Skip to content

GGRW vs KOMP

Gabelli Growth Innovators ETF

GGRWDNYSE Arca

State Street SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF

KOMPANYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

KOMP −0.70pt a year

GGRW0.90%KOMP0.20%

Avg volume · 30D

KOMP 198.1×the volume

GGRW348KOMP68.9K

5Y return · a year

GGRW +5.0pt

GGRW+4.6%KOMP−0.4%

GGRW vs KOMP Performance

Nov 9, 2021 – Nov 9, 2026

+25.3%GGRW−1.9%KOMP

Nov 9, 2021 to Nov 9, 2026. GGRW +25.3%. KOMP −1.9%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−40%−20%Nov 2021May 2024Nov 2026
Expense ratio
GGRW 0.90%
KOMP 0.20%, better
Fund size
GGRW $8M
KOMP $2.39B
1Y total return
GGRW +2.4%, better
KOMP +1.6%
Yield (12M)
GGRW No data
KOMP 1.63%
Holdings
GGRW 42
KOMP 501
Avg volume (30D)
GGRW 348 sh
KOMP 68.9K sh, better
NAV per share
GGRW $34.85
KOMP $60.11
52W range

ETF.net Grade

GGRW: Cost 0, Risk 73, Mission 81, Tradability 33, Holdings 48, Durability 20. KOMP: Cost 100, Risk 58, Mission not scored, Tradability 78, Holdings 89, Durability 89.
Pillar letters and Scores for GGRW, KOMP, with each pillar’s weight
PillarGGRWKOMP
Cost30% weightF0A100Higher
Mission25% weightA81Not scored
Risk15% weightA73HigherB58
Tradability15% weightD33A78Higher
Holdings10% weightC48A89Higher
Durability5% weightF20A89Higher

Rank among Disruptive Innovation funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. GGRW and KOMP are both graded against the same 30 Disruptive Innovation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Disruptive Innovation⁠

Category · 30 funds
See all 30 ›

KOMP ranks 2nd and GGRW 29th of 30 funds in the Disruptive Innovation Category.

  1. Rank 1AXTiShares Future Exponential Technologies ETFScore 85
  2. Rank 2AKOMPState Street SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETFScore 84
  3. Rank 3ATRFMAAM Transformers ETFScore 74
  4. Rank 28DSPRXSpear Alpha ETFScore 31
  5. Rank 29DGGRWGabelli Growth Innovators ETFScore 28
  6. Rank 30DMINVMatthews Asia Innovators Active ETFScore 27

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

GGRWDGabelli Growth Innovators ETF

KOMPAState Street SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF

In short

GGRW A rare bird in innovation land: Gabelli's value instincts aimed at the digital economy, wrapped in a non-transparent ETF that keeps its stock picks off the daily tape. Real choices, where most peers in the theme just track an index.

KOMP Most thematic funds bet on one idea. KOMP buys the whole Fourth Industrial Revolution: 20-plus Kensho subsectors, from robotics to genetic engineering, spread across roughly 500 global stocks for 0.20% a year.

Stated mandate

GGRW The Fund seeks capital appreciation by investing primarily in common stocks relevant to innovation, defined as new technologies, products, or services that change how businesses operate. It targets companies whose earnings-growth prospects are undervalued.

KOMP The Fund seeks investment results that generally correspond, before fees and expenses, to the total return performance of the S&P Kensho New Economies Composite Index.

Why people hold it

  • GGRW Actual stock picking, not index following: the mandate targets innovation companies whose earnings-growth prospects the manager judges undervalued. A value shop's take on growth.gabelli.com
  • Built on the ActiveShares model: no daily holdings file, just a verified intraday value (VIIV) published every second, which keeps other traders from shadowing the manager's moves.gabelli.com
  • Does what the label says. The portfolio has stayed tight to its stated innovation mandate, with a risk profile on the calmer end of a famously jumpy category.
  • KOMP 0.20% a year, under a third of the typical disruptive-innovation fund's fee and below peers like XT (0.46%) and TRFM (0.49%).
  • Kensho's language-processing engine scans regulatory filings for context and keywords, so membership rests on what a company discloses it does, not an old sector label.ssga.comspglobal.com
  • About 500 global names across 20-plus subsectors, equal weighted within each group with extra weight to 'core' operators. One mega-cap can't run the show.spglobal.com
  • Trading since 2018 and now a multi-billion-dollar fund, it sits among the strongest implementations in the disruptive-innovation group.

Worth knowing

  • GGRW The active, hidden-book approach carries an active price tag: 0.90% a year, above the typical innovation fund, while index-based peers like KOMP (0.20%) charge a sliver of that.
  • The prospectus names the trade-off of secrecy: shares may trade at wider bid/ask spreads than ETFs that publish holdings daily, especially in volatile markets.gabelli.com
  • A small, thinly traded fund, so the cost of getting in and out runs higher than in the category's household names.
  • KOMP Equal weighting reaches down into smaller, earlier-stage innovators, so swings run wider than a plain broad-market index fund.spglobal.com
  • Subsector weights follow a risk-adjusted-return formula with annual reconstitution, so the mix drifts toward industries that have recently performed well.ssga.comspglobal.com
  • Breadth cuts both ways: a pure play on one theme like AI or space gets diluted here across the entire innovation map.spglobal.com

Full GGRW profile⁠

Full KOMP profile⁠

GGRW vs KOMP Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

GGRW vs KOMP Cost

Overpaying GGRW vs KOMP

$12,885

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • GGRW 0.90%

    $17,040

  • KOMP 0.20%

    $4,155

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • GGRW 0.90%
  • KOMP 0.20%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530GGRW $17,040KOMP $4,155

Year by year

YearGGRWKOMPOverpaying
10$1,593$365$1,228
20$6,015$1,421$4,594
30$17,040$4,155$12,885

Expense ratio

  • 0.90%GGRW
  • 0.20%KOMP, cheaper
  • Middle half of Disruptive Innovation funds
  • Median 0.65%

KOMP cheapest of 30 funds

GGRW 30th cheapest of 30 funds

GGRW vs KOMP Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 9, 2026
Yield (12M)
GGRW No data
KOMP 1.63%
Payout (12M)
GGRW No data
KOMP $1.02
Last payment
GGRW $0.15
KOMP $0.13
Ex-dividend
GGRW Dec 29, 2025
KOMP Sep 21, 2026
Paid on
GGRW Jan 9, 2026
KOMP Sep 23, 2026
Frequency
GGRW Irregular
KOMP Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2018 to 2026, same scale for both

GGRWIrregular · 1 paymentAll GGRW payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment from 2018 to 2026 YTD. Dec 29, 2025 $0.15. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.50202020232026YTD
KOMPQuarterly · 33 paymentsAll KOMP payments⁠
One bar per payment. 33 payments from 2018 to 2026 YTD. Dec 24, 2018 $0.04; Mar 18, 2019 $0.05; Jun 24, 2019 $0.03; Sep 23, 2019 $0.05; Dec 23, 2019 $0.11; Dec 30, 2019 $0.05; Mar 23, 2020 $0.06; Jun 22, 2020 $0.06; Sep 21, 2020 $0.07; Dec 21, 2020 $0.20; Mar 22, 2021 $0.22; Jun 21, 2021 $0.14; Sep 20, 2021 $0.13; Dec 20, 2021 $0.36; Mar 21, 2022 $0.08; Jun 21, 2022 $0.17; Sep 19, 2022 $0.17; Dec 19, 2022 $0.15; Mar 20, 2023 $0.10; Jun 20, 2023 $0.15; Sep 18, 2023 $0.12; Dec 18, 2023 $0.22; Mar 18, 2024 $0.08; Jun 24, 2024 $0.16; Sep 23, 2024 $0.10; Dec 23, 2024 $0.19; Mar 24, 2025 $0.12; Jun 23, 2025 $0.12; Sep 22, 2025 $0.14; Dec 22, 2025 $0.72; Mar 23, 2026 $0.07; Jun 22, 2026 $0.10; Sep 21, 2026 $0.13. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.50202020232026YTD

GGRW vs KOMP Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • GGRW
  • KOMP
Nov 9, 2021 to Nov 9, 2026. Worst fall: GGRW −50.3% · Nov 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−40%−30%−20%−10%0%Nov 2021May 2024Nov 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
GGRW 16.7%, betterKOMP 22.3%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
GGRW 1.17, betterKOMP 0.76
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
GGRW −50.3%KOMP −45.0%, better
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
GGRW 1.08KOMP 1.65

GGRW and KOMP in the news

Popular comparisons

  • GGRWDvsXTA

    Gabelli Growth Innovators ETF · iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.90% · 0.46%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • KOMPAvsARKKC

    State Street SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF · ARK Innovation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.20% · 0.75%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GGRWDvsTRFMA

    Gabelli Growth Innovators ETF · AAM Transformers ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.90% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • KOMPAvsXTA

    State Street SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF · iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.20% · 0.46%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GGRWDvsXITKA

    Gabelli Growth Innovators ETF · State Street SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.90% · 0.45%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • KOMPAvsTRFMA

    State Street SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF · AAM Transformers ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.20% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.