RISN ranks 4th and GHTA 38th of 46 funds in the Tactical Allocation Category.
GHTA vs RISN
RISN −1.05pt a year
1.77%0.72%
RISN 2.4×the volume
6.19K14.8K
RISN +3.6pt
+9.7%+13.3%
GHTA vs RISN Performance
+1.2%+4.8%
- GHTA 1.77%
- RISN 0.72%, better
- GHTA $30M
- RISN $70M
- GHTA +1.2%
- RISN +4.8%, better
- GHTA 3.86%, better
- RISN 1.05%
- GHTA 26
- RISN 53
- GHTA 6.19K sh
- RISN 14.8K sh, better
- GHTA $29.92
- RISN $31.09
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GHTA | RISN |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F3 | A76Higher |
| Mission | B57 | A85Higher |
| Risk | C43 | C46Higher |
| Tradability | B63 | B64Higher |
| Holdings | C45 | A80Higher |
| Durability | C50 | B68Higher |
Rank among Tactical Allocation funds
Same Category. GHTA and RISN are both graded against the same 46 Tactical Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GHTAD
RISNA
In short
GHTA A boutique macro shop's one-ticker answer to 60/40: GHTA actively shuffles global stock and bond ETFs as the business cycle turns, and measures itself against a plain 60% MSCI World / 40% Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate blend.
RISN A tactical blend of U.S. large-cap stocks and U.S. bonds from a values-screening shop, built to chase long-term growth with less turbulence than the large-cap market, at a fee below the typical tactical peer.
Stated mandate
GHTA The Fund seeks total return. It uses an actively managed tactical, go-anywhere approach across a wide variety of asset classes, including individual equities and ETFs, with exposure determined by market capitalization and/or industry classification.
RISN The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation with lower volatility than the U.S. large-cap stock market.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GHTA vs RISN Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GHTA vs RISN Cost
Overpaying GHTA vs RISN
$16,014
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GHTA 1.77%
$29,971
RISN 0.72%
$13,957
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GHTA | RISN | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $3,022 | $1,284 | $1,738 |
| 20 | $10,977 | $4,888 | $6,089 |
| 30 | $29,971 | $13,957 | $16,014 |
- 1.77%GHTA
- 0.72%RISN, cheaper
- Middle half of Tactical Allocation funds
- Median 0.93%
RISN 12th cheapest of 46 funds
GHTA 44th cheapest of 46 funds
GHTA vs RISN Dividends
- GHTA 3.86%, better
- RISN 1.05%
- GHTA $1.15
- RISN $0.32
- GHTA $1.15
- RISN $0.08
- GHTA Dec 16, 2025
- RISN Sep 25, 2026
- GHTA Dec 17, 2025
- RISN Oct 1, 2026
- GHTA Annual
- RISN Quarterly
Distribution history
GHTA vs RISN Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GHTA 10.0%, betterRISN 11.4%
- Return per unit of risk
- GHTA 0.53RISN 0.77, better
- Worst fall
- GHTA −13.9%RISN −21.9%
- Market sensitivity
- GHTA 0.86RISN 1.08
Popular comparisons
- 1.77% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.72% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.77% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.72% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.77% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.72% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.