YLDE ranks 1st and GINX 21st of 50 funds in the Active Option Income Category.
GINX vs YLDE
YLDE −0.54pt a year
1.02%0.48%
YLDE 1.7×the volume
7.96K13.3K
GINX vs YLDE Performance
+23.9%+16.5%
- GINX 1.02%
- YLDE 0.48%, better
- GINX $105M
- YLDE $177M
- GINX +23.9%, better
- YLDE +16.5%
- GINX 2.22%
- YLDE 7.27%, better
- GINX 131
- YLDE 50
- GINX 7.96K sh
- YLDE 13.3K sh, better
- GINX $35.23
- YLDE $56.30
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GINX | YLDE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D29 | A86Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | A71 | A71 |
| Tradability | B66 | A80Higher |
| Holdings | A83Higher | A82 |
| Durability | B66 | A90Higher |
Rank among Active Option Income funds
Same Category. GINX and YLDE are both graded against the same 50 Active Option Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GINXC
YLDEA
In short
GINX Most income funds rent out the stocks they own. GINX keeps its global dividend sleeve intact and runs the income engine beside it: daily credit call spreads on US indices, where the purchased call sets a ceiling on the option leg's loss.
YLDE A 2017 ClearBridge dividend portfolio that had an income engine bolted on in 2025: about 50 large-cap dividend payers, with index calls sold on top for premium. Pays monthly, charges 0.48%, no waiver, below the category median.
Stated mandate
GINX The Fund seeks current income as its primary objective and capital appreciation as its secondary objective. It is actively managed and combines global-equity ETFs with daily index credit call spreads to generate income.
YLDE The Fund seeks income and long-term capital appreciation through an actively managed enhanced equity-income strategy. It primarily invests in dividend-paying equities and writes U.S. exchange-traded calls on U.S. large-cap equity indices to enhance income.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GINX vs YLDE Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GINX vs YLDE Cost
Overpaying GINX vs YLDE
$9,407
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GINX 1.02%
$19,012
YLDE 0.48%
$9,605
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GINX | YLDE | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,797 | $865 | $932 |
| 20 | $6,746 | $3,328 | $3,418 |
| 30 | $19,012 | $9,605 | $9,407 |
- 1.02%GINX
- 0.48%YLDE, cheaper
- Middle half of Active Option Income funds
- Median 0.95%
YLDE 8th cheapest of 50 funds
GINX 36th cheapest of 50 funds
GINX vs YLDE Dividends
- GINX 2.22%
- YLDE 7.27%, better
- GINX $0.80
- YLDE $4.17
- GINX $0.15
- YLDE $0.30
- GINX Sep 28, 2026
- YLDE Nov 2, 2026
- GINX Sep 29, 2026
- YLDE Nov 5, 2026
- GINX Quarterly
- YLDE Monthly
Distribution history
GINX vs YLDE Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GINX 9.6%YLDE 10.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- GINX 1.27YLDE 1.24
- Worst fall
- GINX −12.5%YLDE −20.2%
- Market sensitivity
- GINX 0.53YLDE 0.60
GINX and YLDE in the news
Popular comparisons
- 1.02% · 0.34%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.48% · 0.34%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.02% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.48% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.02% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.48% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
