PEJ ranks 2nd and GENZ 4th of 10 funds in the Consumer Lifestyle Category.
GENZ vs PEJ
GENZ −0.07pt a year
0.51%0.58%
PEJ 44.4×the volume
1.38K61.3K
PEJ +4.5pt
+2.3%+6.8%
GENZ vs PEJ Performance
−21.7%+34.6%
- GENZ 0.51%, better
- PEJ 0.58%
- GENZ $15M
- PEJ $358M
- GENZ −10.3%
- PEJ +14.2%, better
- GENZ 3.83%, better
- PEJ 0.51%
- GENZ 42
- PEJ 32
- GENZ 1.38K sh
- PEJ 61.3K sh, better
- GENZ $35.62
- PEJ $66.44
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GENZ | PEJ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B55Higher | C46 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | D26 | B66Higher |
| Tradability | D39 | A86Higher |
| Holdings | D38 | B69Higher |
| Durability | A70 | A90Higher |
Rank among Consumer Lifestyle funds
Same Category. GENZ and PEJ are both graded against the same 10 Consumer Lifestyle funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GENZC
PEJB
In short
GENZ Longevity is rare in thematics: GENZ dates back to 2008 and today tracks the MarketVector Digital Native Economy Index, roughly 40 US stocks, for 0.51% a year, below its peer group's median fee.
PEJ The travel-and-fun trade, run like a quant screen: roughly 30 US leisure and entertainment stocks re-ranked every quarter on momentum, quality, management action and value. Fee is 0.58%, with no waiver doing the work. Trading since 2005.
Stated mandate
GENZ GENZ seeks to replicate the MarketVector Digital Native Economy Index before fees and expenses. It uses a passive approach and normally invests at least 80% of assets in securities comprising that index.
PEJ The fund seeks capital appreciation through an index that evaluates companies using multiple investment-merit criteria.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GENZ vs PEJ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GENZ vs PEJ Cost
Overpaying PEJ vs GENZ
$1,288
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GENZ 0.51%
$10,165
PEJ 0.58%
$11,453
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GENZ | PEJ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $918 | $1,041 | $123 |
| 20 | $3,527 | $3,986 | $459 |
| 30 | $10,165 | $11,453 | $1,288 |
- 0.51%GENZ, cheaper
- 0.58%PEJ
- Middle half of Consumer Lifestyle funds
- Median 0.54%
GENZ 5th cheapest of 10 funds
PEJ 6th cheapest of 10 funds
GENZ vs PEJ Dividends
- GENZ 3.83%, better
- PEJ 0.51%
- GENZ $1.36
- PEJ $0.34
- GENZ $1.36
- PEJ $0.06
- GENZ Dec 22, 2025
- PEJ Sep 21, 2026
- GENZ Dec 26, 2025
- PEJ Sep 25, 2026
- GENZ Annual
- PEJ Quarterly
Distribution history
GENZ vs PEJ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- GENZ
- PEJ
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GENZ 18.2%PEJ 16.9%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- GENZ −0.12PEJ 1.08, better
- Worst fall
- GENZ −36.8%PEJ −34.7%, better
- Market sensitivity
- GENZ 0.96PEJ 1.10
Popular comparisons
- 0.51% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.58% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.51% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.58% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.51% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.58% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.