QLVE ranks 7th and GEM 9th of 20 funds in the Emerging Markets Multifactor Category.
GEM vs QLVE
QLVE −0.17pt a year
0.35%0.18%
GEM 307.3×the volume
124K404
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
+7.0%+7.0%
GEM vs QLVE Performance
+40.2%+40.2%
- GEM 0.35%
- QLVE 0.18%, better
- GEM $1.68B
- QLVE $16M
- GEM +13.2%, better
- QLVE +11.2%
- GEM 2.06%
- QLVE 3.17%, better
- GEM 734
- QLVE 155
- GEM 124K sh, better
- QLVE 404 sh
- GEM $47.78
- QLVE $32.48
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GEM | QLVE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B68 | A100Higher |
| Mission | A93 | |
| Risk | C41 | B66Higher |
| Tradability | C52Higher | F11 |
| Holdings | D37Higher | D32 |
| Durability | A76Higher | D33 |
Rank among Emerging Markets Multifactor funds
Same Category. GEM and QLVE are both graded against the same 20 Emerging Markets Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GEMB
QLVEB
In short
GEM Goldman's 2015 ETF debut class included this one: emerging markets screened through four factors (value, momentum, quality, low volatility) across roughly 700 names for 0.35% a year. A full-market map with tilts, not a concentrated bet.
QLVE Most emerging-markets factor funds chase value. QLVE goes the other way: cut the weakest fifth on quality, then optimize what is left toward lower volatility. Cost is 0.18% net of a waiver through March 1, 2027.
Stated mandate
GEM The Fund seeks to closely track, before fees and expenses, the Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta® Emerging Markets Equity Index, which provides exposure to equity securities of emerging-market issuers.
QLVE The Fund is designed for investors seeking emerging-markets exposure with an emphasis on quality and low volatility. It seeks to match, before fees and expenses, the performance of the Northern Trust Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GEM vs QLVE Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GEM vs QLVE Cost
Overpaying GEM vs QLVE
$3,377
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GEM 0.35%
$7,126
QLVE 0.18%
$3,749
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GEM | QLVE | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $634 | $328 | $306 |
| 20 | $2,454 | $1,281 | $1,173 |
| 30 | $7,126 | $3,749 | $3,377 |
- 0.35%GEM
- 0.18%QLVE, cheaper
- Middle half of Emerging Markets Multifactor funds
- Median 0.44%
QLVE cheapest of 20 funds
GEM 6th cheapest of 20 funds
GEM vs QLVE Dividends
- GEM 2.06%
- QLVE 3.17%, better
- GEM $0.96
- QLVE $1.02
- GEM $0.96
- QLVE $0.34
- GEM Dec 23, 2025
- QLVE Sep 18, 2026
- GEM Dec 30, 2025
- QLVE Sep 24, 2026
- GEM Annual
- QLVE Quarterly
Distribution history
GEM vs QLVE Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- GEM
- QLVE
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GEM 15.6%QLVE 11.0%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- GEM 1.02QLVE 1.11, better
- Worst fall
- GEM −31.4%QLVE −23.6%, better
- Market sensitivity
- GEM 1.10QLVE 0.83
Popular comparisons
- 0.35% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.36%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.36%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.