Skip to content

GHTA vs RISN

Goose Hollow Tactical Allocation ETF

GHTADCboe

Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF

RISNANYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

RISN −1.05pt a year

GHTA1.77%RISN0.72%

Avg volume · 30D

RISN 2.4×the volume

GHTA6.19KRISN14.8K

3Y return · a year

RISN +3.6pt

GHTA+9.7%RISN+13.3%

GHTA vs RISN Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+1.2%GHTA+4.8%RISN

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. GHTA +1.2%. RISN +4.8%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−5%−2.5%7.5%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
GHTA 1.77%
RISN 0.72%, better
Fund size
GHTA $30M
RISN $70M
1Y total return
GHTA +1.2%
RISN +4.8%, better
Yield (12M)
GHTA 3.86%, better
RISN 1.05%
Holdings
GHTA 26
RISN 53
Avg volume (30D)
GHTA 6.19K sh
RISN 14.8K sh, better
NAV per share
GHTA $29.92
RISN $31.09
52W range

ETF.net Grade

GHTA: Cost 3, Risk 43, Mission 57, Tradability 63, Holdings 45, Durability 50. RISN: Cost 76, Risk 46, Mission 85, Tradability 64, Holdings 80, Durability 68.
Pillar letters and Scores for GHTA, RISN, with each pillar’s weight
PillarGHTARISN
Cost30% weightF3A76Higher
Mission25% weightB57A85Higher
Risk15% weightC43C46Higher
Tradability15% weightB63B64Higher
Holdings10% weightC45A80Higher
Durability5% weightC50B68Higher

Rank among Tactical Allocation funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. GHTA and RISN are both graded against the same 46 Tactical Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Tactical Allocation⁠

Category · 46 funds
See all 46 ›

RISN ranks 4th and GHTA 38th of 46 funds in the Tactical Allocation Category.

  1. Rank 1AENDWCambria Endowment Style ETFScore 81
  2. Rank 2AGMODGMO Dynamic Allocation ETFScore 76
  3. Rank 3APTBDPacer Trendpilot US Bond ETFScore 72
  4. Rank 4ARISNInspire Capital Appreciation ETFScore 71
  5. Rank 5BPBLPGIM Portfolio Ballast ETFScore 69
  6. Rank 37CTOAOTwin Oak Active Opportunities III ETFScore 39
  7. Rank 38DGHTAGoose Hollow Tactical Allocation ETFScore 38
  8. Rank 38DNMBLNovaTide Flexible Allocation ETFScore 38

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

GHTADGoose Hollow Tactical Allocation ETF

RISNAInspire Capital Appreciation ETF

In short

GHTA A boutique macro shop's one-ticker answer to 60/40: GHTA actively shuffles global stock and bond ETFs as the business cycle turns, and measures itself against a plain 60% MSCI World / 40% Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate blend.

RISN A tactical blend of U.S. large-cap stocks and U.S. bonds from a values-screening shop, built to chase long-term growth with less turbulence than the large-cap market, at a fee below the typical tactical peer.

Stated mandate

GHTA The Fund seeks total return. It uses an actively managed tactical, go-anywhere approach across a wide variety of asset classes, including individual equities and ETFs, with exposure determined by market capitalization and/or industry classification.

RISN The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation with lower volatility than the U.S. large-cap stock market.

Why people hold it

  • GHTA Go-anywhere by design. One ticker buys an actively managed mix across asset classes and geographies instead of a fixed stock-bond split.gham.co
  • Honest yardstick: the fund names a 60% MSCI World / 40% Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate blend as its reference, so the manager's calls are judged against a simple mix anyone can replicate.
  • Built on ETFs, not a black box. The portfolio holds equity and fixed income funds, and the adviser runs a macro and business-cycle framework it has applied since the 2021 launch.gham.cogham.co 2
  • RISN Charges 0.72% a year, under the going rate for tactical multi-asset funds that actively shift their mix.
  • One ticket holds U.S. large-cap equities alongside U.S. fixed income, with the stated aim of long-term appreciation at lower volatility than U.S. large caps.
  • One of the stronger implementations in a crowded tactical multi-asset field, with a live record going back to its 2020 launch.
  • Pays out quarterly, so the bond sleeve shows up as scheduled cash rather than a once-a-year surprise.

Worth knowing

  • GHTA Cost is the sticking point: 1.77% net of a waiver through January 31, 2027 (1.84% gross), above the median of its 46-fund tactical group. ENDW charges 0.22%; GMOD 0.50% net of a waiver through June 30, 2027.
  • Small and lightly traded, so bid-ask spreads can be wider than on household-name allocation funds, and size moves with flows.
  • Everything rides on the manager's timing, not an index rulebook, and cash comes back once or twice a year rather than monthly.gham.co
  • RISN Thinly traded and modest in size, so bid-ask spreads can matter more than the fee does. Limit orders are the standard workaround.
  • Tactical means judgment calls: the allocation can look nothing like a fixed stock/bond blend at any given moment.
  • Cheap for tactical, not cheap outright. Peers such as ENDW (0.22%) and ONOF (0.39%) run at a fraction of the fee.

Full GHTA profile⁠

Full RISN profile⁠

GHTA vs RISN Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

GHTA vs RISN Cost

Overpaying GHTA vs RISN

$16,014

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • GHTA 1.77%

    $29,971

  • RISN 0.72%

    $13,957

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • GHTA 1.77%
  • RISN 0.72%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$10K$20K$30K051015202530GHTA $29,971RISN $13,957

Year by year

YearGHTARISNOverpaying
10$3,022$1,284$1,738
20$10,977$4,888$6,089
30$29,971$13,957$16,014

Expense ratio

  • 1.77%GHTA
  • 0.72%RISN, cheaper
  • Middle half of Tactical Allocation funds
  • Median 0.93%

RISN 12th cheapest of 46 funds

GHTA 44th cheapest of 46 funds

GHTA vs RISN Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
GHTA 3.86%, better
RISN 1.05%
Payout (12M)
GHTA $1.15
RISN $0.32
Last payment
GHTA $1.15
RISN $0.08
Ex-dividend
GHTA Dec 16, 2025
RISN Sep 25, 2026
Paid on
GHTA Dec 17, 2025
RISN Oct 1, 2026
Frequency
GHTA Annual
RISN Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2020 to 2026, same scale for both

GHTAAnnual · 8 paymentsAll GHTA payments⁠
One bar per payment. 8 payments from 2020 to 2026 YTD. Dec 27, 2021 $0.10; Dec 20, 2022 $0.04; Dec 27, 2022 $0.06; Dec 19, 2023 $0.63; Dec 27, 2023 $0.01; Dec 17, 2024 $0.66; Dec 27, 2024 $0.03; Dec 16, 2025 $1.15. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.50202020232026YTD
RISNQuarterly · 24 paymentsAll RISN payments⁠
One bar per payment. 24 payments from 2020 to 2026 YTD. Sep 25, 2020 $0.03; Dec 14, 2020 $1.16; Dec 30, 2020 $0.01; Mar 26, 2021 $0.03; Jun 25, 2021 $0.05; Sep 24, 2021 $0.05; Dec 14, 2021 $2.65; Sep 23, 2022 $0.06; Dec 14, 2022 $0.23; Mar 27, 2023 $0.13; Jun 23, 2023 $0.15; Sep 22, 2023 $0.11; Dec 14, 2023 $0.13; Mar 27, 2024 $0.08; Jun 25, 2024 $0.06; Sep 25, 2024 $0.10; Dec 16, 2024 $0.13; Mar 27, 2025 $0.04; Jun 26, 2025 $0.06; Sep 26, 2025 $0.12; Dec 17, 2025 $0.07; Mar 27, 2026 $0.07; Jun 26, 2026 $0.10; Sep 25, 2026 $0.08. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.50202020232026YTD

GHTA vs RISN Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
GHTA 10.0%, betterRISN 11.4%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
GHTA 0.53RISN 0.77, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
GHTA −13.9%since Nov 2021RISN −21.9%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
GHTA 0.86RISN 1.08

Popular comparisons

  • GHTADvsENDWA

    Goose Hollow Tactical Allocation ETF · Cambria Endowment Style ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.77% · 0.22%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RISNAvsENDWA

    Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF · Cambria Endowment Style ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.72% · 0.22%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GHTADvsGMODA

    Goose Hollow Tactical Allocation ETF · GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.77% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RISNAvsGMODA

    Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF · GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.72% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GHTADvsPTBDA

    Goose Hollow Tactical Allocation ETF · Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.77% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RISNAvsPTBDA

    Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF · Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.72% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.