KOMP ranks 2nd and GGRW 29th of 30 funds in the Disruptive Innovation Category.
GGRW vs KOMP
KOMP −0.70pt a year
0.90%0.20%
KOMP 198.1×the volume
34868.9K
GGRW +5.0pt
+4.6%−0.4%
GGRW vs KOMP Performance
+25.3%−1.9%
- GGRW 0.90%
- KOMP 0.20%, better
- GGRW $8M
- KOMP $2.39B
- GGRW +2.4%, better
- KOMP +1.6%
- GGRW
- KOMP 1.63%
- GGRW 42
- KOMP 501
- GGRW 348 sh
- KOMP 68.9K sh, better
- GGRW $34.85
- KOMP $60.11
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GGRW | KOMP |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F0 | A100Higher |
| Mission | A81 | |
| Risk | A73Higher | B58 |
| Tradability | D33 | A78Higher |
| Holdings | C48 | A89Higher |
| Durability | F20 | A89Higher |
Rank among Disruptive Innovation funds
Same Category. GGRW and KOMP are both graded against the same 30 Disruptive Innovation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GGRWD
KOMPA
In short
GGRW A rare bird in innovation land: Gabelli's value instincts aimed at the digital economy, wrapped in a non-transparent ETF that keeps its stock picks off the daily tape. Real choices, where most peers in the theme just track an index.
KOMP Most thematic funds bet on one idea. KOMP buys the whole Fourth Industrial Revolution: 20-plus Kensho subsectors, from robotics to genetic engineering, spread across roughly 500 global stocks for 0.20% a year.
Stated mandate
GGRW The Fund seeks capital appreciation by investing primarily in common stocks relevant to innovation, defined as new technologies, products, or services that change how businesses operate. It targets companies whose earnings-growth prospects are undervalued.
KOMP The Fund seeks investment results that generally correspond, before fees and expenses, to the total return performance of the S&P Kensho New Economies Composite Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GGRW vs KOMP Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GGRW vs KOMP Cost
Overpaying GGRW vs KOMP
$12,885
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GGRW 0.90%
$17,040
KOMP 0.20%
$4,155
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GGRW | KOMP | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,593 | $365 | $1,228 |
| 20 | $6,015 | $1,421 | $4,594 |
| 30 | $17,040 | $4,155 | $12,885 |
- 0.90%GGRW
- 0.20%KOMP, cheaper
- Middle half of Disruptive Innovation funds
- Median 0.65%
KOMP cheapest of 30 funds
GGRW 30th cheapest of 30 funds
GGRW vs KOMP Dividends
- GGRW
- KOMP 1.63%
- GGRW
- KOMP $1.02
- GGRW $0.15
- KOMP $0.13
- GGRW Dec 29, 2025
- KOMP Sep 21, 2026
- GGRW Jan 9, 2026
- KOMP Sep 23, 2026
- GGRW Irregular
- KOMP Quarterly
Distribution history
GGRW vs KOMP Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- GGRW
- KOMP
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GGRW 16.7%, betterKOMP 22.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- GGRW 1.17, betterKOMP 0.76
- Worst fall
- GGRW −50.3%KOMP −45.0%, better
- Market sensitivity
- GGRW 1.08KOMP 1.65
GGRW and KOMP in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.90% · 0.46%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.90% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.46%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.90% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

