM Dec 18, 2025
SIL Jun 29, 2026
Paid on
SGDM Dec 22, 2025
SIL Jul 7, 2026
Frequency
SGDM Annual
SIL Twice a year

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

SGDMAnnual · 9 paymentsAll SGDM payments⁠
One bar per payment. 9 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 21, 2017 $0.12; Dec 20, 2018 $0.09; Dec 19, 2019 $0.06; Dec 16, 2020 $0.09; Dec 15, 2021 $0.36; Dec 15, 2022 $0.35; Dec 14, 2023 $0.35; Dec 12, 2024 $0.29; Dec 18, 2025 $0.73. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12017202020232026YTD
SILTwice a year · 17 paymentsAll SIL payments⁠
One bar per payment. 17 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 28, 2017 $0.0065; Dec 28, 2018 $0.30; Jun 27, 2019 $0.10; Dec 30, 2019 $0.41; Jun 29, 2020 $0.14; Dec 30, 2020 $0.73; Jun 29, 2021 $0.18; Dec 30, 2021 $0.41; Jun 29, 2022 $0.07; Dec 29, 2022 $0.06; Jun 29, 2023 $0.03; Dec 28, 2023 $0.14; Jun 27, 2024 $0.0055; Dec 30, 2024 $0.76; Jun 27, 2025 $0.08; Dec 30, 2025 $0.91; Jun 29, 2026 $0.11. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12017202020232026YTD

SGDM vs SIL Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • SGDM
  • SIL
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: SIL −47.9% · Sep 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−40%−30%−20%−10%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
SGDM 40.0%, betterSIL 46.1%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
SGDM 0.97, betterSIL 0.95
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
SGDM −45.0%, betterSIL −47.9%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
SGDM 0.71SIL 1.06

SGDM and SIL in the news

Popular comparisons

  • SGDMBvsRINGB

    Sprott Gold Miners ETF · iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.46% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SILCvsRINGB

    Global X Silver Miners ETF · iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SGDMBvsGDXB

    Sprott Gold Miners ETF · VanEck Gold Miners ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.46% · 0.51%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SILCvsGDXB

    Global X Silver Miners ETF · VanEck Gold Miners ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.51%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SGDMBvsSLVPB

    Sprott Gold Miners ETF · iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.46% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SILCvsSLVPB

    Global X Silver Miners ETF · iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.