Skip to content

GGRW vs XT

Gabelli Growth Innovators ETF

GGRWDNYSE Arca

iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF

XTANasdaq

Overlap

Expense ratio

XT −0.44pt a year

GGRW0.90%XT0.46%

Avg volume · 30D

XT 196.9×the volume

GGRW348XT68.5K

5Y return · a year

XT +1.9pt

GGRW+4.6%XT+6.5%

GGRW vs XT Performance

Nov 9, 2021 – Nov 9, 2026

+25.3%GGRW+36.8%XT

Nov 9, 2021 to Nov 9, 2026. GGRW +25.3%. XT +36.8%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−40%−20%0%Nov 2021May 2024Nov 2026
Expense ratio
GGRW 0.90%
XT 0.46%, better
Fund size
GGRW $8M
XT $3.81B
1Y total return
GGRW +2.4%
XT +21.6%, better
Yield (12M)
GGRW No data
XT 6.88%
Holdings
GGRW 42
XT 216
Avg volume (30D)
GGRW 348 sh
XT 68.5K sh, better
NAV per share
GGRW $34.85
XT $79.88
52W range

ETF.net Grade

GGRW: Cost 0, Risk 73, Mission 81, Tradability 33, Holdings 48, Durability 20. XT: Cost 95, Risk 85, Mission not scored, Tradability 77, Holdings 67, Durability 97.
Pillar letters and Scores for GGRW, XT, with each pillar’s weight
PillarGGRWXT
Cost30% weightF0A95Higher
Mission25% weightA81Not scored
Risk15% weightA73A85Higher
Tradability15% weightD33A77Higher
Holdings10% weightC48B67Higher
Durability5% weightF20A97Higher

Rank among Disruptive Innovation funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. GGRW and XT are both graded against the same 30 Disruptive Innovation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Disruptive Innovation⁠

Category · 30 funds
See all 30 ›

XT ranks 1st and GGRW 29th of 30 funds in the Disruptive Innovation Category.

  1. Rank 1AXTiShares Future Exponential Technologies ETFScore 85
  2. Rank 2AKOMPState Street SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETFScore 84
  3. Rank 28DSPRXSpear Alpha ETFScore 31
  4. Rank 29DGGRWGabelli Growth Innovators ETFScore 28
  5. Rank 30DMINVMatthews Asia Innovators Active ETFScore 27

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

GGRWDGabelli Growth Innovators ETF

XTAiShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF

In short

GGRW A rare bird in innovation land: Gabelli's value instincts aimed at the digital economy, wrapped in a non-transparent ETF that keeps its stock picks off the daily tape. Real choices, where most peers in the theme just track an index.

XT Innovation, spread thin on purpose. XT holds roughly 200 global companies scored by Morningstar analysts for exposure to a handful of exponential tech themes, so no single moonshot carries the fund.

Stated mandate

GGRW The Fund seeks capital appreciation by investing primarily in common stocks relevant to innovation, defined as new technologies, products, or services that change how businesses operate. It targets companies whose earnings-growth prospects are undervalued.

XT XT seeks to track an index of stocks from developed and emerging markets whose companies create or use exponential technologies. The strategy targets technologies with potential economic benefits, including the ability to displace older technologies or create new markets.

Why people hold it

  • GGRW Actual stock picking, not index following: the mandate targets innovation companies whose earnings-growth prospects the manager judges undervalued. A value shop's take on growth.gabelli.com
  • Built on the ActiveShares model: no daily holdings file, just a verified intraday value (VIIV) published every second, which keeps other traders from shadowing the manager's moves.gabelli.com
  • Does what the label says. The portfolio has stayed tight to its stated innovation mandate, with a risk profile on the calmer end of a famously jumpy category.
  • XT Cheap for the theme at 0.46% a year, below the typical fee in its disruptive-innovation cohort and under peers like TRFM and FDTX.
  • Human fingerprint on the stock list: Morningstar equity analysts score companies on theme exposure instead of sorting by keywords or revenue tags.sec.govcontentstack.io
  • Global by construction (developed and emerging markets) and not fenced into the tech sector, so a drugmaker or an industrial can qualify on theme exposure.sec.gov
  • Launched in 2015 and now a multi-billion-dollar iShares fund, it stands among the stronger builds in its innovation peer group.ishares.com

Worth knowing

  • GGRW The active, hidden-book approach carries an active price tag: 0.90% a year, above the typical innovation fund, while index-based peers like KOMP (0.20%) charge a sliver of that.
  • The prospectus names the trade-off of secrecy: shares may trade at wider bid/ask spreads than ETFs that publish holdings daily, especially in volatile markets.gabelli.com
  • A small, thinly traded fund, so the cost of getting in and out runs higher than in the category's household names.
  • XT The index has been reworked since launch (weighting scheme, theme list), and themes get an annual review, so today's tilt is not fixed forever.morningstar.comsec.gov
  • Moderately traded rather than a household name, which can mean wider spreads than the biggest tech ETFs.
  • About 200 positions dilutes any single breakout winner, and distributions land only once or twice a year.

Full GGRW profile⁠

Full XT profile⁠

GGRW vs XT Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

GGRW vs XT Cost

Overpaying GGRW vs XT

$7,810

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • GGRW 0.90%

    $17,040

  • XT 0.46%

    $9,230

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • GGRW 0.90%
  • XT 0.46%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530GGRW $17,040XT $9,230

Year by year

YearGGRWXTOverpaying
10$1,593$830$763
20$6,015$3,195$2,820
30$17,040$9,230$7,810

Expense ratio

  • 0.90%GGRW
  • 0.46%XT, cheaper
  • Middle half of Disruptive Innovation funds
  • Median 0.65%

XT 3rd cheapest of 30 funds

GGRW 30th cheapest of 30 funds

GGRW vs XT Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 9, 2026
Yield (12M)
GGRW No data
XT 6.88%
Payout (12M)
GGRW No data
XT $5.69
Last payment
GGRW $0.15
XT $0.36
Ex-dividend
GGRW Dec 29, 2025
XT Jun 15, 2026
Paid on
GGRW Jan 9, 2026
XT Jun 18, 2026
Frequency
GGRW Irregular
XT Twice a year

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

GGRWIrregular · 1 paymentAll GGRW payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 29, 2025 $0.15. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$52017202020232026YTD
XTTwice a year · 23 paymentsAll XT payments⁠
One bar per payment. 23 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Jun 20, 2017 $0.24; Dec 21, 2017 $0.10; Dec 28, 2017 $0.0072; Jun 19, 2018 $0.29; Dec 18, 2018 $0.18; Dec 28, 2018 $0.02; Jun 17, 2019 $0.36; Dec 16, 2019 $0.30; Jun 15, 2020 $0.24; Dec 14, 2020 $0.19; Dec 30, 2020 $0.01; Jun 10, 2021 $0.27; Dec 13, 2021 $0.28; Jun 9, 2022 $0.22; Dec 13, 2022 $0.15; Jun 7, 2023 $0.14; Dec 20, 2023 $0.11; Jun 11, 2024 $0.16; Dec 17, 2024 $0.22; Dec 30, 2024 $0.0094; Jun 16, 2025 $0.21; Dec 16, 2025 $5.33; Jun 15, 2026 $0.36. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$52017202020232026YTD

GGRW vs XT Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • GGRW
  • XT
Nov 9, 2021 to Nov 9, 2026. Worst fall: GGRW −50.3% · Nov 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−40%−30%−20%−10%0%Nov 2021May 2024Nov 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
GGRW 16.7%XT 16.5%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
GGRW 1.17, betterXT 1.08
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
GGRW −50.3%XT −34.4%, better
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
GGRW 1.08XT 1.35

GGRW and XT in the news

Popular comparisons

  • GGRWDvsKOMPA

    Gabelli Growth Innovators ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.90% · 0.20%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XTAvsKOMPA

    iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.46% · 0.20%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GGRWDvsTRFMA

    Gabelli Growth Innovators ETF · AAM Transformers ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.90% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XTAvsTRFMA

    iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF · AAM Transformers ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.46% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GGRWDvsXITKA

    Gabelli Growth Innovators ETF · State Street SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.90% · 0.45%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XTAvsXITKA

    iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF · State Street SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.46% · 0.45%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.