XT ranks 1st and GGRW 29th of 30 funds in the Disruptive Innovation Category.
GGRW vs XT
XT −0.44pt a year
0.90%0.46%
XT 196.9×the volume
34868.5K
XT +1.9pt
+4.6%+6.5%
GGRW vs XT Performance
+25.3%+36.8%
- GGRW 0.90%
- XT 0.46%, better
- GGRW $8M
- XT $3.81B
- GGRW +2.4%
- XT +21.6%, better
- GGRW
- XT 6.88%
- GGRW 42
- XT 216
- GGRW 348 sh
- XT 68.5K sh, better
- GGRW $34.85
- XT $79.88
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GGRW | XT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F0 | A95Higher |
| Mission | A81 | |
| Risk | A73 | A85Higher |
| Tradability | D33 | A77Higher |
| Holdings | C48 | B67Higher |
| Durability | F20 | A97Higher |
Rank among Disruptive Innovation funds
Same Category. GGRW and XT are both graded against the same 30 Disruptive Innovation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GGRWD
XTA
In short
GGRW A rare bird in innovation land: Gabelli's value instincts aimed at the digital economy, wrapped in a non-transparent ETF that keeps its stock picks off the daily tape. Real choices, where most peers in the theme just track an index.
XT Innovation, spread thin on purpose. XT holds roughly 200 global companies scored by Morningstar analysts for exposure to a handful of exponential tech themes, so no single moonshot carries the fund.
Stated mandate
GGRW The Fund seeks capital appreciation by investing primarily in common stocks relevant to innovation, defined as new technologies, products, or services that change how businesses operate. It targets companies whose earnings-growth prospects are undervalued.
XT XT seeks to track an index of stocks from developed and emerging markets whose companies create or use exponential technologies. The strategy targets technologies with potential economic benefits, including the ability to displace older technologies or create new markets.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GGRW vs XT Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GGRW vs XT Cost
Overpaying GGRW vs XT
$7,810
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GGRW 0.90%
$17,040
XT 0.46%
$9,230
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GGRW | XT | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,593 | $830 | $763 |
| 20 | $6,015 | $3,195 | $2,820 |
| 30 | $17,040 | $9,230 | $7,810 |
- 0.90%GGRW
- 0.46%XT, cheaper
- Middle half of Disruptive Innovation funds
- Median 0.65%
XT 3rd cheapest of 30 funds
GGRW 30th cheapest of 30 funds
GGRW vs XT Dividends
- GGRW
- XT 6.88%
- GGRW
- XT $5.69
- GGRW $0.15
- XT $0.36
- GGRW Dec 29, 2025
- XT Jun 15, 2026
- GGRW Jan 9, 2026
- XT Jun 18, 2026
- GGRW Irregular
- XT Twice a year
Distribution history
GGRW vs XT Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- GGRW
- XT
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GGRW 16.7%XT 16.5%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- GGRW 1.17, betterXT 1.08
- Worst fall
- GGRW −50.3%XT −34.4%, better
- Market sensitivity
- GGRW 1.08XT 1.35
GGRW and XT in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.90% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.46% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.90% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.46% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.90% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.46% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

